Uncensored NASA Moon Images!!

One more for the road! But this isn't from the LO. This is near Schrodinger crater toward the NW taken by Apollo:


Image Source: NASA

Cheers!

lpod.org...

Note all but the outer large rings have a dark dot in the center......why the difference? The ones in the lower right look almost cartoonish, like they were drawn in......I am a believer but just pointing out a difference in all the circles

check out skippers take on these pics for a good point of view. The debunkers need little help these days, be wary of what you are looking at. I will say a large amount of evidence more credible than this has already seen the light of day so what is the big deal for these pics in the first place?

K

It's breathtaking to read what many people believe - without proof, of course. I feel, many of the shown anomalies are either weird natural formations, imaging artefacts, or, deliberately fabricated hoaxes.

The normal thing is, planetery images are properly referenced (at least by ccordinate set, mission/date (if available). So one can look it up in an official image library.

However, this is not the case. Hence a possible proof for/against censorship becomes impossible. And people can continue to do what they ever wanted to do: Belief instead of knowledge.

Hey, great work Mike, Skipper has just released a bit more info based on your work at marsanomalyresearch, thanks to him i've found you guys .
I do believe the tower looks mostly real, however I also agree with Skipper that some of the images appear to be tampered with prob prior to scanning.
Its obvious life is out there, and the top people at goverment know about this because, explains why there has been a recent sudden shift in political policy especialy with obama, after a briefing that he stated he didnt believe initally he did a total U-Turn on his 'no more money for nasa' policy and more for education. Its now 'space space space'.

This apollo image is amaizing, it looks like a ship of some kind on an L-Shape runway? One can see the shadow drop away underneath the 'ship' Which proves the appendadges are suspended above the crator. Perhaps its even a gun barrel part of a cannon/lazer?, with a tower building similar to previous images perhaps a control tower?:

Where is the NASA location of this image?

reply to post by mikesingh


What the heck is that, looks like a giant lizard shark creature.

Hey Mike is there a pictorial book you reccomend to look at all these simply obvious and amazing images? I have Hoaglands Dark Mission which is great, but this thread has many more examples i'd like to look at in book format.

Also what is the update on the NASA footage found at the McDonalds?

thanks matey!

Z

Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow
reply to post by mikesingh

 

What the heck is that, looks like a giant lizard shark creature.

It's a crater.

If you are talking of what I think you are talking, I think it's just a hill inside the crater, projecting a shadow and itself partially covered by the shadow of the crater's rim.

reply to post by ArMaP


Just out of interest, so what do you believe in?

Any conspiracies? If so which one/s?

Do you believe what your government tells you? If not, why not?

Thanks

Z

Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow
Hey Mike is there a pictorial book you reccomend to look at all these simply obvious and amazing images? I have Hoaglands Dark Mission which is great, but this thread has many more examples i'd like to look at in book format.

Well Z, these images you won't find anywhere else as these have been found only by us ATSers!

Also what is the update on the NASA footage found at the McDonalds?

The guys are on the job, but I suggest you contact zorgon for the latest info.

Cheers!

reply to post by mikesingh


Aww man, I swear you and Internos and zorgon should make a nice coffee table book, it would sell out within seconds.

You could call it "Suppose they hid a spaceship and nobody ever saw it".



I seriously think you guys should open a school to educate people. OK enough brown nosing, I'm on the topic of finding the hole in the north pole!



Z

Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow
OK I'm on the topic of finding the hole in the north pole!

Z

Which North Pole? Earth Moon or Mars? You'll find them on the Moon though. Just invoke NASA's World Wind, goto Clementine > 40X and lo and behold! You'll see 'black holes' at the Moon's poles!! Of course that's due to loss of data, but is it PURPOSEFUL loss of data? Have they hidden/covered up what the NRO doesn't want us to see?

Well, your guess is as good as mine! But let's hope India's Chandrayaan Moon mission thats just blasted off gets some good HD pics! Wonder if India and U.S Mil int /CIA / NASA are in cahoots?? Damn!!

