PARTISAN? DIVISIVE? POLARIZED!
Are you Catholic or Protestant? American or Communist? Atheist or Christian? Christian or Muslim? Patriotic or Traitor?
Well, to tell the truth, I absolutely hate being placed in a certain-type of "label." The "group-think" presented above is an example of a social
ideology which is dangerous to diversity and the personal rights and liberties of any Human Being.
Why should it be that we have to "belong" to opposite and polarized "factions" to participate in society? This "polarization" demeans us all by
making the individual an "object," which can be discredited and when combined with propaganda from the media, labeled as a "heretic" and devalued.
These "fallacies of logic" illustrate what is wrong in our government, our society, and our religions; false perspectives based on propaganda and
fallacies about a person or group of persons by another person or group to either diffuse "real problems" and divert attention by creating an
emotionally-vested "scandalous media attention or attack." These agendas are based on oppression and fear of losing control and power.
The worst thing to happen to "Freedom of Speech" was the repeal of the "Fairness Doctrine," which served as a "fail-safe" to prevent unfair leverage
in media by groups with more financial influence than any opponent. This mistake will take years to correct; if it ever can be.
Partisan Politics is not only a danger to democracy, it is a danger to national security and the fundamental spirit of what the Founding Fathers
intended for our country. It is getting to the point of being "Un-American." From a rational and compassionate perspective, a two-party system,
which has the ability to "seize-up" normal operations by emotive displays of "partisanism" will effectively hold any proceeding "hostage." And it all
grinds to a halt when critical decisions and rational thought goes unanswered and unthought.
Those "two" parties will polarize the citizens and leave those of rational and open-mindedness behind to wonder if any representation is effective or
actually exists, in the first-place. A vacuum of disent soon develops and the cure would be to add a "counter-balance" to keep the two polarized ends
from tipping "to-and-fro" for all perpetuity; we need a larger additional party or abolish the influence government is bridled with by removing or
effectively inhibiting their actions. There was no need for any party in the early beginning for America; it was unncessary; but we soon found the
"Whigs" and "Muckrakers" controlling all aspects of government.
Emotions must not be allowed to prevail while rational-thinking people can produce compassionate policy effectively and efficiently. This is
necessary due to the "imbalance." Equilibrium must be the "end to the means."
If we continue in this "polarized" ideology and perspective, all hope of "nationalism and partriotism" as a COMBINED and EQUAL peoples will be not
realized or would we be able to actualize it; it will be too late.
I.D.I.C. - Infinite Diversity Infinite Combination...
We all are made stronger by the differences than our similarities; it's how we grow as a species, to become "more" than what we are or have been.
With all of this said, I will end with a short word of wisdom and warning:
"When the first link of the chain is forged, the first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all
irrevocably. As wisdom and warning, the first time any man’s freedom is trodden-on, we’re all damaged.
You’d think we’ve come so far, torture of heretics, burning of witches, in all ancient history. Then, if we even blink an eye, suddenly it
threatens to start all-over again; spreading fear in the name of righteousness.
- Jean Luc Picard
edit on 21-10-2010 by trekwebmaster because: Correction of Typo Errors
edit on 21-10-2010 by trekwebmaster because:
Corrections of Typo Errors
edit on 21-10-2010 by trekwebmaster because: (no reason given)
edit on 21-10-2010 by
trekwebmaster because: (no reason given)