It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Leaked images of Nibiru orbited by Planet X taken by South Pole Station Telescope

page: 17
68
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 29 2008 @ 11:36 AM
link   
Further traces of evidence:


Planet Projected at Solar System's Edge

Feb. 28, 2008

...

The researchers at Kobe University in western Japan said calculations using computer simulations led them to conclude it was only a matter of time before the mysterious "Planet X" was found.



dsc.discovery.com...


jra

posted on Feb, 29 2008 @ 01:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by ElectroMagnetic Multivers
you can't 'pick' Jupiter and Saturn out of the sky without knowing where they are or following directions


Older civilizations managed to find Planets without directions or even telescopes. So you can indeed pick them out, without knowing where they are, as long as you spend some time observing the sky and take note of things.

Astronomy is one of the few sciences where amateurs can still discover things. Many asteroids and comets are first spotted by amateurs. So if there is a "Planet X" heading our way, it will be spotted and the general public will know about it.



posted on Feb, 29 2008 @ 01:58 PM
link   
So now on top of worrying about Nibiru we have to worry about an entire solar system that it is dragging along with it and not only that but Nibiru is actually a mini Sun? That seems a little out there to me, but I could be missing something.

[edit on 29-2-2008 by RexxCrow]



posted on Feb, 29 2008 @ 02:23 PM
link   
I was thinking that Plante Nibiru was part of the Un-named Drawf Suns Solar System... This is just confusing isnt it...



posted on Feb, 29 2008 @ 03:43 PM
link   
Just to clarify things a little, does anybody know from where came the name "planet X" and to what it was applied?

I thought that it was just the name given to the possible planet beyond Neptune and that was expected to be the responsible for Neptune' strange orbit.

In that case, this "Planet X" has nothing to do with a planet with an even stranger orbit than Neptune that approaches Earth with a periodicity of 3600 years.

If there are two "Planet X"s then we should specify of which we are talking about. In that way we would not mix the search for a "Planet X" that explains the strange orbits of the Neptune and Pluto with the search for a "Planet X" that is supposed to approach Earth.



posted on Feb, 29 2008 @ 03:47 PM
link   
I AGREE with that guy. There is another planet in our solar system past pluto... was that not the original planet X? This other Theory is another sytem yes but lets get the names correct.



posted on Feb, 29 2008 @ 04:19 PM
link   
reply to post by ArMaP
 


ArMap, If I recall correctly, Planet X is the designation for a presumed planet out there somewhere that is being searched for. Pluto was called Planet X until Tombaugh discovered it and subsequently named.

Planet X is not the tenth planet (X does not equal Roman numeral ten), as that one has been found along with several others, Zorgon has posted a pic of them (Sedna is the only one I can think of in the group).

If this designation of Planet X has changed, forgive me as I have not looked it up recently and as I said only going from memory.

[edit on 29-2-2008 by geologist]



posted on Feb, 29 2008 @ 04:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by ArMaP
Just to clarify things a little, does anybody know from where came the name "planet X" and to what it was applied?



Indubitably


I thought EVERYONE new where Planet X came from?
So much for ATS research skills





Duck Dodgers in the 24½th Century



Duck Dodgers first appeared in the 1953 cartoon short Duck Dodgers in the 24½th Century, directed by Chuck Jones. Jones created a spoof of the popular Buck Rogers in the 25th Century and Flash Gordon science fiction serials of the 1930s, casting the brash, egomaniacal Daffy Duck as the hero of the story. The cartoon is widely praised as one of the greatest and funniest Warner Bros. cartoons of all time. As of 2003 it is available in the DVD compilation Looney Tunes Golden Collection: Volume 1.

Plot

The plot of the cartoon involves Duck Dodgers' search for the rare element Illudium Phosdex (spelled fosdex in the DVD subtitles), "the shaving cream atom". In the future, the only remaining supply of the element is on the mysterious "Planet X." After leaving Earth (after accidentally putting their rocket ship in reverse and burying them in the launch pad), Dodgers diagrams a ridiculously complex path for reaching the planet, including three-dimensional cardinal directions such as "due up" and "south by downeast." Porky Pig, playing the role of the "Eager Young Space Cadet," suggests instead following a path leading from Planet A to Planets B, C, D, and so on. Dodgers scoffs at the cadet's plan, comes up with an identical one and marvels at his own genius.

