It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Choronzon
Where were you in 2001, when the planet-x crazies said the world was going to end back then?
Originally posted by xnibirux
Real pictures of Nibiru! SO PREPARE FOR THIS!
[edit on 16-1-2008 by xnibirux]
Originally posted by jfj123
Well one link was a fake bush speech that was edited together.
The 2nd video shows sundogs. Remember, nibiru must be a black hole so the video is either wrong or the 3600 year orbit is wrong.
Originally posted by projectvxn
You tube videos, random PDF's full of speculation and hear say. No figures, numbers, diagrams, or rough images. Just BS! Listen, the planet X phenomenon may in fact be real. But I have seen nothing but speculation and half finished work presented as evidence. I will say for the community that finding a planet several AU away is going to be more difficult to see than a star or a galaxy. It's a matter of light and radiation intensity. And if this "planet" does have a 3600 year orbit around the sun then we're not likely to see it for quite some time. Depending on the last time it was here. Assuming it was at all. The problem I have with this is that Nibiru would orbit damn near into interstellar space, right at the apex of the heliopause and the shock. Now that said..Voyager 2 I believe, detected a "dent" in the heliopause which they said might be interstellar EM fields...But I fail to see what is producing such a powerful em field out in the middle of nearly empty space. Gravity seems to fit the model a bit better. Voyager two is south of the ecliptic. So is the "dent" in the heliopause.
However, this is NOT proof of a Planet X or Brown Dwarf companion binary. It could be a large asteroid in loose orbit around the heliopause. And, Some asteroids DO produce not only their own gravity, but also EM fields. But these are usually low intensity fields. So that said. The only thing I'm asking for is some actual scientific work on this. I want people to put up or shut up on this issue..Because we can speculate about this BS all day long with no results of discernible value. Below is a link to an MSNBC article verifying my claims of the "dent". This is what one would call proof. People on this forum will soon see that my efforts will be purely scientific. And any speculation will be treated within the confines of scientific methodology. Because I don't believe in BSing people for the sake of getting attention. To get me to believe something is not very easy. With out, at the very least, clear connections between facts. But for the greater majority of issues, nothing less than scientifically sound work will convince me. This is one of those cases. Give me something HARD!
www.msnbc.msn.com...
Originally posted by xnibirux
Originally posted by jfj123
Well one link was a fake bush speech that was edited together.
The 2nd video shows sundogs. Remember, nibiru must be a black hole so the video is either wrong or the 3600 year orbit is wrong.
Believe what you want; that is all I will say.
Originally posted by jfj123
Well one link was a fake bush speech that was edited together.
The 2nd video shows sundogs. Remember, nibiru must be a black hole so the video is either wrong or the 3600 year orbit is wrong.
Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by xnibirux
Oh that's hogwash and you know it. Fact is if Planet X were getting close to use anyone with a decent back yard observatory would be able to detect an infrared blob with their telescopes. The internet is NOT the only source of information and I wish people would realize that already. Try finding Kuiper belt object related scientific journals. Because you know what? Big Brother Government, no matter how powerful they seem to be, are still ruled by people, and they can't suppress ALL the information. I first heard of planet x from a peer reviewed journal by a man named Dr. Robert Harrington formerly of the U.S. Naval Observatory. Look up the research and ignore the conspiracy theory behind his death. It was Natural, even if sudden.
And I have a right to ask for hard science and NOT speculation. I wanna see Sitchin style research, he's recovered alot of circumstantial evidence on the matter, nothing concrete, but then again no one has anything concrete. But don't expect me to buy more than there is to buy.
Originally posted by hildar
reply to post by xnibirux
This is so true, I in fact posted some evidence today of a few things and right off the bat someone stated to the fact they had never heard of the scientists that were reporting on these things. Can 26 scientists all be wrong? I dont think so. But we also need to realize that alot of the folks saying that all of this stuff is bull may be saying it to keep the truth away from people. I am sorry but some people just seem to enjoy debunking things even when its undebunkable.
I figure this way if someone doesnt like talking about Nibiru they dont have to come in. No one is telling them they have to believe in it are they?
Hilda
Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by xnibirux
Really? this makes no sense at all? So no one lies for personal gain?
I'm going to leave that statement aside for now and ask you where you got your info on our star being binary? And the asteroid belt? Are you sources planetary scientists? REAL ONES? I'm a close follower of many sciences and am one of the very few of this entire planet who actually know and understand the Scientific Method. Nothing that has come from the conspiracy theorists is science following this method. It's not real science. There's no scrutiny, it's all "Planet X is coming!" BS. Like I said, I believe that this could be very real based on circumstantial evidence pressed by Sitchin. I re-traced most of Sitchin's work and found it amazingly accurate. I even taught myself cuneiform for the sake of not being BS'd. Because I believe that it COULD be true doesn't mean that I believe every freakin' prediction made by crackpots on the net. And neither should you. Even Sitchin doesn't give an estimate less than 2086 or later for the arrival. Which means we've got a while to go. So please stop spreading this, it's not true and you know it.
Listen, I'm not trying to knock any work you have done. But people need to believe in something so bad that they're willing to be dooped into believing anything. They dress it up and make it sound scientific and in fact, as my experience in Scientific Methodology is concerned, it is not.
Go to Sitchin's website. God and everyone has ripped apart his Theories and misrepresented his information so much that it hurts me to see people like yourself being fooled by idiots that know less than YOU do.
Every website out there involving Sitchin's work puts their own spin on the circumstantial evidence that Sitchin spent 40 YEARS putting together. He's the Authority on the matter and how it connects with the Ancients. He has the actual credentials to DO this work. He's an REAL archaeologist, and a REAL expert on ancient as well as moder linguistics and language morphology.
www.sitchin.com...
Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by xnibirux
I don't put huge amounts of stock into any theory without having researched the matter myself. What you have exemplified without scrutiny, is unfortunate ignorance. I will no longer be posting replies to you Thread. I wish you well.
Originally posted by xnibirux
Honestly, why would someone make up a theory of a Brown Dwarf(sister to our own Sun)in our Solar System(which used to be Binary) that has a 3,600 year eliptical orbit in which it collided with Tiamat(now the asteroid belt -half of Tiamat- and Earth and our moon-the other half of Tiamat). It just doesn't make any sense to me that someone would just make something up like that.