reply to post by Brad.T
HI Brad.T,
This is what I found on that site to possibly explain why the Jan. 29th calculation is not there....
2007 TU24
General assumptions: D = 0.30 km, P = 4.0 h, OC albedo = 0.10, subradar lat = 0.0 deg
ARECIBO: G = 10.00 K/Jy, Tsys = 25.0 K, P = 900 kW, elev >= 70.3 deg, unhopped
Monostatic
UTC Dist. # SNR/ SNR/
start date window RA Dec (AU) runs day run
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2008 Jan 27 20:25-21:21 12 0 0.009 95 411000 44000
2008 Jan 28 20:07-22:31 22 30 0.004 315 11x10^6 649000
...too far north for Arecibo to track on Jan. 29-31......
2008 Feb 01 07:00-08:22 179 36 0.016 98 51000 5600
2008 Feb 02 06:43-08:42 180 33 0.021 118 25000 2600
2008 Feb 03 06:34-08:48 181 31 0.027 113 12000 1200
2008 Feb 04 06:28-08:50 182 30 0.032 104 6100 640
2008 Feb 05 06:23-08:49 182 29 0.037 95 3400 370
2008 Feb 06 06:19-08:48 182 28 0.042 87 2100 230
2008 Feb 07 06:14-08:45 182 28 0.048 80 1300 150
2008 Feb 08 06:10-08:43 182 27 0.053 74 880 110
2008 Feb 09 06:05-08:39 182 27 0.058 69 600 77
2008 Feb 10 06:01-08:36 182 26 0.064 64 430 56
2008 Feb 11 05:56-08:32 182 26 0.069 60 310 42
2008 Feb 12 05:52-08:29 182 26 0.074 56 230 33
2008 Feb 13 05:47-08:25 182 26 0.080 53 180 26
GOLDSTONE: G = 0.94 K/Jy, Tsys = 18.0 K, P = 440 kW, elev >= 20.0 deg, unhopped
(DSS-14 is unavailable for the best dates.)
Notice that is says "...too far north for Arecibo to track on Jan. 29-31..."
What the heck does that mean? I am going to be honest, I am worried now...This thing is going to get too close for comfort...
[edit on 22-1-2008 by wrangell76]
[edit on 22-1-2008 by wrangell76]