Just after Dodgers has claimed Planet X in the name of the Earth, Marvin Martian lands on the same planet (in a ship called the "Martian Maggot") and claims it in the name of Mars. The stage is set for a battle of wits (or lack thereof) between the two cartoon stars.

SOURCE: Wikipedia

Rare element Illudium Phosdex = Element 115 (has the same powers)


And aterall we KNOW those early cartoons were just disquised Military propaganda...

BTW does anyone have that famous quote about a 'third rate planet.... etc"? Been trying to find that exact wording Thanks



posted on Feb, 29 2008 @ 04:42 PM
link   
Of Course it would be unfair not to mention someone prior to that who coined "Planet X"



Percival Lowell, most well known as a proponent for canals on Mars, built a private observatory in Flagstaff, Arizona. Lowell called his hypothetical planet Planet X, and performed several searches for it, without success. Lowell's first search for Planet X came to an end in 1909, but in 1913 he started a second search, with a new prediction of Planet X: epoch 1850-01-01, mean long 11.67 deg, perih. long 186, eccentricity 0.228, mean dist 47.5 a.u. long arc node 110.99 deg, inclination 7.30 deg, mass 1/21000 solar masses. Lowell and others searched in vain for this Planet X in 1913-1915. In 1915, Lowell published his theoretical results of Planet X. It is ironic that this very same year, 1915, two faint images of Pluto was recorded at Lowell observatory, although they were never recognized as such until after the discovery of Pluto (1930).


xfacts.com...


In astronomy, Planet X is a large hypothetical planet beyond Neptune. It was postulated to explain apparent discrepancies in the orbits of the gas giants, especially those of Uranus and Neptune. Those discrepancies were mostly resolved by measurements made in the 1980s.[1]

The "X" in the name represents an unknown and is pronounced as the letter, as opposed to the Roman numeral for ten. At the time of its conception there were eight known planets in the solar system; its existence, first as a ninth planet, and then from 1930 until its demise as a tenth. Although Pluto was discovered as a result of the search for Planet X, it is not considered Planet X. Neither is Eris, even though it was at one point considered for reclassification as a planet under a proposal outlined by the International Astronomical Union (see 2006 redefinition of planet).

In popular culture, "Planet X" has become a stand-in term for an undiscovered planet in the solar system.


en.wikipedia.org...


In the 1980s and 1990s, astronomer Robert Sutton Harrington of the US Naval Observatory, who had first calculated that Pluto was too small to have perturbed the orbits of Uranus and Neptune, led a search to determine the real cause of the planets' apparently irregular orbits.[3] He calculated that any Planet X would be at roughly three times the distance from the sun of Neptune's orbit, highly elliptical, and far below the ecliptic (the planet's orbit would be at roughly a 90-degree angle from the orbit plane of the other known planets).[4] This hypothesis was met with a mixed reception. Noted Planet X skeptic Brian Marsden of Harvard University's Minor Planet Center has pointed out that these discrepancies are a hundred times smaller than those noticed by Adams and Le Verrier, and could easily be due to observational error.


en.wikipedia.org...


Harrington died in 1993, having never found Planet X but he wrote a paper...

P. K. Seidelmann and R. S. Harrington (1987). Planet X — The current status. U. S. Naval Observatory. Retrieved on 2007-11-04.

www.springerlink.com...

And then there is always the counter Earth exactly opposite Earth in our orbit... and the ancient planet that was destroyed and became the asteroid belt..

So sorry ArMaP no end to the confusion





posted on Feb, 29 2008 @ 04:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by scobro
Hi.

If there is any truth at all to this Planet X theory,then it is certainly something to worry about.

What is the "official" stance on this subject?


The official stance? Don't tell the public. Let them live their lives, meanwhile, take everyone 'important' and put them in deep underground bunkers.

I don't think anybody will believe planet x until they see it with their own eyes. At that point, it's obviously going to be too late.



posted on Feb, 29 2008 @ 04:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by rcwj75
One last thing...EVERY amature astronomer around the globe would be fixated on this cluster/planet if it really was that big and that close....


How many amature astronomers do you know with telescopes stationed in the south pole?

