It is like that movie with Stallone and Snipes ... 'Demolition Man'
I am all for rights and freedoms ... but I am also for public decency.
Why do you all have such a need an desire to use vulgar language? Why is it to a point you must use it in written word as well?
If you want to make a point or exclamation, wit is a much better way to stick it to your adversary than an unintelligent outburst of anger and
profanity.
Don't get me wrong, I love the comedy stylings of George Carlin.
I grew up in a house where the father used a swear word or two just about every sentence. I ended up being very fluent in the language or
foul-mouth-ness prior to 5 year old. I always knew how and when to use it, as in not in public.
If swearing is so great, next time you have an interview for a job, when the person asks how you are, say 'Fine, and how the F$#^ are you? Or, go to
a PTA meeting and have the teacher say your kid is acting like a little B$%^#.
Profanity is just uncouth and really has no need in our
public vocabulary. I don't see how it is much of a freedom of speech issue, since
your ideas and message are't being restrained, just vulgar words within that message.
Another thing, if you are not using swearing as an uncontrolled expression, then you are doing it for attention ... which is far worse of an offense
than the swearing itself. Attention [whore]s are quite pathetic, since they need so much approval or at least the need to be noticed by others that
shows they don't have enough self-respect or respect from the current people in their life to satisfy them. Most people don't find cursing to be
'cool'. Most people don't think, 'wow, that guy said the f-word ... he must be brilliant and sophisticated' ... emotionally charged words?
:lmao: have fun, but I find a speech of passion without swearing to be much more emotionally motivating than one with its use.
Imagine if MLK Jr said 'I have a #ing dream, that all mf'ers are created equal', not quite as emotionally charged and motivating, is it now?
When I watch 'Gordon Ramsey's Kitchen Nightmares', I don't have any more respect for him cursing every other word. He could very well get his
same point across just as effective without the use of it. In fact, he might get his point across better if he didn't, since some people have a
negative reaction to the swearing. He is not being any more crass or offensive using the words, in fact, I don't think he uses them as emotionally
charged words, it is just so common to him he cannot control it much.
Basically, do you oppose having your 2 year old using those words freely? If so, then you essentially agree with this law. Do you agree with these
words being used freely in front of your 2 year old? If not, then you agree with this law. (Imagine you have one if you don't.)
This isn't religious morality. It isn't about curbing your rights (PATRIOT Act is much more of a burden, as well as wiretapping, the president
vetoing the ban on torture). It is about having a level of self-respect and decency in daily life and in the world.
Online, even here, why not put in the censor yourself if you must use the expression ... # off, shut the # up, get the # out, kiss my # ... wow,
that sounds so intelligent and kind, does it not?
I have never felt better after a swear session, and in my lifetime, have had many. It basically comes down to one not having control of one's temper
and frustrations. I don't expect people to be a 'Christine Sullivan' from 'Night Court' ... but, really ... a bit of calmness and respect goes
a long way into bettering this world ... not by some silly law as this one, but as a common idea amongst the people that is adhered to.
Though, if the people of a community agree and wish for this law, it is their right to have it on their books. To tell them they cannot is
suppressing their rights. If you don't agree with the laws of a place, generally you don't move there. There are quite a lot of people who would
love to live in a profanity-free community and would move there in a heartbeat ... those who feel it would be a burden on their lives should stay
away instead of whining and wanting to change it.
I don't agree with communities that have laws on how many cars you can have, where you can park a boat, and other crazy crap like that. My neighbor
had to start parking his boat in a neighbors back yard because of a stupid city ordinance. The boat never affected me sitting in their yard. Their
fence had no opening big enough to put it in the back of their house. I also don't agree with communities that limit the colors you can paint your
house, or have to have your yard cared for in a particular way ... it is silly, since it is your house and your rights, but some give them up for a
certain look or way that they find acceptable. We have a lot of that in FL with the retired communities and some of the rich subdivisions. I choose
to live in the community or city to which I agree with the rules, or they have no direct effect on me.
I hope every one of you arguing against this cussing rule is also fighting the anti-smoking campaign. It is the smoker's right to smoke, their right
to smoke in public, their right to smoke in a club or bar, their right to smoke when they eat. I don't smoke personally, but I never had a problem
sitting with a smoker when they could smoke inside. Never had a problem with the restaurants that didn't separate seating, and commended the ones
that did. Instead of banning smoking, all they had to do was require air cleaners with a minimum flow rate per square footage and a separation of
sections. It is a shame someone I am with has to step outside and walk off 100 ft or so to smoke a cigarette. This also means I must go with them,
since I am usually with females who would not feel comfortable walking 100 ft from the door of an establishment at night alone.
One last argument that I feel fits in line with this. Public nudity. It is natural. We all have the same parts basically. Why have laws against
public nudity? It doesn't hurt anyone. The human body is a piece of art. You could choose if you were nude or not, some people are nudists, to ban
nudity is limiting those peoples rights and freedoms. Then you can get into drug use, but I won't since that would lead to T&C violations, but the
same goes, those peoples' rights are being withheld, you don't have to do it, if they could get it legally, there wouldn't be the need to commit
crime for it, at least no more than people commit crime to obtain alcohol.
You cannot fight one cause without fighting the other. If you accept anti-smoking, you should accept anti-cussing ... if you fight anti-cussing, you
should fight anti-smoking laws. It is quite clear and simple. Live an let live as long as they don't directly hurt or violate someone else's
rights and freedoms, or support the laws that create decency and order ordained by some consensus, even if us more in tune to rights and freedoms
don't agree with it.
I personally don't care about that law too much (though it is silly, but just as silly as a lot of laws like mandatory seat belts, anti-smoking
legislation, home aesthitics, etc.) ... I would prefer people around me not to use profanity, especially around children ... but it does provide the
means to show a child why they shouldn't cuss, since usually that person seems quite crazy from being enraged over a minute thing like being cut off
or bumped into, or over-reacting to something else like a stubbed toe. The bad situation can be turned into a positive educational event.
In honesty, I may not agree with the words you use, but I do feel you have the right to say them and I defend that despite my above arguments and
postulations.
Just wish you had some taste and decency
I could probably out-cuss you, but I have matured enough to all but stop using them except for a slip up
here and there.