It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Too many stupid people are voting without reading anything. I say Obama, though isn't very clear on his stance.
Originally posted by evanmontegarde
If you're a libertarian then you should look at the Bush administration's financial record.
The CATO Institute, the top Libertarian think tank, has described Bush's presidency as "more liberal" than the Clinton one, spending wise.
President Bush has expanded the size of the Federal government more than any President since FDR.
By increasing government spending (primarily in Iraq) and cutting taxes (mostly for the richest 10% of America) Bush has wracked up the largest national deficit ever.
Who supports the Bush tax cuts? McCain. Who supports staying in Iraq indefinitely? McCain. Who supports spending $12 billion a month in Iraq? McCain.
Bob Barr is the ideal candidate if you are a libertarian, but he has no chance of winning. The question you have to ask yourself is this - are you willing to let the policies of the Bush administration continue?
Originally posted by kaffemoka
There are going to be a lot of posts slamming both candidates on this thread, but I hope you focus on the positives of each candidate. Like I said, neither is perfect and they are both flawed, the greater question is who can offer our country the best path forward...
Originally posted by citizen smith
If you can't decide on a candidate or have lost heart in the entire process altogether, why not offer your vote to 'lobby interest groups' in return for financial compensation?
Originally posted by Skyfloating
* Small Government
* Self-responsibility
* No foreign intervention
* Yes to Universal Healthcare
* No to war (Instead: Diplomacy)
* Yes to Education
* Yes to Capitalism
* Yes to NASA
* No to easy immigration
* No to funds for Africa (instead: Education)
* No to religion in politics
* No to "redistrubution of wealth" (no to extra taxing of the wealthy)
[edit on 29-7-2008 by Skyfloating]
Originally posted by Becker44
I'll give you $100 to vote for McCain!
To cast a vote is one of the greatest things the populace can do. I also feel it is very personal. I highly doubt one can be influenced by anothers opinion of candidates and thus cast a vote in that direction.
You never know, this could be a "Sky" ploy to expose the leanings of many ATS users. It is a conspiracy forum after all.
I wear it on my sleeve. I'm a gun totting card carrying Republican. Not too proud of W but after McCain we'll get a good one to run.
Becker
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Personal values:
Based upon this: Who is the better candidate for me?
# First Senate bill: increase Pell Grant from $4,050 to $5,100. (Aug 2007)
# Sponsored legislations that recruit and reward good teachers. (Sep 2004)
# Voted YES on $52M for "21st century community learning centers". (Oct 2005)
# Voted YES on $5B for grants to local educational agencies. (Oct 2005)
# Voted YES on shifting $11B from corporate tax loopholes to education. (Mar 2005)
# Unrestricted block grants--let states decide spending. (Feb 2000)
# Voted NO on $52M for "21st century community learning centers". (Oct 2005)
# Voted NO on $5B for grants to local educational agencies. (Oct 2005)
# Voted NO on shifting $11B from corporate tax loopholes to education. (Mar 2005)
# Voted NO on funding smaller classes instead of private tutors. (May 2001)
# Voted NO on funding student testing instead of private tutors. (May 2001)
# Voted NO on spending $448B of tax cut on education & debt reduction. (Apr 2001)
# Voted YES on declaring memorial prayers and religious symbols OK at schools. (May 1999)
# Voted YES on allowing more flexibility in federal school rules. (Mar 1999)
# Voted YES on education savings accounts. (Jun 1998)
# Voted YES on school vouchers in DC. (Sep 1997)
# Voted YES on $75M for abstinence education. (Jul 1996)
# Voted YES on requiring schools to allow voluntary prayer. (Jul 1994)
# Voted NO on national education standards. (Feb 1994)
# Focus educational resources to help those with greatest need. (Jul 2001)
# Require state standards, regular assessments, and sanctions. (Jul 2001)
# Support Ed-Flex: more flexibility if more accountable. (Jul 2001)
# Rated 45% by the NEA, indicating a mixed record on public education. (Dec 2003)
Originally posted by Rockpuck
I personally hold out for a Monarchy.
Originally posted by kosmicjack
Based on your parameters, neither of the two main candidates suits you. This is the essence of the problem with this election. Your views are widely held by many Americans, but are not reflected in our candidate choices. The world is changing but our political system is caught in some sort of time warp of antiquated procedures and platforms.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
I personally hold out for a Monarchy.
Originally posted by Cadbury
Skyfloating: May I ask why you feel the need to even bother voting at all?
Originally posted by Skyfloating
reply to post by Andrew E. Wiggin
Thanks for your informed overview. Very helpful (for other readers as well Im sure). Starred.