It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by grover
reply to post by BlueRaja
Really?
The best way to deal with terrorism is to encourage socio-economic growth in the regions it is most prominant so that people don't have to feel that is their only option to having their voices heard, that and stop trying to shove our ideals down their throats... generally speaking as the middle class grows, so does the push for political reform... democracies thrive where there is a strong and vibrant middle class and they become endangered when the middle class shrinks.
A lesson we should all pay close attention to.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Originally posted by BlueRaja
But the most effective way to deal with terrorism, is to be vigilant and proactive in preventing the attack in the first place.
Well maybe in your book. But then how would you answer to allegations that there wouldn't be any terrorism threat against the US to begin with, IF WE'D JUST GET OUT OF THEIR LAND?
Of course if you can find cells, supporters, financers, suppliers, etc.. and break them up before they can act, that's far more desirable, than just having a good casualty response plan.
Well that may be true, but the whole point of this article is to illustrate that a good casualty response plan is of not much use when you don't have the trained people in place to do it- and those that potentially could be are off lining the pockets of the military industrial complex.
Go Vermont, get the Guard back home.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
reply to post by BlueRaja
Yeah but using that ideology, we'd just nuke mecca and be done with it.
Whatever happened to live and let live? I could see it if once we were out of there, and consolidated back home, and then they tried something. But as long as we occupy their land, we will be at war, plain and simple.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
reply to post by kerontehe
Oh? How so? In fact, I'd say to the contrary. Noble Resolve is planning to do all this incredible planning with a minimum of actual troops. Mostly through computers. Now why would that be if they had the option to work out all this with actual trained personnel at every critical point in the operation? Maybe because they are running a little short?
This thread makes it's point regardless of the other thread. And vice versa. You are trying to create a tie here that has very little merit. And especially if you see both threads from a conspiratorial angle. So no, I don't buy what you are saying, sorry.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
reply to post by BlueRaja
Yeah, that's true, but those same type of simulations may well have been used as a cover in a number of ways for 911 to occur. And we don't need to get into that here. You know the drill.
On that basis, as well as historical precedent, I feel I have every right to keep asking questions and pre plot the plot planners best I can. I find it very interesting how you and several others immediately jumped up all concerned when I showed them the real deal. Yeah, you should be. I am too. And hoping like hell I am dead wrong. Let the evidence speak for itself.