Cheers!

[edit on 23-10-2008 by mikesingh]

reply to post by mikesingh


Looking at tha position of the shadows in the craters and canyon, then on the so called barrel shaped object and building, I see no difference. Surely then they are all depressions into the ground. If the barrel and building were comming out of the ground wouldnt the shadows be on the opposite sides?

Originally posted by mikesingh
Of course that's due to loss of data, but is it PURPOSEFUL loss of data? Have they hidden/covered up what the NRO doesn't want us to see?

It's not data loss, it's lack of data, not the same thing.

There is data for the poles, like in this photo from the north pole.


And there are also photos from the south pole, it was with those photos that they saw that there is an area on the Moon's poles that never get sunlight and where they think there is ice.

Originally posted by ArMaP

Originally posted by mikesingh
Of course that's due to loss of data, but is it PURPOSEFUL loss of data? Have they hidden/covered up what the NRO doesn't want us to see?

It's not data loss, it's lack of data, not the same thing.

Jeez! You sure? Take a peek below at these pics:

There are many areas on the clementine data set showing blacked out areas such as the one above. The official story is "data loss" However as we shall see later, subsequent versions of the data set no longer show this "missing data" especially the last and best quality set. So did they add data or fill it in with something so people would not ask questions? www.thelivingmoon.com...

So it's not 'lack' of data but data 'loss'. In the year of our Lord 2008, we can't have any 'lack' of data can we? What with so much Moon mapping that has already been carried out!

Cheers!

The blank areas appear to be a mapping bug within WW. The shaded relief view does not have the blank spots.

Of course, if you really want to see what "they" are hiding, the Clementine images of the polar region (and the other "missing" spots) are available at pdsmaps.wr.usgs.gov...

[edit on 24-10-2008 by Phage]

reply to post by ArMaP



hi armap, i think there is more in there than a hill. to the right there is something that looks like tubes, 90 degree angles and such.


anyway, how do you get a hill that size inside a crater? and that close to the wall?

i have to say i am a fan of your picture savy.

Originally posted by fooks
reply to post by ArMaP

 

hi armap, i think there is more in there than a hill. to the right there is something that looks like tubes, 90 degree angles and such.
anyway, how do you get a hill that size inside a crater? and that close to the wall?

Here it is colorized to highlight the strange shapes.



Looks like a 'tower' at the bottom of the near edge of the crater! But hey, that's just me!

cheers!

Originally posted by mikesingh
Jeez! You sure? Take a peek below at these pics:

Of course I am not sure, how can I be sure of something in which I did not participate?

The photo you posted before, like the first one on the post to which I am answering, are areas for which they did not use the available data, and that image with the perfect black circle is obviously not the result of data loss.

The second image you showed looks like data loss, but was not the photo you were talking about, you were talking about the poles, right?

There's one thing that I think is not correct on the text from "The Living Moon" that you posted, saying that the data set shows "blacked out areas" is implying that there was data for that areas that was blacked out on purpose, and if the official story is data loss for those small areas (mostly on the far side) I do not see any problem with that.

So it's not 'lack' of data but data 'loss'. In the year of our Lord 2008, we can't have any 'lack' of data can we? What with so much Moon mapping that has already been carried out!

Maybe that data isn't lacking, have you seen the data from all the wavelengths?

PS: I have no lords.

reply to post by watchZEITGEISTnow

I have an old image I have had since 1979, it has a machine in a cubicle that looks almost identical to that. 72-H-839... In this photo the machine is stirring up dust and appears to be grinding away in the cubicle. You have to use magnification to see the machine. But it is pretty obvious what it is doing. I am new with a computer, being from the dark ages, I have just arrived in the modern age, so as soon as I learn how to post pictures, will show you some of what I see from all the very old images I have. That picture is just amazing, recognized the machine right away. It is really very detailed. Excellent!!!.....moonwize..10/28/08