It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Insolubrious
Personally I am far more inclined to believe the impact zones on the towers were sabotaged either weeks, months or years in advance of the event. It makes far more sense than holoplanes! Even if the tech was available it's still easier, cheaper and a more reliable method and if your going to rig the towers with explosives I am sure sabotaging the impact zones wouldn't be too much trouble.
Originally posted by u2r2h
Why? because THERE WERE films, photos and eyewitnesses and they were NOT ALL FAKED
Originally posted by u2r2h
If you are a noplaners, you MUST be a hologrammer
If you do not agree, come forward, it shall be possible to make you understand.
Originally posted by plasmacutter
reply to post by philjwolf
take a 16 pound sledge hammer and swing as hard as u can on a flimsy 1/2 inch thick steel beam. Then take the same sledge hammer go to a junk yard and hit an alluminium plane body part and see what happens.
now take the same sledge hammer and swing it at 4 inch thick steel beam and see what happens . Then do it agin and see the out come. hell swing it at a steel bodied car for that matter . the steel beam will win ever time ill bet a billion dollars the alluminum parts will loose every time .
And thats just from the power of ur swing ull barley have to swing it to destroy the plane parts . hell it takes 4 drops of a 13000 pound beam to chopp up a plane . and all they do is drop it img187.imageshack.us...
and the wtc beams where 60,000 pounds and not to mention the 6 inch concrete with 1 inch rebar in it and the 1 inch alluminum facade.
building wins every time ill put my money on the 500,000 ton building anyday over a 100 ton plane .
[edit on 14-8-2008 by plasmacutter]
Originally posted by plasmacutter
reply to post by jprophet420
of course it should have cruppled like a tin can or shatterd . and the heavier alluminium parts and landing gear ect ect wouldnt crumple or shatter but would have bounced off or saild threw the building windows but none of it would have cutt 4 inch steel. and thats not a matter of opion its a matter of physics fact. even a lead bullet traveling at 3500 feet per second wouldnt cut threw 4 inch steel like butter like the planes suposedly did ,not one part fell to the ground . if i could swing the building itself at a plane like swinging a bat at a baseball what would happen to the plane? probably a home run.
[edit on 14-8-2008 by plasmacutter]
One of the engines and part of the landing gear hurtled across the 79th floor, through wall partitions and two fire walls, and out the south wall's windows to fall onto a twelve-story building across 33rd Street.
Originally posted by plasmacutter
reply to post by Niobis
did u see the videos? the wings and body sliced threw the building like butter, like the building wasnt even there.
Originally posted by plasmacutter
but for arguments sake lets say the engines did make it threw. the only holes would have been from the engines or landing gear right?? so how did the hole become bigger then the plane its self?