It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

2nd figure on mars found?

page: 14
16
<< 11  12  13    15 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 16 2008 @ 05:19 PM
link   
reply to post by Neiby
 


I hear ya.

But its sure much better than going through all those 9/11 threads


One of these days somebody is gonna post a mind blowing pic that NASA missed.

And maybe not.



posted on Mar, 16 2008 @ 11:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by vze2xjjk
reply to post by spikedmilk
 
This will at least show that you did get a LIVE being and about 10 more in same frame.That is a snake person with small head slightly larger than PING PONG ball sized.To your right hand side is a face closer to our size.Other more animal faces are all round.
Oh that's a good one snakelike the one that looks like a monkey in positive image,but no arms in reality.These are one of the most common Mars animals,and what's freaky is some have very human heads,some animal heads.



Is that you, Wiolawa?? It's got to be you! I've been wondering what you've been up to lately.



posted on Mar, 16 2008 @ 11:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by RUFFREADY
reply to post by Neiby
 


I hear ya.

But its sure much better than going through all those 9/11 threads


One of these days somebody is gonna post a mind blowing pic that NASA missed.

And maybe not.


The problem is that the large majority of the people I see posting here have no clue what they're even talking about. They're simply not qualified to do image analysis, yet they have no problem claiming to see trees, animals, people....or snakes, for the paranoid schizophrenics in our midst.

It's all just really annoying. I wish people would think a bit more before posting. Do a little research. Use common sense! And learn a little about photo analysis. It would really save the rest of us a lot of time and frustration.

Back to the topic at hand, it should never have even been posted in the first place. Any reasonable person with even the tiniest amount of experience analyzing this sort of imagery knew exactly what it was. But, no, someone has to come on here and say, "Hey, look at this!" and then this whole silly thread gets started. It's just a time waster. I've been looking for a place where serious people discuss this sort of stuff, but I'm really beginning to suspect that this just isn't the place.

Maybe I just need to be more patient and learn who the serious posters are and ignore the rest.

My apologies for the rant, but I'm tired, I've got a sinus infection, and my patience is running pretty low today.



posted on Mar, 16 2008 @ 11:50 PM
link   
reply to post by iammonkey
 


That's obviously a crevice my friend.
I'm a professional artist and can read a photo.
Look at the light and shadows on the rocks-if it were a figure it
would have light on one side shadow on the other-just like the rocks.
It wouldn't be a figure that is all dark and shadows.

You are like someone staring at clouds trying to see shapes.



posted on Mar, 17 2008 @ 12:25 AM
link   
To vze2xjjk:

If you're not Wiolawa, I found out where she hangs out now. You might really enjoy this forum:

z6.invisionfree.com...

For the rest of you who don't think there are snakes on Mars, I wouldn't recommend spending much time at that forum. It will make your head explode.

[edit on 17-3-2008 by Neiby]



posted on Mar, 17 2008 @ 10:09 AM
link   
reply to post by internos
 


Internos,thanks for the video,and I can see many of the anomalies as somewhat explainable,but best one for me is that buried perfect square foundation.That's a beauty ! The joking to explain an image was justified for the Bill Clinton reference because I could have said Mister Potato head and gotten the similar idea across,yet topical as Bill is he just fit better.These are creatures that resemble a football sized head on two skinny legs that are stick-like,and you can get away with weak legs on Mars with 1/3 gravity.It's a species of basically a head on 2 legs,as weird as that looks and sounds.



posted on Mar, 17 2008 @ 11:01 AM
link   
vze2xjjk,

Do you know who Wiolawa is? I'm dying to know.



posted on Mar, 17 2008 @ 11:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by Neiby
.The problem is that the large majority of the people I see posting here have no clue what they're even talking about. They're simply not qualified to do image analysis,

which I don’t have that’s why it was posted

it should never have even been posted in the first place.
well it was.


