Are the 19 arab "hijackers" families entitled to compensation?

Sorry, but the 19 named are in part ruses. Conservatively, at least seven of them are very much alive.

This is common knowledge outside of the USA. It is stunning how controlled the US American public has become by the government sanctioned information brokers.

reply to post by Pellevoisin


Thanks for bringing that up Pelle, well put.

I agree with you about the possibility that some or all of the 19 were only "strawmen" existing only in a papertrail, perhaps based upon an unwitting dupe, or in other cases not. The "evidence" we are supposed to believe is of a very suspicious nature and of dubious origin.

The fact that the Citizens of the United States of America are supposed to accept this pathetic flimsy excuse of an "explanation" put forward by those responsible for protecting our Constitution and Liberty for a crime of this magnitude and unprecedented nature is an outrage!

However, the U.S. Government says that these 19 were indeed killed on September 11, 2001 as the result of aircraft crashes. Are they entitled to the same compensation as all others that we are told died that day under the same circumstances?

reply to post by Pellevoisin


Well if 7 of them are supposedly alive, then I expect them to come out and demand compensation and apology from the U.S. govt. for using their names in the conspiracy.

reply to post by deltaboy


Hi Delta...

I think its sad that the truthers are STILL using a 6 year old article from the BBC .... an article that the BBC later corrected.

Well Capt O, we can post this again, I guess.....

www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...

The BBC and CNN screwed up. Even the hijackers families agree that it was their loved ones that hijacked the flights. So, you can read the links and learn or choose to remain uninformed.

Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
Even the hijackers families agree that it was their loved ones that hijacked the flights.

Have any of these families tried any legal recourse for their loved ones death?

reply to post by ItsHumanNature


Why would they? Half of the families CELEBRATE the hijackers for what they did. Besides, those families werent eligible for the money.

Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by ItsHumanNature

 

those families werent eligible for the money.

Why were these families not eligible?

The dark, sinister fascist powers already paid them in advance.

The money trail is clear for those who search.

Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by ItsHumanNature

 

Why would they? Half of the families CELEBRATE the hijackers for what they did. Besides, those families werent eligible for the money.

Which half celebrate? What are the other half doing?

Originally posted by CaptainObvious
reply to post by ItsHumanNature

 

It's been six years... and the goons at Ground Zero have STILL not offerend any evidence to their cause.


And in response to your thread... the highjackers families can not get any money...The federal Sept. 11 Victims Compensation Fund, went out of business in 2003.

Interesting "reply" to the post of mine. CapOb "responds" to things not mentioned in the referenced comment of mine and instead misdirects by tossing a stick for everybody to chase.

I still have not recieved a single reply to this posting of mine, which surprises me, and I am curious if people are just in denial or too scared to face these frightening possibilities. Please read the posting he referenced here and let me know what you think.

Which part bothers you the most? That no one really takes you seriously with the compensation issue or that Capt O. pointed out that as of yet, NO ONE has offered ANY reliable evidence to refute that the 19 terrorists were responsible for 9/11??

Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
Capt O. pointed out that as of yet, NO ONE has offered ANY reliable evidence to refute that the 19 terrorists were responsible for 9/11??

I agree. It also equally true that NO ONE has offered ANY reiliable evicence to prove that the 19 men in question were indeed responsible for the murders of Black Tuesday. That is why I started this thread.

We the Citizens of the United States of America should not stand for the feeble explanations for a crime of this magnitude and unprecedented nature.

Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
Which part bothers you the most? That no one really takes you seriously with the compensation issue or that Capt O. pointed out that as of yet, NO ONE has offered ANY reliable evidence to refute that the 19 terrorists were responsible for 9/11??

Thanks for the post swamp.I appreciate your concern on whether I am "bothered" . I am not. Apparently you are a no one, you have several posts on here. No reliable evidence has been put forward proving that they were indeed responsible for the deaths involving the 4 airliners in question either. There is no reliable evidence proving that any of the other passengers on those planes were involved in the hijackings either. Why are they automatically entitled to compensation? How do we know if others were involved? Where is the proof?

Watch this video in its entirity, and TRY to actually comprehend what is being presented.

vids.myspace.com...

If you cannot see the connection between the Terrorists and being in the US. AND on these flights then your mind is firmly shut.

Originally posted by ItsHumanNature

This type of "evidence" is exactly the same as was presented as definitive proof that 19 arabs perpetrated the crimes on September 11, 2001. It was only good enough to convict them in the "court of public opinion" and those who framed those patsies realize that is the only thing that matters, not a real trial.
Genius. Pure Evil Genius.

Does this "evidence" make you guilty? How can anybody prove it wrong? The issue of guilt by death is the central reason I created this discussion. And those of you think that this is just something that "happens to the other guy" are wrong. If it can be done to 19 dupes, it can be done to you or those you care about.

Big wakeup call folks. Interesting times lay ahead: Question Everything.

You would like a response to this? I trimmed the quote since I already responded to the goons. YES goons that rant at Ground Zero. Better known as the "Ground Zero's."

Please tell me what "proof" you have offered to defend the 911 conspiracy theories.

Then tell me what proof you would like to prove those 19 scum bags are guilty of killing our citizens.

Your other post is VERY interesting:

We the Citizens of the United States of America should not stand for the feeble explanations for a crime of this magnitude and unprecedented nature.

This is typical for at Conspiracy Theorist. Please understand that I am not trying to be rude. Ct'ers need there to be an explination to match the crime......

Kennedy asassination....could NOT have been done by just some loony physco.

Oklahoma Building was not only done by two government haters.

And it goes on.

I would LOVE to know what he thinks reliable evidence is..He could try studying the Zachy Moukie trial if he wants. Although somehow I think he wont accept any of that evidence. And of course, he wont accept the flight attendant calls, nor the gate agents testimonies, nor any of the rest of the evidence.

reply to post by Swampfox46_1999


I think the ZM trial is a good example, thanks for bringing that up swamp. The "brooklyn bridge" video presented by the FBI as evidence is of particular signifigance. It clearly shows an "airplane" flying straight and level for the entire approach to WTC tower2. This video is claimed to have been seized immediately after the attacks and was in FBI custody since.

This directly contradicts the LIVE video specifically the CBS footage that clearly shows the "airplane" diving several thousand feet during this same time period. Which one is fake? Both of them? This is likely since both of these videos directly contradict what is shown on the other 4 LIVE videos aired on 9/11/2001 by the MEDIA. If the BB footage is fake, then the FBI introduced fake evidence, and is guilty of perjury at the very least. If it is real it is conclusive proof that what we were shown on LIVE TV was fake. FAKE. They cannot both be real- face it.

reply to post by ItsHumanNature


Yeah, the FBI needed to present "fake" footage. Come on now. This is silly. Stop with the hologram fantasy.... please present some evidence that backs up your CT's.

reply to post by CaptainObvious


The fact remains that the 5 live videops nad the ZM trial brooklyn bridge footage do not match, it isnt even close.This is a typical "answer" from you CO, but then its what I expect. You can jump up and down and spout your nonsense all you want , but the fact that one or ALL of these videos is FAKE will remain.