It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BASSPLYR
You have a well thought out post. I like what you wrote. However I think Tupak was shot because somebody in the public, probably a adoring fan, actually thought that there was a west coast east coast thing going on. thought tupak and biggie were actually fighting and decided to help out his hero biggie by being a street soldier and shooting tupak.
Not like at the time the demographics for tupak and biggie weren't a lot of really ignorant people. not all but enough for one of them to actually go out and shoot at his favorite rappers entertainment enemies.
Cointelpro would have been better served shooting lennon, which had far more sway than any rapper out there.
Even though I like rappers like Naz, I also feel that the govt agrees with me that by and large the hip hop industry discredits it self especially during those times and that it didn't have enough traction with the real movers and shakers within the US population and society to even really effect the govt. the bottom line. tupak was too small a fry to assasinate. he really had no true sway over the masses. he was just some rapper on MTV. although a brilliant poet. also don't forget tupaks debut dancing with a rubber blow up sex doll in the digital underground video humpty dance.
Originally posted by avingard
Tupac wasn't a political threat. To be blunt, Obama is going to have a hell of a time getting elected now, do you really think that back then a black rapper who associated himself with gangs was going to get even a whisper of a chance? Having the youth and having passion on your side is one thing, but the truth is that the youth doesn't vote, no matter how passionate they are, and the deciding factor in any election on any level is the middle-aged middle-class.
As for the Black Panther angle, that could have some merit. The problem I see is that the only 'practical' path for groups like that is to have protests, and no one pays attention to protests. If they did we would be out of Iraq right now. At the extreme, the futility of any efforts Tupac might have may have caused more riots (like you said, it was right after the LA riots) and that wouldn't do anything but hurt the rioters cause. No one respects people who burn down towns in protest. So if the FBI wanted Tupac out of the question, they would have let him be; he would have eventually ran out of steam, or been discredited for being associated with another riot (or similar situation).
I think the FBI (actually the Vegas PD probably) didn't investigate because they didn't care.
Originally posted by buds84
I think he was shot down by Illuminati because he had the potential to make a rebel army and maybe overthrow or screw with the government some how.
He talked about things like "# Illuminati" publicly and always talked about having under cover cops trying to kill him.
He actually was being shot at by two under cover cops and managed to kill them both and went to court, and got away with it because the cops were off duty and obviously trying to kill him. When that happened it made him even more of a hero.
In a way I think there have been a few versions of Jesus over time and I think he was one of them.
Originally posted by avingard
Tupac wasn't a political threat. To be blunt, Obama is going to have a hell of a time getting elected now, do you really think that back then a black rapper who associated himself with gangs was going to get even a whisper of a chance? Having the youth and having passion on your side is one thing, but the truth is that the youth doesn't vote, no matter how passionate they are, and the deciding factor in any election on any level is the middle-aged middle-class.
As for the Black Panther angle, that could have some merit. The problem I see is that the only 'practical' path for groups like that is to have protests, and no one pays attention to protests. If they did we would be out of Iraq right now. At the extreme, the futility of any efforts Tupac might have may have caused more riots (like you said, it was right after the LA riots) and that wouldn't do anything but hurt the rioters cause. No one respects people who burn down towns in protest. So if the FBI wanted Tupac out of the question, they would have let him be; he would have eventually ran out of steam, or been discredited for being associated with another riot (or similar situation).
They should care whenever someone gets murdered, it is their job. Not caring is bad enough, perhaps worse than a conspiracy.
I think the FBI (actually the Vegas PD probably) didn't investigate because they didn't care.
2) Behavior: You will not behave in an abusive, hateful and/or racist manner, and will not harass, threaten, nor attack anyone.
1b.) Profanity: You will not use profanity in our forums, and will neither post with language or content that is obscene, sexually oriented, or sexually suggestive nor link to sites that contain such content.