It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Where is the best place to go when Nibiru returns?

page: 5
3
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 19 2008 @ 09:52 AM
link   
For D.U.M.B. GOOGLE 'PHIL SCHNEIDER' and watch the vid 'the one he supposedly died for' anyway all things are not simply black and white there is some gray in there too.

The earths rotation would not simply stop we are looking at possible magnetic pole change or physical pole changes (has happened in the past) and possible mega sunspot activity. However all this has happened before and the earth is still here, maybe the occupants might not be in the future but thats another story.



posted on Feb, 19 2008 @ 06:12 PM
link   
news.bbc.uk...reply to post by jfj123
 
Hi, i am getting the info together you asked for, but in the mean time check out this BBC story about NASA's lattest anouncement regarding planets, be sure to read the bottom half of the story that say's there could be hundreds of planets yet to be discovered in OUR solar system. Remember the point i was making was not that the information proved planet x existed, and im not saying it does, my point is, there is to much information to rule it out all together. If NASA is saying they are discovering large objects in the ort cloud all the time, and there could be earth size planets in our solar system yet to be discovered, then this is just one more bit of info to make you think, I wonder what IS out there.




posted on Feb, 19 2008 @ 06:32 PM
link   
Just two more point's, It is silly to say did this or that happen every 3600 years, obviously the affects would be different every time it flys past depending on the position of the planets. The worst time would be if the EARTH got between the SUN and PLANET X on one of the fly bye's, this probably doesnt happen every time. If the Earth is on the opposite side of the Sun to planet X when it flys past the affects would be less of an impact. Also people should study the electric universe theory ( and before you knock this down, remember most science is based on the best theory of the day ) they are saying that most craters are not impact craters but electric arc craters, now we dont see them everyday, so that tells me that something creates alot of electrical activity in our solar system now and again, some food for thought.



posted on Feb, 19 2008 @ 06:39 PM
link   
The best place to hide.....hmmm....I dont know.

Ask Zacariah Stitchin, he was the one that made the whole hoax up

Maybe under your aluminium foil hat


sty

posted on Feb, 19 2008 @ 06:58 PM
link   
reply to post by SaviorComplex
 


well, still the best place on Earth!
as long as you are in the middle of the watter - you just go with the flow. If you managed to see a computer rendering of the Indonesia tsunami you will see that the big waves were actually created at the margin of the ocean while the deep ocean was fairly stable.
If the rotation of the Earth would stop , we would not see the deep waters of the ocean moving around. My guess is that this place would be the safest on Earth - however after the event would be over it would be next to impossible to live on the surface as we have more than 3000 worldwide atomic plants that would turn into 3000 Cernobil s ...( I am not an expert in Atomic safety - just curious - is there any technology to safely turn off an atomic plant in the case of a major disaster like the supposed Nibiru? )



posted on Feb, 20 2008 @ 05:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by west aussie
Just two more point's, It is silly to say did this or that happen every 3600 years, obviously the affects would be different every time it flys past depending on the position of the planets. The worst time would be if the EARTH got between the SUN and PLANET X on one of the fly bye's, this probably doesnt happen every time. If the Earth is on the opposite side of the Sun to planet X when it flys past the affects would be less of an impact. Also people should study the electric universe theory ( and before you knock this down, remember most science is based on the best theory of the day ) they are saying that most craters are not impact craters but electric arc craters, now we dont see them everyday, so that tells me that something creates alot of electrical activity in our solar system now and again, some food for thought.


Keep in mind that if it comes every 3600 years, it's in a stable orbit. All of the inner planets are also in a stable orbit. That being said, it would pass by the same way each time and the affects would be similar each time.

If it's not in a stable orbit and changes position, then the orbit won't be 3600 years each time.



posted on Feb, 21 2008 @ 09:39 PM
link   
reply to post by mattguy404
 


I see, so I should completely ignore your statement that: 'My point is, if there were a Planet X that passed us by every few thousand years, there would be NO evolutionary development on Earth at all because anything that arose would be wiped out. That's the fundamental, definite and ultimate nail in the coffin for this stupid nonsense of Planet X.' Very well then.

As for your assertion that any theory of creation depends on the idea that the earth is only 6000 years old, you’re simply incorrect. Yes there are those that claim such, and there are also those who claim that Piltdown man is legitimate. The book of Genesis in no way requires a 6000 year old earth, in fact it describes a ‘re-creation’, which implies an older earth than the ‘begets’ add up to. Nice try though. And yes, I believe a get a sense of your belief system.

