It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Randy Echo
in the case of a bully coming to the aid of a weaker person to defeat another bully it is called fighting fire with fire,
Russia simply doesnt have the ability to beat us, sorry , I am sure that we are way way ahead on the tech of war to get them to leave and not come back
what good is it to have allies if they wont come to your aid, absolute isolation for your buddy why his down on the ground getting his brains kicked out and you hand him a water and a towel , give me a break
you save that guy, stop that fight with whatever it takes
Originally posted by oldcop911
I think some of y'all need to read a little history. Like The sudetenland just prior to the start of WWII. Hitler just kept moving forward because nobody had the stones to say ENOUGH. I am not a war lover, but Putin is making scary noises and making scary moves. Where will he stop, if no one says ENOUGH?
Originally posted by kidflash2008
reply to post by BlackOps719
BTW, the US would NEVER invade a sovereign nation without approval of her main allies.
nstead, I expect military historian & writer Gwynne Dyer got it right in a March 21 analysis of titled "Abkhazia: Russian Bluff". Slowly but surely, Western allegiances, and NATO membership, is popping up all over in what were once Russia satellite regions. The Soviet empire may be gone, but the Russian mind has long been accustomed to the idea of a buffer zone. And now that both the West and the new version of capitalism growing in Russia are eyeing resources (land, energy, strategic boundaries, and resource in general) the formerly 'soft' regions are firming up. I expect Russia doesn't want to lose much - if any - of Abkhazia, which among other things sports 125 miles of coastline on the Black Sea.
As Seumas Milne writes in the Guardian this morning, "This is a tale of US expansion not Russian aggression." The more we push on these former Russian states to flip over into the US/West/NATO camp, the more resistance may be expected from Russia.
As a marketing guy (which is what I do in real-life) this is an extremely well-crafted campaign. The US/West is painting its motives as 'humanitarian/freedom-loving" while at the same time, sucking Georgian troops into Iraq and now sending US forces into the region, humanitarian aid, of course. There's enough history in the region that a semi-rational argument could be made for either position.
we are looking like complete wimps right now because we have the men...
Originally posted by GrndLkNatv
Quote: "Third, Russia has already stated, flat out, that they would take this nuclear if America gets involved. "
The Russian have not stated so.. They threatened the Ukraine, not the United States.. Who is the only country in the world's history to ever use a Nuclear Weapon? The United States, the Russians have only been so stupid that they used it on theirselves, Chernoble. The United States has more nuclear firepower than all other countries combined....
This will never go beyond a ground war as I am quite sure Putin doesn't want to be turned to dust. The cruelest joke Satan ever played on man was making them think they would live forever... Putin is going to die if he keeps screwing around, he'll end up catching a 308 between the eyes.
The last thing Russia expects is for us to fight back, that's why they are moving forward. Bush and Company were so stupid to take all of our troops out of Europe and put them in the Desert.. That's what happens when you put idiots in charge of the military.
[edit on 14-8-2008 by GrndLkNatv]
[edit on 14-8-2008 by GrndLkNatv]
Originally posted by Randy Echo
obviously you believe we havent implemented any kind of protection from nukes, we have, its in place and it works 100 percent of the time, its been tested, and it has about 4 different levels of itself,
1. anti missle umbrella coast to coast, in place
2. particle beam weapons and space based kinetic weapons
3. high altitude ionization that will destroy missles in flight
So I am not worried about russian missles, at all actually so if they want to go that route let em,
They will be the ones living under the ground not us