It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Acidtastic
I will never believe for even a second that we're all alone. Our tiny insignificant spec of a world is not the only life bearing planet out there. To think so is arrogant at best. If we're the best the universe has on display,then we may aswell switch the light off and all go home. Cos that's rubbish. And I don'tt hink that the universe is rubbish. It's a melting pot of life.
If the chance of life originating on any star is the same as flipping a coin 100 times and having it land on heads -- there is less than one chance in 1000 of life appearing ANWHERE in the universe**
Originally posted by Parabol
reply to post by Buck Division
If the chance of life originating on any star is the same as flipping a coin 100 times and having it land on heads -- there is less than one chance in 1000 of life appearing ANWHERE in the universe
Are you basing your logic off of an assumption you created that life occuring is the same as flipping a coin 100 times? Do you understand the difference between statistical coin flips and reality? Does that take into account atomic properties or the resilience of life we've seen on this planet? I could go on, but you get my point.
You can make a statistical estimate regarding the probabilities of life occurring for any given star system. I'm also saying that it COULD be astronomically improbable that life exists -- requiring astronomical numbers of stars to create even a single instance of life.
I make the ASSUMPTION, to illustrate my point, that there are 100 things that must occur for life to originate, and the probability of each event occurring is 50%. If each of these things is independent of the next, then the probability of all 100 things occurring is one chance in 10 raised to the 31st power (10 followed by 31 zeros.)
Yeah -- there is no basis for this assumption -- there may be 10 things, or 10,000 things. Who knows?
Finally, you mention atomic properties -- physical laws -- perhaps the possibility of atomic properties being as they are is also astronomically improbable? Just to get "out of the starting gate" might be incredibly unlikely.
Originally posted by Ryan Lloyd
Did anyone actually think that we could be the only intelligent life in this universe.
Originally posted by Parabol
Atoms, for lack of a better word, enjoy becoming stable. They trade and share electrons to balance their forces. The underlying structure for creating higher levels of organization is already written into the physical law. And a universe with such 'stable' laws may be improbable, but we're here.