As to the submarine vessel idea…… It makes a lot of sense on a certain level, but if the seas are getting pulled around, and up and over the earth, I don’t like your chances. Getting bounced along the bottom of the sea, or pounded against mountains doesn’t sound like much fun.



posted on Feb, 21 2008 @ 09:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by jfj123

Keep in mind that if it comes every 3600 years, it's in a stable orbit. All of the inner planets are also in a stable orbit. That being said, it would pass by the same way each time and the affects would be similar each time.

If it's not in a stable orbit and changes position, then the orbit won't be 3600 years each time.


I heard long range elliptical orbits were highly unstable, which adds another reason why this is just a hoax



posted on Mar, 17 2008 @ 06:48 PM
link   
reply to post by OzWeatherman
 


The Viking landers found Life on Mars,but we civilians were kept in the dark about this fact.There are people on Mars who look like us and wear clothes.Nasa is avoiding a space race to avoid losing potential advanced techno.That's why they are stalling.There are many highly evolved species of animals on Mars,and tons,no megatons of fossils scattered all over the ground. Why LIE ,Nasa?



posted on Mar, 17 2008 @ 06:54 PM
link   
If a new rogue planet, whatever you wanted to call it, appeared in the solar system, the best place to go would be in front of your computer, logged on to a good astronomy site. They would have all the best information about it.

Other than that, if you are really jazzed about seeing a cool planet zooming through the system, just go out any clear night and look at the planets already up there. Some of them are pretty interesting, even though as big as they are, they only really look like sparkly stars.

It's not like Zyra or Bellus.



posted on Jun, 7 2008 @ 09:04 AM
link   
where on this earth is safe during and after nibiru ??? well you need to go back to where we began, Zecharia Sitchin says the sumerians where the first so called humans on earth and thay are from what is now know as IRAQ ................ gives new reason to invade!!!



posted on Jun, 7 2008 @ 10:45 AM
link   
Assuming for the moment that Planet X actually exists...and that it's headed this way with evil intent?

Let's see...the coast? Nope, tsunamis, tidal surges, etc... Bad idea.

Inland? Earthquakes, volcanos, etc... Bad idea.

Have your trackshoes on, and stay mobile. No one place is going to be safer than another, one day one area, tommorrow another. Be mobile...



posted on Jun, 7 2008 @ 11:07 AM
link   
well... Indiana Jones survived a nuclear explosion inside of a refrigerator so i am starting to think that might be a good place to be since there is food and cold beer close by.



posted on Jun, 22 2008 @ 11:20 PM
link   



posted on Jun, 23 2008 @ 04:22 AM
link   
Don't bother making plans for the return of Nibiru, guys. It's a myth. It doesn't exist.



posted on Jun, 23 2008 @ 06:45 AM
link   
Another planetary system? I don't think you'd be safe anywhere on earth if a planet passed in between mars and earth,

[edit on 23-6-2008 by TomProctor]



posted on Jun, 23 2008 @ 08:19 AM
link   
If something were to happen and society as we know it collapsed, I would head into the bush of Northern Ontario. I have some experience living up there, having camped sometimes for months at a time back in my youth. Plenty of fresh water and fish means I could survive for a time at least.



posted on Jun, 23 2008 @ 08:25 AM
link   
Where is the best place to go when Nibiru returns?


I'd say Nibiru would be the best place to go.
Isn't that the point?
It's coming to save us and we shall return to the stars, so i'd say the best place would be Nibiru itself.



posted on Jun, 26 2008 @ 05:19 PM
link   
reply to post by SaviorComplex
 


Are you talking about what would happen if it stopped spinning on its axis or its orbit of the sun? If its the axis spinning that stops then you would have tidal waves going from West to East.
I belive Earth is rotating at 900mph (according to Monty Python) so not really a massive speed as you said.

This kind of Nibiru stuff really interests me.

The meek will inherit the Eart and all that.


As an answer to your question of where the best place to be is..... i would say the middle of Australia! Massive land mass far away from tidal waves.



posted on Aug, 25 2008 @ 01:09 PM
link   
reply to post by h3akalee
 


you aren't very well read in this subject are you? i'm sure you'd like to have someone give you in two sentences verifying proof of this whole subject... how naive of you. if you're going to criticize, say some more other than " i have no idea about anyof this subject, but since it sounds crazy i'm going to label it bull #"

until you research and join the quest for knowledge yourself, you are just a by stander

also, the poster of this thread was not angry mad or anything at you in his response to your response, he was simply giving YOU the constructive criticism in return for YOUR constructive criticism.. if YOU can't handle criticism then don't say anything



new topics

top topics



 
3
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join