It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord We offer and enthusiastically tolerate methods for public questions of our operations and tactics here on ATS. The ATS Issues thread is a recent development intended to maintain a single-source and easy to locate place for a broad variety of concerns and questions. We've never shied away from valid questions and never intend to. For anyone who wishes to raise issues, please do so here and you will receive an answer.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
It's reflected in our joining the Internet Advertising Bureau and serving on their small publisher committee, and soon to be even more obvious through certification of a leading digital privacy advocacy organization. We take seriously the public trust we ask of our members and visitors.
For those who continue to cowardly post lies and stories from the safety of their blogs and forums
Originally posted by B.Morrison
Thats groovy man, but have you ever noticed that the logo of the IAB, is a freakin eye?
looks a lot like 'all seeing eye' symbolism?
Originally posted by MemoryShock
Originally posted by B.Morrison
Thats groovy man, but have you ever noticed that the logo of the IAB, is a freakin eye?
looks a lot like 'all seeing eye' symbolism?
Do you really think that the Illuminati envisioned a day where instantaneous global communication and analysis of global events/symbology was possible?
If they did...then we are all apart of it and finally being included. Which means the quality of communication is our responsibility and not up to the 'powers that be'.
If not...then the reality of the level of communication within this website is something that the 'all seeing eye' didn't anticipate and harping on symbology (which is all over the place anyway) is a waste of our time...
Re: IS OM the new ATS
Postby Access Denied on Sun Oct 12, 2008 4:59 pm
torbjon wrote:and RU is better than them other sites because...?
Straw man… Ryan never said RU was better.
If we were better than ATS we would have more than the 100 threads they have about Blossom Goodchild instead of only one.
If we were better than OM we would have more than the 1000 threads they have about the Drones instead of only one.
If we were better than (fill in the blank) we would have more than 10 active threads.
torbjon wrote:Let's face it; we're ALL bozos on this bus.
Now THAT is Reality Uncovered.
torbjon wrote:Viva la différence!
Amen.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
reply to post by B.Morrison
Keep in mind that data mining, currently and in my opinion, is an imperfect amalgam of personality profiles based on imperfect comprehension of personal motivation/connotation (internet data mining is based on habits and key terms).
The discussion forum we have here is moderated for civility and for the discussion...meaning we are encouraging people to vette ideas and concepts...
penultimate
See how a simple pronoun may require further explanation to specify intent of meaning?
Symbology does not denote affiliation. True logic statement there...
Originally posted by B.Morrison
what a bunch of bollocks.
-B.M
It was a set up, involving a classic use of a planted instigator, a previously unseen member who was supposedly registered in 2007, and then during one of the discussions his registration date all the sudden changed to 2004, and his ATS “points” shut up like he just robbed a bank.
Originally posted by zazzafrazz
reply to post by B.Morrison
Why should they provide answers based on a spurned banned members comment on a site that has nothing to do with ATS?
a previously unseen member who was supposedly registered in 2007, and then during one of the discussions his registration date all the sudden changed to 2004
Originally posted by B.Morrison
I specifically refer to the quoted text. I would like some evidence either way to the validity of the statement, the accuracy of it.
Originally posted by B.Morrison
not the point. the point is a civilian may become a threat and at that point a simple collection of personal data will find them and they can be 'dealt' with, I don't care if data mining is flawed or not, if they get your home address (all the idiots on facebook for e.g.) and you happen to be home, then they've 'got' you. I'm not suggesting its a frequent reality, but I'm not dismissing the possibility entirely either.
Originally posted by B.Morrison
I specifically refer to the quoted text. I would like some evidence either way to the validity of the statement, the accuracy of it. Because THAT is a very interesting statement indeed. First & only thing I've seen at any of these Anti-ATS threads that actually caused some concern.
Originally posted by B.Morrison
Symbology does not denote affiliation. True logic statement there...
It does during the process of lucid dreaming. true logic statement there
hehe..