It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow
And agian while I have your attention, i gotsta ask..where are the damn Indian photos from the rocket?? I would think they'd have a camera on 24/7?? I am hanging to see anything from these guys, space, moon, stars...or you know... ETs!
Cheers,
wZn
Originally posted by Kandinsky
The Chandrayaan 1 is due to begin synchronous orbit with the moon at 100km on Saturday. Part of the program will be to map the moon with hi-res 3D photography. If any structures are there, they will be revealed with great clarity by Chandrayaan 1.
Originally posted by ArMaP
Here is the super resolution version, and as you can see it does not bring anything really interesting over the other images, it only made the seams between the photos more visible.
Originally posted by badgerprints
The new Lunar orbiter that India is putting up to map the moon and do high res photos might shed new light on these things soon. If they do find something interesting maybe we'll get a peek at uncensored results.
Originally posted by mikesingh
Originally posted by ArMaP
Here is the super resolution version, and as you can see it does not bring anything really interesting over the other images, it only made the seams between the photos more visible.
Thanks ArMap! That was a good hi res image. I've sharpened the image and highlighted the 'structures' in the crater in yellow that seem a little intriguing. Here...
Strange geology on the Moon, what?
Cheers!
Originally posted by badgerprints
The new Lunar orbiter that India is putting up to map the moon and do high res photos might shed new light on these things soon. If they do find something interesting maybe we'll get a peek at uncensored results.
That is because this is not from a camera from "these days", is from a camera from 14 years ago.
Originally posted by bpg131313
No disrespect to you, but that image isn't even close to the resolution I'd be happy with. It's a slap in the face to camera technology these days to call these images "hi res".