It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TKainZero
reply to post by bodrul
The legal effects of the constituion may stop when you leave the US soil.
But the free thought of the mind and free actions of one does not stop.
I would rather Americans have the 'label' of being rude, rather then being a nation of whimps.
Is shooting the quran a good way to make muslem friends, probaly not.
Is it a good way to express you freedom, probaly...
Question? Is it illigal to shoot the quran in Iraq or other muslem countries? Or is it against Mulesm religion?
Various studies of Muslim terrorists show that most are not graduates of madrassahs but of private or public schools and universities; most are from middle- and working-class backgrounds; some are devout and others are not. This survey confirms these findings:
•Among the Muslims surveyed, 7 percent condoned the 9/11 attacks. The study terms these the "politically radicalized."
•When asked why they supported the attacks, the radicals gave political rather than religious reasons. They have a sense of political frustration and feel humiliated and threatened by the West. Those who opposed the attacks often gave religious reasons for doing so.
•The radicals, on average, are not the down-and-out people in society. They are more educated than moderates, and two-thirds of radicals have average or above-average income. Forty-seven percent supervise others at work. They are more optimistic about their own lives than are moderates (52 percent to 45 percent).
•Radicals are no more religious than the general population and do not attend mosque more frequently.
•What distinguishes them is not their perception of Western culture or freedoms, but their perception of US policies. Even radicals say they support democracy. But 63 percent of radicals do not believe that the United States will allow people in the region to fashion their own political future without direct US influence.
Originally posted by proteus33
its a flippin book get over it already. its not like its the last copy. if that soldier was trying to make a point by doing this shouldn't his right to express himself be protected under first amendment. i do understand we are over there illegally to limit oil production to keep profits high for oil companies. and no i am not a muslim hater. but its a book last year they wanted to kill a teacher because she picked up a klids backpack that contained supposedly a quran. in my opinion to many people bend over backwards trying to appease muslims. true soldier had poor taste in targets but at least he wasn't using iraqi civilians
Originally posted by ninecrimes
Would it have been OK if he was shooting The Holy Bible?
How about "Of Mice and Men" or "Silence of the Lambs"?
It's a book... get over it, people.
Anyone upset over this needs to look in the mirror and take control of their own life. It seems very petty for anyone to judge someone else for not respecting a book, like they think they should.
The bottom line: this man shot a book that meant nothing to him. If you think he should be punished, then I think YOU should be punished!
Originally posted by dariousg
Originally posted by ninecrimes
Would it have been OK if he was shooting The Holy Bible?
How about "Of Mice and Men" or "Silence of the Lambs"?
It's a book... get over it, people.
Anyone upset over this needs to look in the mirror and take control of their own life. It seems very petty for anyone to judge someone else for not respecting a book, like they think they should.
The bottom line: this man shot a book that meant nothing to him. If you think he should be punished, then I think YOU should be punished!
You see, this stance is fine for those of us that hold no value in the book. What you all that are taking this stance are ignoring is the very real fact that there are 1 billion people that DO hold this book VERY close to their hearts and revere it. To them it is MUCH more than a book. So when someone who is representing our nation as a whole, a nation made up of ALL religions and ALL nations, goes and does something like this it becomes much more than someone just shooting a book.
If you can't see that then you are purposefully being ignorant on this very sensative subject. What he did was wrong. Does he deserve to serve prison time for it? Hell no. Would he have if he had done it and was a citizen of the country he did it in? Probably. He would have also been lashed. And in some other countries he would have been executed.
You see, just because it means nothing to you does not make this a trivial experience. It's actually quite serious and I think he should be seriously reprimanded at the least for it. He is representing our nation that has already had its image damaged way too much over the past couple decades in the world's view.
Originally posted by vor78
While I disagree with his actions, he has freedom of speech and expression as protected by the First Amendment.
Originally posted by CRB86
Originally posted by vor78
While I disagree with his actions, he has freedom of speech and expression as protected by the First Amendment.
I know this may come as a shock to you, but your constitution doesn't apply outside America. I will leave you to try and get your head around that earth-shattering revelation.
[edit on 21-7-2009 by CRB86]
Originally posted by Sky watcher
reply to post by WickedStar
If you were getting shot at by the peaceful Muslims everyday do you think you would give two craps about their satanic book?
I would burn every copy I got my hands on because it is a work of the devil.
then its equally ok for an Iraqi to do the same to the Jew's and Christian's
burn every copy I got my hands on because it is a work of the devil
.
satanic book