It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
My first job was bussing tables when i was 15.
...but how can a person be content to work for minimum wage when they have to live outside the protection of their parents home?
I have to ask myself what kind of person would strive to work for minimum wage and not try to better their life by getting a higher paying job?
If there are none available in the area they live they can move...
there are so many government assisted plans to help people get an education that it is sick.
I was not eligible for a lot of government granted money because I made too much (18,000) when I applied for loans and grants.
I still think that people have the choice to live how they want to but just don't act on it.
I lucked into a job (because of all the varieties of jobs i have had) that gives me the ability to make a LOT of money .....but i had to work for it, I can see how easy it is to be complacent but i am not that type of person.
McDonlads, Burger King, Wendy's, KFC, etc etc will give a person a job regardless of their race, housing arrangement, hair color, etc.
New York is supposed to be so high in unemployment, yet do a monster.com or job.com search for New York and there are thousands of jobs available listed.
If an individual claims they cannot get a job, they simply do not want to work.
Originally posted by jackinthebox
reply to post by Stumpy1
I see where you are coming from, I really do. I went to work at 14, and was doing my best to support a house by the time I was sixteen. When my father left, I had mortgage payments and everything else to worry about. A lot of responsibility for a kid in high school, who had grown up pretty well off and suddenly was stuck exchanging canned goods as Christmas gifts.
Maybe I'm a bit biased too, from the other end. I worked my ass off for years, to end up right back here at the bottom. I swore to myself that I would never be homeless again, because it was nearly impossible to get out of that hole and because it nearly killed me. Now here I sit, in a cold car, hacking a signal on a borrowed computer without any prospects and more dejected by the day. I just hope Spring changes the playing field a little. It'll be a lot nicer weather for washing windows anyway.
I really don't care one way or the other about people on food stamps or in public housing. What I care about is people who work everyday and still can't get by.
...yet you have a car and can afford insurance in NY city?
...and you must at least live in a rental...
...or you should sell your car so you can help out those less fortunate than you...
and if you are homeless then maybe you should geta REAL job and not subsidize this post on your government assisted wage........foood stamps are reallly the death Knell.......
You aren't attacking them with the "Gov is out to get me" routine during the interviews, are you?
Maybe you aren't going to the corrrect job posting sites.
What part of New York are you in? I can look up to see how many jobs are available in your area, and maybe the ATS Board members can help you get a job.
Anythings better than unemployed and homeless, correct?
How Taxes Work
This is a VERY simple way to understand the tax laws. Read on it does make you think!!
Let's put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand. Suppose that every day, ten men go out for dinner. The bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:
The first four men the poorest would pay nothing,
the fifth would pay $1,
the sixth would pay $3,
the seventh $7,
the eighth $12,
the ninth $18,
and the tenth man the richest would pay $59.
That's what they decided to do. The ten men ate dinner in the restaurant every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement until one day, the owner threw them a curve (in tax language a tax cut).
"Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily meal by $20." So now dinner for the ten only cost $80.00.
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So the first four men were unaffected. They would still eat for free. But what about the other six the paying customers? How could they divvy up the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his "fair share?"
The six men realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would end up being PAID to eat their meal. So the restaurant owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.
And so the fifth man paid nothing,
the sixth pitched in $2,
the seventh paid $5,
the eighth paid $9,
the ninth paid $12,
leaving the tenth man with a bill of $52 instead of his earlier $59.
Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to eat for free.
But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings. "I only got a dollar out of the $20," declared the sixth man who pointed to the tenth. "But he got $7!"
"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man, "I only saved a dollar, too . . . It's unfair that he got seven times more than me!".
"That's true!" shouted the seventh man, "why should he get $7 back when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!"
"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison, "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up. The next night he didn't show up for dinner, so the nine sat down and ate without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered, a little late what was very important. They were FIFTY-TWO DOLLARS short of paying the bill! Imagine that!
And that, boys and girls, journalists and college instructors, is how the tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up at the table anymore.
Where would that leave the rest? Unfortunately, most taxing authorities anywhere cannot seem to grasp this rather straightforward logic!