It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by zerbot565
i fail to see the logic in that strawman agrument,
or you fail to use formula correctly.
Originally posted by Geemor
if god created everything so he thence created evil as well, and therefore evil is part of him.
Originally posted by Clearskies
Pharaoh would NOT let the Hebrews go and eventually God let him have his own way, without conscience! He didn't MAKE him do it, He just took away his feeling of guilt in his heart!
oh no? you should read the bibble. in first or second book of moses, it specifically says that god did harden the heart of pharao so that he didn't listen moses. it clearly stands there in black and white!
Originally posted by sir_chancealot
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
... Logically speaking God could NOT be pure good unless there was evil to judge or contrast his goodness to. ...
Actually, that is ILLOGIC speaking.
The bible tells you that there will come a time when there will be NO evil, no rebellion, sickness, death, etc. There will come a time when God says he will answer his people's prayers before they have even finished asking.
Not true for an omniscient God. Take the garden of Eden for example, Adam and Eve were naked, they were not ashamed of such until they ate the fruit.
Originally posted by Geemor
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
No my friend God isn't evil, God is pure Good. You actually mean to say that God is "Omniscient", meaning he has the knowledge of Good and evil.
...
The fruit from that tree once eaten wasn't evil fruit, it was the tree of the "KNOWLEDGE of good and evil".
hmm, but without experience there cannot be knowledge? so you have to experience evil before having knowledge about it or how do you consider you'll gain knowledge a priori in this, or any matter?
actually, you have to be evil in order to experience it, in order to have comphrehensive knowledge about it.
Originally posted by justamomma
Originally posted by NOTurTypicalWhat would you think of a judge who arbitrarily decided who he would send to jail who were convicted of murder?
What would you call such a judge? Corrupt, unjust?
Exact same with God, he gave us his commandments, when we choose to ignore them or do things our own way anyways then he has to render punishment or else he wouldn't be just, he would be a corrupt judge.
Why did he not just make robots then? If doing things my own way and learning from them is so wrong, then why not just take away my free will since having free will technically means I should be FREE to exercise my will w/out fear of punishment.
I can't address why you fail to understand, bu I can try and present his fallacy a different way.
Originally posted by zerbot565
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
No, that is a "straw man argument", it's logical promiscuity. What the OP did was create a false version of God and shot down that false version he created.
It's a logical fallacy:
i fail to see the logic in that strawman agrument,
or you fail to use formula correctly.
if god is everything he surly must be evil to
heck for god to be omnipotent he to must know how to get lost,
how to kill without feeling regret and even be able deny him/her-self,
denile in what god can do or be is actual blasphemy
Absolutely false, stop and imagine a world where every man woman and child followed all commandments to a T.
Originally posted by justamomma
reply to post by Geemor
Clearly that is the point of religion; to not think about things for yourself. To adopt the "moral" standard of someone else and to impose it on others. Perfect set up for disaster if you ask me, which goes to show.... god is evil
Originally posted by caballero
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Why do you say that? the OP is saying that god is good and evil, and so far I havent seen him change his stance on that?
You and that other guy are misunderstanding the OP and the logical fallacy you both have failed explaining.
It was god who created Lucifer God made him a beautiful angel with musical abilities that even god envied, god also made lucifer envious and spiteful. Whichever route you go god created evil.
Originally posted by caballero
God even said it "himself" he said he was light and dark alpha and omega, good and bad, chaos and peace.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by v01i0
I didn't mean to imply Exodus 4:21 said that, I should have quoted the person I was answering. He said something to the effect "The first or second book of Moses it talks about God hardening Pharaoh's heart".
I was posting the exact verse where it discusses such. My bad for not quoting his statement first.
But you guys have the misunderstanding, "evil" doesn't exist, it's the absence of "good". Or the opposite of good. Good exists, God is pure good. When a creature of free will acts not in accordance with the goodness of God that is where "evil" is birthed.
Originally posted by v01i0
reply to post by caballero
I am glad that this thread found resonance in you too. Let me borrow your words to answer NOTurtypical:
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by caballero
God even said it "himself" he said he was light and dark alpha and omega, good and bad, chaos and peace.
I hope you can understand this.
Sincerely,
-v
You're on the right path! "Cold" as a thing doesn't exist. We call the absence of HEAT "cold". Same with "evil", it doesn't exist, it is what God and we call the absence of good.
Originally posted by v01i0
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Cold? My answer is yes and no. It is reality for the observer, but in the end, it is merely a viewpoint regarding temperature.
By the way, you are claming that evil does not exist and it is only lack of good. I am getting confused here. Of course I understand what you are saying, but I find it confusing that seeing all the evil in the world, and it is so much spoken about. And how can something not exist by lacking of it's opposite. I am really getting confused here
Sincerely,
-v
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Not true for an omniscient God. Take the garden of Eden for example, Adam and Eve were naked, they were not ashamed of such until they ate the fruit.
What made them ashamed to be naked in public was the "knowledge" of right and wrong from the standpoint of decency.