It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What's with the assumptions? Just because I am from America, I don't support the Native population? Stop trying to pass the buck.
That is not right, and I am tired of people justifying current violence because it was worse at one time.
Am I just not being clear about this? Why am I constantly being addressed as if I am demanding a reversal to an older time. Hell, my mention of the 'electing' of the Lama was asked as a, "did I hear that right" and I said it was a step in the right direction.
Don't assume that I am naive enough to assume that all of Tibets problems will be solved in one act of change.
Originally posted by zhangxi0183
What's with the assumptions? Just because I am from America, I don't support the Native population? Stop trying to pass the buck.
then stop oppressing the indian, let them independent.
Originally posted by spines
Originally posted by zhangxi0183
What's with the assumptions? Just because I am from America, I don't support the Native population? Stop trying to pass the buck.
then stop oppressing the indian, let them independent.
Are you being serious at this point or just trolling your own threads?
Originally posted by zhangxi0183
you mean you would rather listen to dalailama's lies than support indian's rights?
Originally posted by spines
reply to post by zhangxi0183
Originally posted by zhangxi0183
you mean you would rather listen to dalailama's lies than support indian's rights?
Last post in direct response to the OP:
I never said that I do not support the rights of the Native Americans. It is now pretty clear, to me, that you are trolling around. Why else would you pull assumptions out of left field, instead of actually discussing the topic of your thread.
[edit on 6/18/0808 by spines]
Originally posted by zhangxi0183
hmm...you assure me... by what? by the decades of unbreakable political law of Red evil China propaganda?
people used to say "Hear all parties". that means Listen to both sides and you will be enlightened. Heed only one side and you will be benighted.
watch out. there are many people in China can read english. but can you read Chinese? i doubt.
do you really believe that the western meida feeding you is the fact? or the urge of bashing China take over your mind?
Originally posted by srsenEDIT TO ADD:
I also find it interesting that only months after the wholesale slaughter of many Buddhist Monks in China, the Dalai Lama embarks on an apparent world tour.
Interesting…
[edit on 19-6-2008 by srsen]
My thoughts upon leaving the talk was that he would make a great figurehead – a new pope if you like – for a new centralized religion of, say, the NWO.
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
Guy got a lot of money from the CIA and that's an irrefutable fact.
Another fact is he trained "a resistance movement" in the USA.
Yes, a very peaceful man, indeed.
How much more evidence do you need to realise that there is something not right with his (media constructed) public image?
And I'm not siding with China here at all... nor with the USA side of the story.. I'm just observing, objectively.
Originally posted by Dragonfly79
How can you know that he receives funds from the CIA for sure? Do you have access to his bank account? What are you suggesting, he receives money from the CIA, they are bad and violent and so is the Dalai Lama?
Originally posted by Dragonfly79
Where's a source on training a resistance movement? What kind of resistance, via diplomatic talks or do you have some secret photograph of him training with guns? Do you have any idea at all what you're talking about or have sources?
Originally posted by Dragonfly79
What evidence? Sources, links do you have anything at all?