It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(As a side note here many witnesses who claim to have seen large airliners also claim to have been lucky enough to have seen BOTH "impacts". In the concrete canyons of Manhattan this in itself is very unlikely. I may start a discussion about suggestion, meme implantation, the human desire to be a witness to an historical event and one upsmanship in a crowd soon because this was a central part of the Con)
Originally posted by ItsHumanNature
reply to post by thedman
Who are you? What building were you you in? If you saw anything from New Jersey, how can you be certain it was what we are told to believe? Who are these "50" people in your building? What exactly did "they"see? Can you tell the difference between a small aircraft 2 miles away and a large one 8 miles away?
Originally posted by ItsHumanNature
These are basic logic questions.
Originally posted by Essedarius
Originally posted by ItsHumanNature
These are basic logic questions.
No. They are basic filibuster techniques.
Boiled down, it goes something like this:
(tex text edidted complete text above)
"No-Plane Logic" simply means a tsunami of idiotic questions and youtube references that are presented only to drown out the voices of first-hand witnesses.
There is no logic to it.
Originally posted by ItsHumanNature
... a great example of which would be your post above- intentionally made as long as possible with no resolution. The purpose of which is obfuscation of the central issues and distraction from any real discussion by wasting time reading nonsense.
There is no such thing as an "idiotic question". Only idiots who refuse to ask questions.