It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dragonridr
Most of the reason were still paying high gas prices is a weak dollar there are other factors such as supply. We have needed to build new refineries for decades but that goes in to not my back yard. However in spite of that if we had a strong dollar especially with problems in Europe are gas would be really cheap. You cant just print money without side effects and the side effect is inflation your seeing it at the pump and in our grocery stores.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Aim64C
yep..."set or maintain prices"...well well isn't that just cute...set a price ceiling and interfere with the working of the free market, then tax tax and more tax, which of course the consumer has to pay. Thanks Democrats.
A price ceiling is a government-imposed limit on the price charged for a product. Governments intend price ceilings to protect consumers from conditions that could make necessary commodities unattainable. However, a price ceiling can cause problems if imposed for a long period without controlled rationing. Price ceilings can produce negative results when the correct solution would have been to increase supply. Misuse occurs when a government misdiagnoses a price as too high when the real problem is that the supply is too low. In an unregulated market economy price ceilings do not exist. Students may incorrectly perceive a price ceiling as being on top of a supply and demand curve when in fact, an effective price ceiling is positioned below the equilibrium position on the graph.
Originally posted by Janky Red
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Aim64C
yep..."set or maintain prices"...well well isn't that just cute...set a price ceiling and interfere with the working of the free market, then tax tax and more tax, which of course the consumer has to pay. Thanks Democrats.
The speculation and the gouging was confirmed as suspected...
Trillion dollars later and here you are defending the people who ripped you off
It is funny how it is not a free market when it suits the argument, but when it protects
the face of corporations, like you are doing, it is a free market.
Fact is, it is NOT a free market,because multiple forces regulate it that are not in the U.S's control.
You tell me you are not pro corporate, but you defend them even when you have been a target.
That is just stupid frankly
Fight the urge of idiocyedit on 18-9-2011 by Janky Red because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Janky Red
Tell me how a market pricing outside of the control of US is going to be controlled by putting a price ceiling on gas sold in the US???
It is a known fact that setting either price ceilings or price floors are govt control of the market. Thus it interferes with the free market flow.
A price ceiling is a government-imposed limit on the price charged for a product. Governments intend price ceilings to protect consumers from conditions that could make necessary commodities unattainable. However, a price ceiling can cause problems if imposed for a long period without controlled rationing. Price ceilings can produce negative results when the correct solution would have been to increase supply. Misuse occurs when a government misdiagnoses a price as too high when the real problem is that the supply is too low. In an unregulated market economy price ceilings do not exist. Students may incorrectly perceive a price ceiling as being on top of a supply and demand curve when in fact, an effective price ceiling is positioned below the equilibrium position on the graph.
en.wikipedia.org...
graph on page also depicting the euilibrium between prices and supply and demandedit on 18-9-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)edit on 18-9-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
It is NOT an accident that the most ENERGY connected White House oversaw the most overly inflated prices in
A price ceiling set below the free-market price has several effects. Suppliers find they can't charge what they had been. As a result, some suppliers drop out of the market. This reduces supply. Meanwhile, consumers find they can now buy the product for less, so quantity demanded increases. These two actions cause quantity demanded to exceed quantity supplied, which causes a shortage—unless rationing or other consumption controls are enforced. It can also lead to various forms of non-price competition so supply can meet demand.
Who's paying what: Most Europeans, including the British, the Irish, the Germans, the Italians and the French, pay somewhere between $7.50 and $8 per gallon, according to the International Energy
Norway is awash in oil because of its thriving oil industry in the North Atlantic. The United Kingdom also has access to the oil fields in the same region.
Italy has deep corporate ties with Libya. Its oil production company, Eni, is the largest producer in Libya. But even in the best of times, without civil war in Libya, gas in Italy is expensive when compared to the U.S. Italians on average paid $7.77 a gallon at the end of February, according to the most recent data from the IEA.
"The difference between countries comes down to taxes and subsidies," said Tom Kloza, the chief oil analyst for Oil Price Information Service. "Prices are incredibly high in Europe because of the stiff taxes that EU countries put on fuel. The same holds true for many other countries.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Janky Red
It is NOT an accident that the most ENERGY connected White House oversaw the most overly inflated prices in
ah ok let's not talk about the taxpayers subsidizng the now bankrupt Solar co chosen by current WH occupants because they keep hoping they can ramp up Green Energy and make their environmentally concerned base happy. What's that you say about crony capitalism...loledit on 18-9-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Janky Red
Are you kidding me? You think that the govt putting artificial price fixing on an industry which has multi national markets and slapping taxes on corporations is a straw man argument? It's the base of the legislation. Your argument is the straw man...ie the idea that govt can control pricing and keep things competitive at the same time. But that is not the goal of this admin really, because what it will do is interfere with the mechanism of the free market. It is not a straw man, it is simple economics.
