It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Amaterasu
truth is, the u2u exchange between Nomadrush and myself is quite the opposite of what he claims. His response to the automated u2u one gets from an offtopic tag was childish and rude and I responded with a single line offering to return his points since the offtopic post was then deleted by a higher up. his response was more of the same and then I explained the issue regarding his offtopic post and told him I was going to overlook the snide remarks in the previous u2u's.
Was all this before or after the "legalese" U2U he posted on his blog that informed him of a deal that precluded the continuation of the then present arrangement?
I suspect it was after... And I can assure you that from the moment that original U2U was received, all behavior was driven by pain and, though poor, as I have said, still understandable.
Originally posted by Crakeur
what was it he called me....oh, yeah, I know. can't say it here.
Originally posted by Amaterasu
I agree that his choice of behavior was poor. But I also think that in boiling it down, one must also include the fact that ATS failed to act on a personal level, terminating the arrangement with nomadrush abruptly and with no sensitivity for his point of view.
Both sides chose poorly.
Agreed, but when one feels hurt by what appears to be cavalier dismissal, this is not an unexpected behavior. Poor choice, yes. Unexpected, no.
Originally posted by dodgygeeza
Are you even talking about the right person? I believe my questions and proposals were perfectly rational.
I was only responding to your obvious arse-kissing and offering a sensible perspective, rather than being the 'teachers pet'.
Either way, this no longer concerns me.
Originally posted by dodgygeeza
reply to post by Gemwolf
Ok, in that case can my thread be re-opened.
As it stands at the moment, "Everyone has their price, don't they ATS" is front page and has been flagged 70 times since yesterday. They see my post, asking for the thread not to be closed (which it quickly is) and to top it off there is no explaination or rebuttal from the staff. So instead, this appears to other ATS members that I was infact correct and that my thread has been censored (look at its popularity). In short, it doesn't help you guys at all.
In my opinion it should be reopended so this can be put to bed in a public fashion, rather than in the 'back rooms' of ATS.
I hope you understand what I mean.
Originally posted by Corum
Really my point is this, the site owners/managers e.c.t keep telling us that ''members come first'' and that without members ATS wouldn't exist yet we are not allowed to have any say about anything here
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Originally posted by Amaterasu
I agree that his choice of behavior was poor. But I also think that in boiling it down, one must also include the fact that ATS failed to act on a personal level, terminating the arrangement with nomadrush abruptly and with no sensitivity for his point of view.
Are you refusing to read what I post?
The loose agreement was in no way "terminated abruptly." As soon as the nature of the exclusivity in our deal was apparent, we informed Ross we needed to gracefully curtail his forum within 14 days. How on earth can you consider such a thing abrupt?
Originally posted by Crakeur
Originally posted by Amaterasu
truth is, the u2u exchange between Nomadrush and myself is quite the opposite of what he claims. His response to the automated u2u one gets from an offtopic tag was childish and rude and I responded with a single line offering to return his points since the offtopic post was then deleted by a higher up. his response was more of the same and then I explained the issue regarding his offtopic post and told him I was going to overlook the snide remarks in the previous u2u's.
Was all this before or after the "legalese" U2U he posted on his blog that informed him of a deal that precluded the continuation of the then present arrangement?
I suspect it was after... And I can assure you that from the moment that original U2U was received, all behavior was driven by pain and, though poor, as I have said, still understandable.
suspect wrong.
Originally posted by Obliv_au
when i fit my anti-spin doctor glasses i read it as
new cash deal...or.... long term member and ATS supporter....
Originally posted by Hot_Wings
I think that’s great. But how do we go about providing that content in light of new corporate agreements? I don’t want to create multimedia content and feel mislead or used and dumped as people are suggesting that Ross was. I don’t think that Ross was given the shaft, but I do admit that I don’t know what the deal is as far as posting multimedia content.
Where can I go to learn more about all this?
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
new cash deal...or.... long term member and ATS supporter....
As has been stated many times... WE were a supporter of Now That's Weird, not the other way around. WE provided free technology, free forum, free moderation, free promotion and asked nothing in return.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
You likely missed our gala event at the Hotel Gansevort in Manhattan, last year on November 5th.