It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WitnessFromAfar
Gambon, from my research into the case I don't think there was any manipulation with this photo. Early on in this thread, Gazrok directed me to another researcher (and fellow ATS Member) Frank Warren. While I have not met with Frank in person, I was able to verify through several sources (including Frank ) that he is in possession of the original LA Times Photo.
In Franks own words,
"It's sitting on my desk right now."
I'll U2U Frank, to see if he's willing to post in this thread regarding the picture. From what Frank told me during my initial investigation, was that the PEHI image was the highest resolution scan of the image available online.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Hi Frank,
Thanks for asking what questions we have.
Here's what I read:
Originally posted by WitnessFromAfar
Gambon, from my research into the case I don't think there was any manipulation with this photo. Early on in this thread, Gazrok directed me to another researcher (and fellow ATS Member) Frank Warren. While I have not met with Frank in person, I was able to verify through several sources (including Frank ) that he is in possession of the original LA Times Photo.
In Franks own words,
"It's sitting on my desk right now."
I'll U2U Frank, to see if he's willing to post in this thread regarding the picture. From what Frank told me during my initial investigation, was that the PEHI image was the highest resolution scan of the image available online.
I'm not sure exactly what Witnessfromafar wanted other than what he said there, but along the same lines I was also wondering where I would go to find the highest quality photo of the "battle of LA" to analyze (with all the spotlights converged), or more realistically a high quality scan of the photo.
And is the highest quality original source available to us from the newspaper? Or from the photographer's negative? Or something else?
Thanks again
Originally posted by Frank Warren
Mornin' Arbitrageur,
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Hi Frank,
..I was also wondering where I would go to find the highest quality photo of the "battle of LA" to analyze (with all the spotlights converged), or more realistically a high quality scan of the photo.
And is the highest quality original source available to us from the newspaper? Or from the photographer's negative? Or something else?
Thanks again
I'll upload the image in the next few days in our "BOLA section" at The UFO chronicles; in the mean time, the very first place I released the image was at Jeff Rense's site (years ago); additionally, I sent a jpg to Bruce (Maccabee); henceforth, those two sites would have copies that aren't 100th generation clones . . . which by the way I have noticed some "degradation" in copies, even here in this thread.
Cheers,
Frank
Originally posted by gambon
thats just a cover of a report??or am i missing something..
Originally posted by gambon
and the letters could have been written to fit the locations of people units etc at the time by people looking it up on the net ?to lend credence to whatever slant they wish to put on this story.
Originally posted by gambon
And does the paper that published the photo still have the negative or not?