Any reasonable person with even the tiniest amount of experience analyzing this sort of imagery knew exactly what it was. again which I don’t have that’s why it was posted.



But, no, someone has to come on here and say, "Hey, look at this!" and then this whole silly thread gets started. It's just a time waster. I've been looking for a place where serious people discuss this sort of stuff, but I'm really beginning to suspect that this just isn't the place.

Their are some people who enjoy looking at things like this well now you know to avoid clicking on to my post it was titled 2nd figure on mars? see that(?) its a question mark meaning I’m looking for answers and opinions I stated what I can see. It doesn’t mean it is a figure. It is however the shape of one. Their are plenty of serious thread on ats which I enjoy but every now and then its good to get away from them and post something that can be light hearted. but now you know to say away from iammonkey
get well soon



posted on Mar, 17 2008 @ 12:03 PM
link   
You're right, I came down a bit too hard on you, so I apologize. Like I said, I was very grumpy the other day. :-)

I suppose that we all have very different levels of experience with this sort of thing and have varying degrees of skill with regard to image analysis. I'm certainly no expert. I have a bit of experience with it, but nothing like the true pros.



posted on Mar, 17 2008 @ 04:46 PM
link   
Apology accepted thank you
All the best to you.



posted on Mar, 17 2008 @ 07:55 PM
link   
Now we just need to find out if vze2xjjk is actually Wiolawa. :-)



posted on Apr, 15 2008 @ 12:45 AM
link   
I looked at it
IT'S A ROCK
let me say it again more clearly
IT'S A ROCK
thank you for your time

nice panorama though



posted on Apr, 15 2008 @ 02:13 AM
link   
Wow I dont get what people are seeing here... All I can CLEARLY see is the front face of a rock... and the sand being pushed up to suggest movement? no thats not sand thats clearly some jagged rocks sticking out of the ground. I did think the pyramid picture looked pretty cool but I just wish everyone would give up with the life on mars thing. It's just not happening people



posted on Apr, 23 2008 @ 05:56 PM
link   


Increased the contrast and the brightness,doesnt the left hand side of the pic look something like a face?



posted on Apr, 23 2008 @ 07:20 PM
link   


It's a rock covered with sand.

No lizard people. No ethereal bodies. No ancient statue.

The scientific evaluation should not be second to creativity if you're serious about these matters.



posted on May, 3 2008 @ 11:19 PM
link   
reply to post by RUFFREADY
 


Ruff,I believe on amomalies pages there is what looks like a flying man bent over,as if using "body English " to help propel forward,leaning into the wind or flight path.



posted on May, 3 2008 @ 11:22 PM
link   
reply to post by Neiby
 


Whatever happenned to Wiolawa? I miss her. Please get me in touch with her.I use 1 of her images.



posted on May, 3 2008 @ 11:26 PM
link   
reply to post by shiftmasters
 


You guys are zeroed in on one fraction of a large body that has legs sticking up at 90 degrees bent at a joint,so nasa disguised it with masking.The belly up animal is over 10 feet long,easily and resembles a giant centipede. Not all the legs are that big and long however,so it's quite a mystery.



posted on May, 3 2008 @ 11:33 PM
link   
reply to post by Neiby
 


Nelby it takes going out on a limb to interpret the pics and allow ourselves to be wrong initially with some interpretations.I designed the original spark of life for the Mars rovers 1987,and am invested in finding life on Mars despite interference from nasa who actually found life 1976 at the very latest on Mars. Here's the proof that most are to blind to see from 32 years ago.Nobody else dared tell or show you it,because it's easier and safer NOT TO. Question Authority or SUBMIT. Comply,and believe what you are shovelled.Enjoy the aroma.



posted on May, 15 2008 @ 01:26 AM
link   
WOW!! this is amazing..............oh wait..............no............. well done I haven't seen such a pretty rock in ages.



new topics




 
16
<< 11  12  13    15 >>

log in

join