It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by cavscout
People, if you dont know what you are talking about dont make a fool of yourself. Bunch of Hollywood snipers.
First, there would be no "splitting the head like a coconut" because well trained snipers aim center of mass.
Second, it would be impossible to graze someone intentionally from any distance. Even locked into a vise no weapon is that accurate.
Originally posted by TheRepublic
logically any real sniper would have blown her brains out all over the camera lens. snipers dont miss. hence the term "sniper". and if they do they dont miss the second shot. one shot one kill.
frankly if you believe everything you see on television
thats pretty sad.
Originally posted by cautiouslypessimistic
I take it you are a sniper? You speak as though you know more than the rest of us....
Center mass is almost always ONLY used at great distance(this is a possibilty, however, that doesnt change the fact that if he were aiming center amss, he is a VERY bad shot.)
Also, again, if you knew anything of sniping, you would know that it is by no means out of the question for an elite sniper to shoot the flame off of a candle, without breaking the wax.
And i suspect that there was no bullet or shooter at all.. But that is just a suspicion.
Originally posted by cavscout
Iwas a squad designated marksman, 19DELTA, Cavalry Scout, armored reconnaissance specialist. I trained with the US Army Marksmanship Team and almost made the Presidents 100.
I think I am a little more qualified than someone who heard all about sniping from their uncle who was a super-seal-sniper-K-9-tunnel rate-recon-demolitions expert/COOK.
WRONG. Center of mass is the rule.
Do you understand that if you lock a weapon down so that it does not move and fire at a target you will not be able to make that shot with any consistency.
And you do realize that even if the riffle was that good even the blood flowing through your hand would put you off that wick half the time even if you were the best.
[edit on 14-8-2008 by cavscout]
Originally posted by cautiouslypessimistic
Originally posted by cavscout
Iwas a squad designated marksman, 19DELTA, Cavalry Scout, armored reconnaissance specialist. I trained with the US Army Marksmanship Team and almost made the Presidents 100.
I think I am a little more qualified than someone who heard all about sniping from their uncle who was a super-seal-sniper-K-9-tunnel rate-recon-demolitions expert/COOK.
WRONG. Center of mass is the rule.
Do you understand that if you lock a weapon down so that it does not move and fire at a target you will not be able to make that shot with any consistency.
And you do realize that even if the riffle was that good even the blood flowing through your hand would put you off that wick half the time even if you were the best.
[edit on 14-8-2008 by cavscout]
Dont have enough time to search through my videos and find the candle one, but I think this proves you are full of it:
www.youtube.com...
Go ahead, go to youtube, type in sniper shot. Then tell me again what your classification was and how you almost did this and that.
There is no such thing as a "center mass rule" nor is there a heashot rule. each situation is different, and snipers take different shots depending on trajectory, distance, etc. Either way, a trained sniper would not have missed multiple times, unless he intended to. Once, sure. Not 6 times, though.
Who said anything about locking down a weapon. My argument is that a true sniper does not need to lock down their weapon. A true sniper only needs to steady it.
Instead of overreacting, she moved away from the pain like anyone does when they are shot unexpectedly.
Originally posted by TheRepublic
as for what normal people do when under real gunfire i suggest going to min 1:08 in this video.
Originally posted by cavscout
reply to post by cautiouslypessimistic
Dude, stop. You are going to embarrass yourself here.
It is PHYSICALY IMPOSSIBLE to hit the wick of a candle every time. PERIOD.
The riffle IS NOT THAT ACCURATE, regardless of how great the marksman is!
NO riffle ever invented in the entire world for all time could ever do what you say!
You cant argue this, son. What you are saying is impossible.
Originally posted by cautiouslypessimistic
Also, you'd have to think someone as highly trained and as good a marksman as you claim to be would know that the word is "rifle", not "riffle".
Sometimes, a firearm's accuracy will be measured in MOA. This simply means that under ideal conditions, the gun is capable of repeatedly producing a group of shots whose center points (center-to-center) fit into a circle, the diameter of which can be subtended by that amount of arc. (E.g.: a "1 MOA rifle" should be capable, under ideal conditions, of shooting a 1-inch group at 100 yards, a "2 MOA rifle" .