It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by harvib
Its a ruse to indoctrinate the weak members of society. Don't fall for it. Deny Ignorance. There's no peace in Buddhism.
Indoctrinate how and with what ideals. I have never been solicitied by anyone but a Christian. When are we going to learn to stop looking at eachother with fear and suspicion. That my friend is the real danger.
There seems to be a new wave of fear being introduced into our society regarding other religions. Where is this coming from. Where did you come up with this theory OP?
Originally posted by SevenThunders
reply to post by rileytardell
What many Westerners don't realize is the hard core paganism that is wrapped up in a sugary coating of banal new age philosophies and sold to Westerners and Buddhism.
The philosophies are toxic, are directly opposed to christ and in it's extreme form give rise to various cult leaders like Eckart and his disciple Adolf Hitler.
These days one might see a new leader emerge with similar philosophies, say Maitreya. It seems that the agnostic west is willing to suspend judgment and believe anything that might teach you can be god, or that through your efforts you can merit favor from God, or improve your karma and eventually achieve godhood etc. etc..
Or in the case of Buddhism, once you fail miserably at being good you go to the priests or monks and get a spiritual uplift from them. Of course they are twice the sons of hell you are, so it's really a spiritual spiral downward.
Jesus teaches that salvation is unmerited. It can not be earned by any effort, beyond that of putting one's trust in Jesus, who did all the hard work for us and still does in regards to righteousness.
Special pleading is a form of spurious argumentation where a position in a dispute introduces favorable details or excludes unfavorable details by alleging a need to apply additional considerations without proper criticism of these considerations themselves. Essentially, this involves someone attempting to cite something as an exemption to a generally accepted rule, principle, etc. without justifying the exemption.
Originally posted by Bigwhammy
Well I doubt they want world domination. But they are corrupt from what I've seen. Its funny how the people who defend the Buddhists are the same ones that jump on the band wagon to bash Christians.
Sure not all Buddhists are bad, but their is obviously something wrong with a "peaceful" religion banning people form conversion. It's a logical fallacy to just completely excuse Buddhists. "if they were really buddhist they wouldn't do that" Fallacy of special pleading!
Special pleading is a form of spurious argumentation where a position in a dispute introduces favorable details or excludes unfavorable details by alleging a need to apply additional considerations without proper criticism of these considerations themselves. Essentially, this involves someone attempting to cite something as an exemption to a generally accepted rule, principle, etc. without justifying the exemption.
Originally posted by Gigantopithecus
One good thing that comes out of this, glad to know there are so many good people out there with different beliefs, background and race willing to defend against these hatemongers. Keep up the good work.
Originally posted by Gigantopithecus
Originally posted by Bigwhammy
Well I doubt they want world domination. But they are corrupt from what I've seen. Its funny how the people who defend the Buddhists are the same ones that jump on the band wagon to bash Christians.
Sure not all Buddhists are bad, but their is obviously something wrong with a "peaceful" religion banning people form conversion. It's a logical fallacy to just completely excuse Buddhists. "if they were really buddhist they wouldn't do that" Fallacy of special pleading!
Special pleading is a form of spurious argumentation where a position in a dispute introduces favorable details or excludes unfavorable details by alleging a need to apply additional considerations without proper criticism of these considerations themselves. Essentially, this involves someone attempting to cite something as an exemption to a generally accepted rule, principle, etc. without justifying the exemption.
What's wrong with you? You can't tell Rileytardell is a hatemonger and his thread are full of misinformation, misrepresentation and lies? Deny ignorance man. You are still making feeble attempts to justify him.
And goodness, you are always "not sure" in most of your post, why make so much effort to post then? Obviously you are not capable of understanding that the world is made up of all kinds of people. Religion doesn't guarantee all its followers to be good. Being good is down to the individual. There will always be bad apples around, just as there will be good Christians, Buddhists, Muslims, Hindus, Jews and others. The sooner you realised that, the sooner you will understand how the world really works. I am an agnostic, my kind got bashed all the time and by everybody. And by the way, there are also good agnostic around too.
Always look out for characters with sinister motives like Rileytardell. Deny them any opportunity to make this world a worse place to live, it's already bad enough. Never side them. Be faithful to yourself and your own belief. Let others be, leave them to their own beliefs. If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.
Originally posted by riley
Originally posted by Gigantopithecus
One good thing that comes out of this, glad to know there are so many good people out there with different beliefs, background and race willing to defend against these hatemongers. Keep up the good work.
It is heartening. Another good thing is actually speaking about the child slave trade.. while it's "over there" it doesn't really enter our minds. Humanity as a whole seems to have turned a blind eye to it.
Originally posted by bigbert81
Ah-ha! Well said.
BigWhammy DOES have a reputation however, of calling other's beliefs 'wrong' if they don't share the same views as he does, so to see him jumping on the attacking Buddhism train is no surprise at all, even if it's not Buddhism he should be concerned about, that's what he's going to choose to attack.
Well said, friend, good post.
igWhammy DOES have a reputation however, of calling other's beliefs 'wrong' if they don't share the same views as he does, so to see him jumping on the attacking Buddhism train is no surprise at all, even if it's not Buddhism he should be concerned about, that's what he's going to choose to attack.
Originally posted by Bigwhammy
reply to post by bigbert81
igWhammy DOES have a reputation however, of calling other's beliefs 'wrong' if they don't share the same views as he does, so to see him jumping on the attacking Buddhism train is no surprise at all, even if it's not Buddhism he should be concerned about, that's what he's going to choose to attack.
Attack no. Criticize yes.. and why not? That's what CIR is here for. The topic is Buddhism is it not? You criticize religion all the time bigbert. In fact , Bert you're the one with a thread saying lets do a way with religion!
And riley is an atheist. Is that rational to believe in Karma and reincarnation? What would Richard Dawkins say riley? Last time I checked Buddhism is a religion. I never called to ban any religion.
Can you say HYPOCRITES.
You both are.
[edit on 6/26/2008 by Bigwhammy]
Originally posted by Bigwhammy
I never bashed anything I never said all of Buddhism was doing anything. But some Buddhist are for sure! A lot of them are! If you try to deny it. It makes you look dishonest. I never said all of Buddhism that was the OP. Stop putting words in my mouth.
I just saw the evidence of what Buddhists are doing tin Sri Lanka i it is very bad and what you guys are doing is the fallacy of special pleading.
Funny the PC squad never defends Christians when we get bashed every day.