It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
1) Maybe the reason that those who have undying loyalty to the official position remain mute, is because the truth movement never brings anything viable to the argument. It's always the same old anonymous so and so from such and such organization making sensational claims with nothing to back it up. Like you have just done.'
2) Oh great, more of the government controls the media nonsense. What about the family members who helped on the Flight 93 docudrama? Are they controlled by the government also?
3) How can an untrained eye recognize something that is false when they are untrained to recognize what is true?
4) The FDR and CVR found at the crash site are as about as rocksolid as you can get.
"Pilots for 9/11 Truth received documents from the NTSB and began a close analysis of the data they contain. After expert review and cross check, Pilots for 9/11 Truth has concluded that the information in these NTSB documents does not support, and in some instances factually contradicts, the official government position that United Airlines Flight 93 created the impact crater as reported, in Somerset County, PA on the morning of September 11, 2001 .According to the US Govt, United Airlines Flight 93 approached Somerset County from the North-Northwest at a high altitude on the morning of September 11, 2001 . However, many witnesses contradict altitude as well as approach path. Also according to reports, and as the impact crater suggests, United Airlines Flight 93 impacted terrain at an almost vertical 90 degree angle, while the Flight Data Recorder shows a 35 degree angle with up-sloping terrain, further reducing impact angle."
5) What about the family members? Are they propagating and strengthening lies? Or were they controlled by the government also?
Originally posted by Sovereign797
I just have a comment to make to anyone who thinks they have 'inside' information from someone with 'secret' clearance.
Everyone, every single person in the Air Force is capable of Secret clearance. Most have it. I have Secret clearance but that doesn't mean I know anything about anything but what pertains to me directly.
"Need to know" is a much more powerful claim on information than is having a clearance. Because even if you have Top Secret/SCI, you won't get access to any information that you don't have a specific 'need to know.'
Just had to put that out there, pet peeve of mine when clearance gets thrown out there to validate evidence.
Names would be helpful, but a believable story would be much better.
originally posted by Maxmars
Perhaps I do not have the name of the NSOC/NSA personnel to confirm this. I can only infer that you will believe named individuals. I will recall and make use this forceful logic tool
Speaking of generalizations
originally posted by Maxmars
Great generalization.
originally posted by Maxmars
There is NO press in this country. We need a free press. Without it our democracy is hamstrung - the press was as fundamental to our freedom in the 1700's as it is crucial to our freedom today.
Nope, it's a valid argument.
That's a bit sophistic wasn't it?
Apparently so. You are the one that said, "information that even untrained eyes recognized as patently false." The question still stands.
Was my point unclear?
I've read the press release and watched PBB3. A whole lot of witness cherry picking and, as far as I know, Rob Balsamo is not a trained accident investigator. Once again, if someone is not trained to recognize a crash scene, how do they know that it does not match the official story?
By virtue of the fact that only information you provide is factual, my counter will be an exercise in futility but for starters
from: UA93_Press_Release.html
What ABOUT the family members? Are you suggesting they know anything other than they were told? I don't think stepping on their grief is really the issue here - so lay off the derisive nonsense.
Originally posted by Sovereign797
I just have a comment to make to anyone who thinks they have 'inside' information from someone with 'secret' clearance.
Everyone, every single person in the Air Force is capable of Secret clearance. Most have it. I have Secret clearance but that doesn't mean I know anything about anything but what pertains to me directly.
"Need to know" is a much more powerful claim on information than is having a clearance. Because even if you have Top Secret/SCI, you won't get access to any information that you don't have a specific 'need to know.'
Just had to put that out there, pet peeve of mine when clearance gets thrown out there to validate evidence.
Originally posted by Boone 870
reply to post by Maxmars
Names would be helpful, but a believable story would be much better.
Oh great, more of the government controls the media nonsense.
How the government 'cooperated' with the media to produce and promote the heartrending "Flight 93" docudrama that served to cement public opinion against the truth and truth-seekers as lunatics with possible 'unpatriotic' motivations
Speaking of generalizations
originally posted by Maxmars
There is NO press in this country. We need a free press. Without it our democracy is hamstrung - the press was as fundamental to our freedom in the 1700's as it is crucial to our freedom today.
How can an untrained eye recognize something that is false when they are untrained to recognize what is true?
I've read the press release and watched PBB3. A whole lot of witness cherry picking and, as far as I know, Rob Balsamo is not a trained accident investigator. Once again, if someone is not trained to recognize a crash scene, how do they know that it does not match the official story?
Originally posted by bovarcher
There was a flight 93; there was no plane.
F93 crashed at Shanksville; no plane crashed at Shanksville.
F93 was shot down by an air-to-air missile; there was no plane so it couldn't have been shot down.
F93 was brought down by the passengers; no it wasn't, it was shot down.
After 7 years, if someone wanted to choose a CT belief-system to buy into, where are they supposed to start?
Truthers disunite! As long as all this nonsense continues, the '9/11 Truth Movement' will remain marginalized and ridiculed.
Get yer act together guys. Please.
Originally posted by _Del_
Why we would do that if we also caused the catastrophes elsewhere, as is commonly alleged, is beyond me.
Originally posted by Griff
Originally posted by Sovereign797
I just have a comment to make to anyone who thinks they have 'inside' information from someone with 'secret' clearance.
Everyone, every single person in the Air Force is capable of Secret clearance. Most have it. I have Secret clearance but that doesn't mean I know anything about anything but what pertains to me directly.
"Need to know" is a much more powerful claim on information than is having a clearance. Because even if you have Top Secret/SCI, you won't get access to any information that you don't have a specific 'need to know.'
Just had to put that out there, pet peeve of mine when clearance gets thrown out there to validate evidence.
I think this response is perfect to show how "compartmentalization" is done and why there would not need to be "thousands" of people "in the know" for a psy-op (if it was one) like this to be accomplished.
But, everyone (the debunkers) thinks that when we say "inside job" it means the whole freeking government. Or that is a strawman tactic that they throw out there to easily debunk.