It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by lilblam
By the way, energy is SOMETHING. When there is nothing, there IS no energy. Energy is ALL that there is, and everything is composed of energy in its different forms. You jumped to a conclusion in another thread by assuming that by NOTHING I mean just energy... as energy is something
Originally posted by Amorymeltzer
Originally posted by lilblam
By the way, energy is SOMETHING. When there is nothing, there IS no energy. Energy is ALL that there is, and everything is composed of energy in its different forms. You jumped to a conclusion in another thread by assuming that by NOTHING I mean just energy... as energy is something
id like to no what ur talkin bout, i dont recall.
what are u talking about/ i dont fallow at all. as far as i can tell, ur telling me that energy is somthing. i think i no that. did i say otherwise?
Originally posted by quiksilver
read my links please, post any more you find for us 2 read. You will learn a great deal by reading them. Energy is something, but would it be useable in the void, i mean with no forces to shape it or whatnot, would it just be there waiting for the chance to make a higgs boson or wateva then giv it its energy or sumthing.
[Edited on 22-2-2004 by quiksilver]
Originally posted by Amorymeltzer
Originally posted by lilblam
By the way, energy is SOMETHING. When there is nothing, there IS no energy. Energy is ALL that there is, and everything is composed of energy in its different forms. You jumped to a conclusion in another thread by assuming that by NOTHING I mean just energy... as energy is something
id like to no what ur talkin bout, i dont recall.
what are u talking about/ i dont fallow at all. as far as i can tell, ur telling me that energy is somthing. i think i no that. did i say otherwise?
Originally posted by quiksilver
it must have a centre, from which to evenly expand from, or else it is randomly expanding from anywhere, but even then it must be expanding a even distance from some point of another at any given moment?
[Edited on 23-2-2004 by quiksilver]
Originally posted by quiksilver
it must have a centre, from which to evenly expand from, or else it is randomly expanding from anywhere, but even then it must be expanding a even distance from some point of another at any given moment?
[Edited on 23-2-2004 by quiksilver]
What was there before the Big Bang and what is there outside of our universe?
We can define the universe as everything there is, so in that case there is nothing outside of it. We also say that space and time both started at the Big Bang and therefore there was nothing before it.
Another definition for the universe is the observable universe - which is the part of it that we can technically see. We cannot know what is outside of that (since we can't observe it), but we think that physics works the same everywhere and so we think that it should be very similar to the observable universe. We actually think that the universe might be infinite in extent, and so goes on forever, even though we can only see a finite part of it.
We can speculate in meta-physics or in religion about what was before the Big Bang, but again, we cannot use science to tell anything about it as physics as we understand it breaks down at that point.