The flimsiest argument against Planet X is again and again "If it exists we would have seen it by now."



posted on Feb, 29 2008 @ 04:59 PM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 


Good work Zorgon, you definitely get kudos for posting such information. I kinda lean towards Duck Dodgers though.



posted on Feb, 29 2008 @ 05:40 PM
link   
reply to post by NewWorldOver
 


There is no need for the telescopes to be in the south pole to see a celestial body in the sky over the south pole, unless that celestial object is very, very close to Earth.

As you can see in this crude attempt at showing it, someone far away from the poles can see the sky above them without any problem.



And I think that from all those millions of people that live in southern hemisphere there must be some amateur astronomer.



posted on Feb, 29 2008 @ 08:55 PM
link   
www.rasnz.org.nz...

This is the planet I was talking about. Is this not the planet they were searching for?



posted on Mar, 1 2008 @ 12:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by rjmelter
www.rasnz.org.nz...

This is the planet I was talking about. Is this not the planet they were searching for?


Just a quick glance....this is a great link to evidence of objects that ARE NOT ABOUT to be on an orbit to invite such horrible devastation as predicted.....

Where is this nonsense generated? Really, we have, A) a 'Destroyer' planet on a '3600 year' (assuming that refers to the Solar Year...the Earth 'year'... B) it is a Brown Dwarf, and the 'planet X' is in orbit, and they 'visit' us every 3600 years...or, C), it is a 'rogue' gas giant that orbits every 3600 years, or every (fill in the blank) number of years, but you betcha!!! iT'S COMING THIS TIME!!!!

This is the same nonsense that convinced people the Earth was Flat. Or that a giant boat could re-populate the entire Earth, all of the continents, after some imagined flood.

Logical thinking caps back on, please....ok, class resume.

[spelling]

[edit on 1-3-2008 by weedwhacker]



posted on Mar, 1 2008 @ 08:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by NewWorldOver
 


There is no need for the telescopes to be in the south pole to see a celestial body in the sky over the south pole, unless that celestial object is very, very close to Earth.

As you can see in this crude attempt at showing it, someone far away from the poles can see the sky above them without any problem.



And I think that from all those millions of people that live in southern hemisphere there must be some amateur astronomer.


could be the fact that you have to look through less atmosphere at the poles



posted on Mar, 1 2008 @ 09:22 AM
link   
reply to post by open2urideas
 


The atmosphere makes a difference, that is why they put that telescope (which is a microwave telescope, not a common telescope) there, but it's not enough to block things from view.

And that is why observatories are usually in high places.



posted on Mar, 2 2008 @ 01:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by NewWorldOver
I don't think anybody will believe planet x until they see it with their own eyes. At that point, it's obviously going to be too late.


Not if you have an FLT saucer in your garage... (or know where the Elevator is to the secret transport tube to the underground base)




posted on Mar, 2 2008 @ 09:49 AM
link   
Some info regarding Planet X on Project Camelot.


Project Camelot has just returned from Italy and Norway. In Italy we met with Luca Scantamburlo, who has extensively documented Cristoforo Barbato's contacts with a Jesuit insider in the Vatican (we had been unable to meet with Barbato himself). The topic of our interview was the 'Jesuit Footage' of Planet X, a leaked two minute film clip of a large unknown planet taken from a classified space probe named Siloe.


www.projectcamelot.net...



posted on Mar, 2 2008 @ 10:07 AM
link   
Honestly I can't decide which side to believe. Either the fact that we know the solarsystem like we know the back of our hands. Or that we are finding surprises everyday that are as massive as a planet. Its also hard to believe a Nibiru or 'Planet X' when we can't decide what it is where supposed to be afraid of. Either it's a rogue planet or a failed star.

All in all I will neither try and debunk nor jump on the band wagon on this just yet and keep an open mind about the possiblity of another planet or star. The only thing that makes me thing such a thing Might not exist is teh data we should have obtained from voyager 1 and 2. Shouldn't those two have sent back some means of data, images, statics or what not about a rogue planet or star? Seeing as they are the two farthest man-made objects to ever move beyond the solar system? Surely some form of gravity should have kicked those two into an orbit around something. Or at least picked up something.

Perhaps NASA is hiding something, or perhaps I am thinking to much into it.



new topics

top topics



 
68
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join