posted on Nov, 10 2008 @ 07:57 PM
Thanks, Theability, for posting these. That first photo is pretty much conclusive PROOF the beams were cut, and they weren't cut "during clean up".
Don't waste your time replying to Swampfox and Co Vet. Swampfox stirs # up on a lot of 9/11 sites, and CO Vet is just talking what he don't know.
He's probably Air Force or NG.
I AM a demolition specialist, US Army trained, 12-B Combat Engineer. I've used C-4, PETN, RDX, TNT, det cord. They'll all cut steel. And, yes, I've
used Thermite, too, and it can cut steel in a clean line, just like in the photo. It can "make holes", too, but that aint all.
To me, the first photo, the cut beam right above the fireman's head, is PROOF the beams were cut. "During clean-up"? BS! WHY WOULD SOMEONE USE A
CUTTING TORCH TO MAKE A CUT AT SUCH A STEEP ANGLE? Ithey would chance being crushed by whatever was above. Also, if "during clean-up", why cut them
10 feet off the ground, and not flush with the debris pile? The angle cut is exactly what is used to direct falling debris in a controlled demolition.
These photos constitute some of the most convincing EVIDENCE of controlled demolition. Thanks again for posting them, Ability!