Simple economics is not a straw man argument. You just didn't understand how the market works.
A price ceiling set below the free-market price has several effects. Suppliers find they can't charge what they had been. As a result, some suppliers drop out of the market. This reduces supply. Meanwhile, consumers find they can now buy the product for less, so quantity demanded increases. These two actions cause quantity demanded to exceed quantity supplied, which causes a shortage—unless rationing or other consumption controls are enforced. It can also lead to various forms of non-price competition so supply can meet demand.
en.wikipedia.org...
Did you learn anything from the failing of the former USSR and all the bread lines due to shortages from the centralized planning of the means of production?edit on 18-9-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by dragonridr
reply to post by Janky Red
You really are showing a lack of understanding when it comes to commerce. Oil prices are set by bench marks. Im sure youve heard of brent crude but do you understand it? Well where and who you buy your oil from does make a difference. Brent crude is from the north sea as a general rule tends to be more expensive and it is used to price two thirds of the world's internationally traded crude oil supplies. Other benchmarks are OPEC Reference Basket, Dubai Crude and West Texas Intermediate all these benchmarks are set so no matter where the oil comes from it can be priced. Now as i stated earlier Brent crude is the top of the barrel and most expensive is still currently over $100.00 a barrel last i checked about 115.00. but the new your stock exchange is based on WTI currently around 85.00 a barrel. So in the US theres a place called cushing ever heard of it? Its in oklahoma and it is a trading hub for the United States. So why am i telling you this you ask?
Simple there are a couple of factors leading to high prices 1 inflation which i all ready mentioned in previous post.
Now back to cushing oklahoma they are pumping as much oil as they can this is the WTI however demand has far outstripped supply in the US. This causes refineries to use the more expensive brent crude thus were not seeing those price drops. The only way this price drops will occur is if more drilling happens in the US this would allow cushing to handle more of the demand and allow the refineries to buy at a lower cost.
Your simplistic view of economics you forgot the most basic rule supply and demand.We will not see cheaper gas prices until we start drilling for more oil in the US and under the current administration id say thats not likely. And dont try to make a conspiracy when you dont understand world markets just makes you look silly.
And for people that want to learn heres the current prices for the different types of crude.
www.bloomberg.com...
Also I have provided a link to a video with the big five OIL Senate Judiciary Cmte. hearing on Rising Crude Oil Prices.
I remember tuning in on cspan to watch this,,, You will be amazed to hear what comes from mouth of John Hofmeister, president and U.S. country chairman, Shell Oil Co( the only honest one of the five) -
paraphrased - he said that if you take out the market speculation and the geo political
concerns that oil can (without speculation) be produced, shipped at about 40 - 60 dollars a barrel -
all the other members cited 130 - 170 a barrel !
Last month, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) leaked confidential data about oil speculation to a number of media outlets, including the Wall Street Journal. Ordinarily, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the regulatory body that oversees futures trading, does not provide identities of speculators to the public. However, the data leaked by Sanders provides a rare snapshot into the trading volumes by major speculators right before the oil price spike in the summer of 2008.
As experts from Stanford University, Rice University, the University of Massachusetts, and authorities have concluded, rampant oil speculation was the prime driver of the record high prices for crude oil three years ago.
The American people have a right to know exactly who caused gas prices to skyrocket in 2008 and who is causing them to spike today." Sanders is an Independent who usually supports Democratic Party positions in the Senate.
"This report clearly shows that in the summer of 2008 when gas prices spiked to more than $4 a gallon,Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and other speculators on Wall Street dominated the crude oil futures market causing tremendous damage to the entire economy," Sanders said, in a statement. "The CFTC has kept this information hidden from the American public for nearly three years. That is an outrage."
As an oil front group tours the country trying to convince Americans that oil companies aren’t responsible for high gas prices, House Republicans are celebrating the one-year anniversary of Rep. Joe Barton’s (R-TX) apology to BP (coming up this Friday!) by going to bat for the Wall Street speculators and oil traders that are artificially driving up the price of oil (and gas). Here’s a rundown of the action unfolding.