it was my understanding that the stealth on the JSF was roughly the same as the F-117 -
i will try to find where i saw that ==== American Mad Man
Do not waste your time. They are not the same, not even close. You will see references
to first generation, second generation stealth etc. Its a misnomer. There are different
approaches to stealth just as there are different colors of light. There are many references in
the public domain that can give you an idea of the concept. Example:
people.howstuffworks.com...
This has been so for a very long time. Tom Clancy wrote about the F-117 long before
it was publicly acknowledged in his "Red Storm Rising". He concluded that something
like his "frisbees" existed just by researching in the public domain. (Wonder why this
guy is treated "special" by the military? He He..)
Picture a flashlight shining at a mirror. The light reflects back to you. First step is to
angle the mirror so you dont see the reflection. Thats a fractal approach. (F-117) Next Time,
lets change the mirror so that it is curved. Now your flashlight reflection is difused. We
will call this the "shape" approach. (JSF) Add some exotic material science, things that
treat and absorb radio frequency, and you get stealth design features and coatings.
(Some on F-117, superexotic on B-2) Add design tricks not visible on exterior,
and you got F-22/YF-23. How this is done is what you wont find in the public
domain. Just to stir the pot and bring the burned beans to the top, a flashlight
is a really poor model for a radar beam, and the mirror is even worse. For a radar
"mirror", it is called a "corner" reflector. Research Hint: Our visible wave lengths are so small
we measure them in angstroms. Some radar frequencies have greater wave lengths than
the objects they are used to view. Try to use visible light to see a molecule and you start
to get the picture. You are going to see the Radar Range Equation in a different way.
Have fun.
/\/ight\/\/ing