It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Tapped In
Do you seek to Debunk because you are trying to prove how smart you are or because you are looking for a grander truth in things...
The line is very fine...
Originally posted by Tapped In
reply to post by Threadfall
How many times must I say that I'm not in this for a battle. I cannot be provoked.
I would rather you all battled for your crumbling constitutional rights in the same manner you so vehemently call fraud to something you do not understand.
Originally posted by justpassingthrough
...
He has been right on a handful, but his whole "deviation" thing is not believable either. He needs this computer to bring back to his future, but there's no chance he's going back to his original timeline. This makes ZERO sense. So, he gets back to 2036 or whatever and come to find out he doesn't need this computer because his timeline changed enough that they actually figured the problem out. Now what? If he was truly a time traveler, there would be a surefire way to get back to your EXACT future and not some deviation, alternate timeline parallel universe or whatever.
...
Originally posted by roadgravel
Originally posted by justpassingthrough
...
He has been right on a handful, but his whole "deviation" thing is not believable either. He needs this computer to bring back to his future, but there's no chance he's going back to his original timeline. This makes ZERO sense. So, he gets back to 2036 or whatever and come to find out he doesn't need this computer because his timeline changed enough that they actually figured the problem out. Now what? If he was truly a time traveler, there would be a surefire way to get back to your EXACT future and not some deviation, alternate timeline parallel universe or whatever.
...
That sounds reasonable. Plus, if there is an uncertainty, why don't they send 10 or 20 people into the past to be sure the mission is accomplished. What about getting here and the timeline doesn't have the computer that is needed.
I don't care if the China Olympics happen or not. It won't effect my thinking in any way.
Originally posted by titorite
Imagine the timelines like this. He travels back to 78 to get that computer... He mentioned he even had to do a few tweaks to it and that may of darn well been because of the 2% divergence. Now fast forward the minimal impact he had there to 1999. when he started posting. From the point he began to post the divergence rate increases.
Now during the time of his postings he said he could not go back to his exact timeline but one so similar that the differences would be nil. I am thinking the return trip to the original time would have a divergence rate of something like .000002% When dealing with odds like that the rational scientist would agree that the other 100 timeslines on both sides of the originating timeline were probably gonna do the same thing. So what happenes is dozens and dozens of timelines trading out titors... Some of the titors that went back talked as ours did... others did not.
Originally posted by titorite
Imagine the timelines like this.