It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by d11_m_na_c05
reply to post by Icarus Rising
Ok then you think its fine for us to protest weddings and funerals on public property cause we don't like the message of owning a woman .
Originally posted by rapinbatsisaltherage
Christians currently are not true Christians; they are a variation of their own religion, defying their own religious motives. That alone should give you a clue they are not to be reasoned with or taken seriously.
Originally posted by rapinbatsisaltherage
Again: Any argument that needs something that has nothing to do with it to stand on its own feet isn’t much of an argument, and any person who needs such an argument has little merit.
Originally posted by rapinbatsisaltherage
I don’t think I’ve ever so amusingly seen a pot calling a kettle black.
Originally posted by resistor
Originally posted by d11_m_na_c05
reply to post by Icarus Rising
Ok then you think its fine for us to protest weddings and funerals on public property cause we don't like the message of owning a woman .
Obviously you're unfamiliar with the reality of modern marriage, which is quite the opposite of this.
Divorce and Your Credit Score A reality plaguing married couples today is the increasing divorce rate. Unfortunately, the results that follow a divorce may be worse than the dissolution of the marriage itself. Many side effects of divorce include loss of money, credit issues, depression and personal bankruptcy. Couples who divorce are more likely to experience financial complications in the months and years following the divorce. Perhaps this is because more couples are experiencing money problems even before the marriage dissolved, which potentially caused the divorce. Maybe it is just too difficult for them to adjust from two incomes to one and still maintain the same amount of monthly debt. In any event, there is no denying that divorce and money problems often coincide. Individuals who are recently divorced or who are considering it should take several factors into consideration regarding divorce and their credit score. Even if the other person is primarily to blame, simply obtaining a divorce will not protect someone from mounting financial problems.
Originally posted by Ephiram-Lo
reply to post by ThePiemaker
That's pretty much the gist of it, really. First Amdenment/Section Seven rights are fine and great, but having them isn't carte blanche to do wrong on others.
I'm amazed that that much even had to be decided by a court, really. Hereabouts people are just expected to know not to make jerks of themselves.
Originally posted by EverythingYouDespise
Gay rights = the rights for consenting adults to bang each other.
Christian rights = the rights to prevent strangers from doing with each other whatever they want.
See the difference?
With that said, I don't think taxpayer money should be spent on this sort of stupidity.
Originally posted by Lilitu
Getting back to the original topic, I think that gay rights do indeed trump christian rights. After all, nobody forced christianity on you. You chose it yourself, along with any attendant consequences. No gay person on the other hand chose to be gay, they were born that way. For the gay man or woman being gay is quite natural and wholesome. Gay rights are therefore more fundamental than religious rights.
Now I know the christian dead-enders won't agree with that but why should we take seriously grown men and women who cling to an imaginary friend?
Originally posted by mike3
"true" Christianity has not been around for at least 1500 years or more.
Originally posted by Lilitu
Now I know the Christian dead-enders won't agree with that but why should we take seriously grown men and women who cling to an imaginary friend?
Originally posted by resistor
Bigotry at its finest. I wonder why you don't have any links to anti Muslim, Hindu or Judaism sites in your sig?
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by resistor
Bigotry at its finest. I wonder why you don't have any links to anti Muslim, Hindu or Judaism sites in your sig?
I just have to jump in here. I personally do not find it odd that in this country a person focuses on Christianity. I suspect they probably feel the same way about all similar organized religious beliefs.
Just my logical opinion.
Originally posted by resistor
Assuming, and then speaking for another through such assumption is logical? Opinion, yes. Logical, no.
Originally posted by resistor
Assuming, and then speaking for another through such assumption is logical? Opinion, yes. Logical, no.
. . all religions. They are all damnable frauds. Here in the states however most religious delusion addicts are christians and they are by far the most annoying and egotistical. Their grandiose sense of entitlement is beyond anything I have ever witnessed. Sure there are muslims, jews, buddhists, hindus, etc. here in the states but they by and large do not force their religion or views down others throats. They for the most part keep to themselves. Christians are another matter entirely.
Over the years, a circle of Copeland's relatives and friends have done just that, The Associated Press has found. They include the brother-in-law with a lucrative deal to broker Copeland's television time, the son who acquired church-owned land for his ranching business and saw it more than quadruple in value, and board members who together have been paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for speaking at church events.
Church officials say no one improperly benefits through ties to Copeland's vast evangelical ministry, which claims more than 600,000 subscribers in 134 countries to its flagship "Believer's Voice of Victory" magazine. The board of directors signs off on important matters, they say. Yet church bylaws give Copeland veto power over board decisions.
While Copeland insists that his ministry complies with the law, independent tax experts who reviewed information obtained by the AP through interviews, church documents and public records have their doubts. The web of companies and non-profits tied to the televangelist calls the ministry's integrity into question, they say.
"There are far too many relatives here," said Frances Hill, a University of Miami law professor who specializes in nonprofit tax law. "There's too much money sloshing around and too much of it sloshing around with people with overlapping affiliations and allegiances by either blood or friendship or just ties over the years. There are red flags all over these relationships."
Copeland, 71, is a pioneer of the prosperity gospel, which holds that believers are destined to flourish spiritually, physically and financially — and share the wealth with others. His ministry's 1,500-acre campus, behind an iron gate a half-hour drive from Fort Worth, is testament to his success. It includes a church, a private airstrip, a hangar for the ministry's $17.5 million jet and other aircraft, and a $6 million church-owned lakefront mansion.
Kenneth Copeland Ministries is organized under the tax code as a church, so it gets a layer of privacy not afforded large secular and religious nonprofit groups that must disclose budgets and salaries. Pastors' pay must be "reasonable" under the federal tax code, a term that gives churches wide latitude.
Copeland's current salary is not made public by his ministry. However, the church disclosed in a property-tax exemption application that his wages were $364,577 in 1995; Copeland's wife, Gloria, earned $292,593. It's not clear whether those figures include other earnings, such as special offerings for guest preaching or book royalties. Another 13 Copeland relatives were on the church's payroll that year.
news.yahoo.com...
If each of us sweeps in front of our own steps, the whole world will be clean - Goethe
"The evil one". This term sounds primitive and medieval. Man is "evil" when he is hateful towards another. This is what I detest about "religious" people, they are constantly telling everyone how they should act, think, feel and behave.
If two consenting adults fall in love what in the sam hill business of yours is it! One's sexual preference should be a private matter. If two consenting adults fall in love and commit to a relationship YES they should be allowed the tax benefits, marriage contracts and everything else a heterosexual couple get.
I'm so tired of pompous religious fundamentalists trying to dictate how they think everyone should live the very personal parts of their lives out. People being so darn judgmental and hateful are the very aspects of what is wrong with humanity and have caused all the hell and heartbreak on this planet. LIVE AND LET LIVE