reply to post by rizla
I don't have to personally test anything. If someone else has, then I don't have to. That's the beauty of the scientific method. If it wasn't
the case, I'd have to test that gravity and EM fields worked every day before I could interact with objects without worrying whether they'll shoot
off into space or turn into jelly.
Enough research has been performed into Ouija boards that this discussion is pointless. Saying Ouija boards are supernatural is flogging a very dead
(and uncontactable) horse.
As for your claims about the "early developers of the scientific method", I'd very much like to see your evidence for that. The scientific method,
as everyone else on the planet understands, is based on observable effects. If something is observable (as you claim it is, that it can affect the
physical world), then science can most definitely get to the bottom of it. The only things science can't deal with are things that have absolutely
no effect on the world. As you know Chi is real, clearly you think it can affect the physical world.
If you know Chi is real, go do Randi's test, get your $1m, and give it to charity. If not, you're either full of it, or selfish. I wish there was
a third option - maybe you can explain it to me.
Your own experiences are NOT scientific evidence. They might be good enough to form a hypotheses, but not good enough to form a theory. No scientist
in the world works that way, as it's contrary to the scientific method.
I'm not embracing ignorance. I'm embracing the hundreds of years of the perfectly-functioning scientific method, and the countless studies into
"paranormal" occurences which turn out,
every single time, to be the misguided interpretation of phenomena with mundane explanations, by
people who simply didn't know better, and put full trust in their own experiences, instead of carrying out
independently verifiable
experiments, which are the cornerstone of the scientific theory.
So, in short, it's up to you to demonstrate it happens, in a controlled environment, before anyone should believe it. It's not up to me, or anyone
else, to perform these experiments, as it's impossible to prove a negative. You make the claims, you put up the evidence.