It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by asmeone2
reply to post by eaganthorn
In my OP I was reffering to hard drug use, but I ran out of time to edit that. Later on other people added the alcohol.
Originally posted by willywagga
Yeah and then what ??. So they fail and then what, shoot them. If you deny someone welfare what will they live on, fresh air ? Maybe they'll just have to steal the money from you,
Originally posted by mopusvindictus
reply to post by Evisscerator
How does a single mom do 40 hrs a week of service?
Originally posted by kdial1
reply to post by asmeone2
Did you post the same question on this forum?
webrats.com...
Just wondering, cause I ran across that thread and it sounds almost identical to yours.
Kdial1
The Job - Urine Test
I HAVE TO PASS A URINE TEST FOR MY JOB... SO I AGREE 100%. Like a lot of folks in this state, I have a job. I work, they pay me. I pay my taxes and the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit. In order to get that paycheck, I am required to pass a random urine test with which I have no problem. What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes to people who don' t have to pass a urine test. Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check because I have to pass one to earn it for them? Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet. I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their A**, doing drugs, while I work. . .. . Can you imagine how much money the state would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance check? Pass this along if you agree or simply delete if you don't. Hope you all will pass it along, though . . .. Something has to change in this country -- and soon!
Originally posted by sir_chancealot
I have an even better question.
Can anyone please show me the Constitutional Amendment (which, for any that are ignorant, merely lays out what is PERMITTED to the federal government, all other rights being limited to the State) which allows food stamps, HUD, Department of Education, etc.?
Thank you.
Originally posted by quaple_pouge
reply to post by mopusvindictus
That is exactly why I think welfare recipients should be not only drug tested, but hold down some sort of job, even if it is just flipping patties 20 hours a week. At least then they would be doing something productive and possibly instill a sense of work ethics and pride in her child(ren).
True story: A few years ago I lived next door to a "welfare momma". She had 4 or 5 kids, all stair steps, with multiple baby daddies coming and going. She sold drugs, blatantly, out of her home. And come Christmas time, every one of those kids got a new bike AND a power wheels car. Those are the people that make me sick. She also got money from FEMA claiming to be a victim of Katrina....when we lived about 75 miles west of New Orleans!
Originally posted by mopusvindictus
reply to post by damurph
Enough is a G-d dmaned nuff already
who the hell on earth are you? What Taxes are you paying I have listed the numbers
None of you pay Anything beyond a few bucks for welfare you just people who are poor and miserable just like the people who are scared into giving away other peoples freedom
______
Who Am I?
I'm an American Taxpayer that's pissed off that so many people seem to think it's alright for people living off of our money to be able to spend that redistributed money on their own vices.
I've heard your spiel on how much taxes you pay compared to the rest of us.
I've heard the numbers you've spouted about just how little of that goes to welfare.
That's not the point. None of us are opposing Welfare.
What some of us are opposing is the use of that welfare money on Drugs and/or Alcohol,
Whether the problem is the lesser of two evils is not the point. We're not argueing it's a tough question with tough answers.
I never claimed to be a saint. I enjoy drinking beer. I used to smoke cigarettes. I used to smoke J's. I used to do drugs.
The difference I wish to point out, is that I paid for them with money I had earned. Not money I had gotten from somebody elses tax dollars.
Originally posted by quaple_pouge
reply to post by mopusvindictus
That is exactly why I think welfare recipients should be not only drug tested, but hold down some sort of job, even if it is just flipping patties 20 hours a week. At least then they would be doing something productive and possibly instill a sense of work ethics and pride in her child(ren).
True story: A few years ago I lived next door to a "welfare momma". She had 4 or 5 kids, all stair steps, with multiple baby daddies coming and going. She sold drugs, blatantly, out of her home. And come Christmas time, every one of those kids got a new bike AND a power wheels car. Those are the people that make me sick. She also got money from FEMA claiming to be a victim of Katrina....when we lived about 75 miles west of New Orleans!
Originally posted by quaple_pouge
reply to post by DingleberrySmurf
They sure did tell me that since I had a job I did not qualify for benefits.
Also, it may vary by state.
Edit to censor myself
[edit on 21/8/08 by quaple_pouge]