Spiky UFO Brazil

I was just examining another recent story of purported ufo activity in, near, or around o'hare "interplanetary?" airport. As I was viewing the images I realized the craft looked noticeably similar to another "set" of crafts that I had noted approximately 1-2 yrs ago. I decided to search for the site I had seen the craft before. Some are still there yet if memory is consistent one that was photographed from upper earth orbit is no longer there. As I was analyzing the photos for similarities It occured to me that this craft also resembles some that are available at ufocasebook. The tower similarities are apparent though the "crown of thorns" as i am collecting it, was not observed. I did notice spike like protrusions extending from other craft though. I imagine that they could be some sort of antenna array or some other form of sensory equipment.

Originally posted by omnicron
reply to post by dntwastetime

 

It's aN ODD SHAPED KITE. And to the third poster. This is the problem with believers.

YOU GUYS HAVE TOO MUCH IMAGINATION THAT IT BLINDS YOUR ABILITY TO MAKE LOGICAL ASSESSMENT AND JUDGEMENT. It's a ballon people. MOve on to better things than grainy, shaky, unfocused, unreliable, blurry, pixelated youtube video footage with only an annoying irritating screamng boy who needs to get whacked with a baseball bat as a proof of credibility.

DNTWASTEYURTIME.


[edit on 26-12-2007 by omnicron]

Thats a pretty harsh statement your making. Show me that its a balloon and ill believe you.
Im pretty sure a balloon doesnt stay in one place...

Originally posted by Bspiracy

Originally posted by Bicyclerepair Man
Uh? I thought the Drone-pictures were a proven hoax, or were they not?

They were not and are still being discussed and seriously followed / discussed
www.abovetopsecret.com...

This ufo does not look like the drone. Granted it may have some spiky things on it

but as you can see here it's def NOT the drone. Or at least not the type we all know and love. This is a screen shot I "auto leveled, pasted on top of the original non-auto leveled and overlayed as "luminosity" in Photoshop.

I don't see a resemblance to any balloon either

seems real to me at this point.

b

Wow! now that you photoshoped it, it looks almost just like what i saw in Israel this past summer!!! i wrote a thread on it when i got back, but i didnt have any pics of it, however, i did draw a sketch of it!
check it out! My post

I think this needs some serious attention! thats two sightings now of this thing. I stated in my post that it seemed to change shape some too!

Heres the sketch i made from my original post:


You cant see the whole thing, but you can see it here:
Full Sketch

Sorry for all the *edits... I didnt want to make one lined posts so i just added to this one...
[edit on 27-12-2007 by Odessy]

[edit on 27-12-2007 by Odessy]

[edit on 27-12-2007 by Odessy]

[edit on 27-12-2007 by Odessy]

[edit on 27-12-2007 by Odessy]

reply to post by PureET


I thought you might like to check this out

Google This & Please watch the whole video


"The Disclosure Project 2001 Press Club Conference Video"

On Wednesday, May 9th 2001, over twenty military, intelligence, government, corporate and scientific witnesses came forward at the National Press Club in Washington, DC to establish the reality of UFOs or extraterrestrial vehicles, extraterrestrial life forms, and resulting advanced energy and propulsion technologies. The weight of this first-hand testimony, along with supporting government documentation and other evidence, will establish without any doubt the reality of these phenomena, according to Dr. Steven M. Greer, director of the Disclosure Project which hosted the event.

This must be a good video if omnicron is here.

Not sure what that thing is, but it's a good video none the less. I did some searches of balloons and came up with nothing that looked like the OP video.


However this did remind me of that Ecuador video from back in 1995..

to add my 1 penneth, it does resemble the type of phenomeno that was painted up in the sky by artists many years (hundreads) ago in a lot of art that depict what they cant interpretate as extra suns in the sky a very interesting vid, i dont take the balloon theory as it does seem to morph into different shapes or open out like a flower does. strange.

i vote kite

and IMHO it is not morphing / changing shape or cloaked as some claim

all those " changes " you extrapolate are simply attrocious camera work and poor auto focus

the camera is so unsteady - and zoom is pulled in and out repeadtedly , so the poor AF cannot keep up

its not rocket science

It does behave like a mylar balloon, I've mistakenly videod lots thinking they were of ET origin.

however it is clearly void of colour and can't see why someone would make a balloon of that shape with no colour unless there just nutz.

it apears weighted by the bottom under "spike" and stays perfectly upright for most portion of the video. untill around 3:00 mins when it tilts forward in one smoth action.

that dosent add up At all, if it were a baloon weighted like that(and it was) it wouldent turn on its axis and stay there, it would absoloutly "bob" back and forth. like the way a pendulum works.

so with that said I would conclude that this is not a balloon. I could be wrong.


theres also grey detail on the object. if it were a baloon it would have to have been massive! otherwise the object would be a black siluette.

so what ever it is judjung by how far away it is whick can be see from when they zoom out that it is very far away. it must be larger than say a small house.

does any of that make any sence?


I also though the camera work was above par. nobody carries a trypod with them everywhere they go even if you own one.

Youtube compresses Video to a shocking reduction with big solid squares.

we need the uncompressed Video... maybe e-mail the Video poster? for shaots or clips?



[edit on 27-12-2007 by TrentReznor]

Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by dntwastetime

 

What I find strange (besides the fact that São Paulo has 11 million people and apparently nobody else noticed this)

That's true. The north region in particular is mostly comprised of residential areas.

... is that the sound does not fit well with the images.
At a point near the end of the video, some seconds after the UFO reappearance, we can hear the woman saying that it was coming back, when it had already appeared in the image some time ago.

It could be because the audio and the video are not in sync, I don't know.

Hmm, I don't know... to me, the audio and the video appear to be in sync. But, at the very end, the woman says she has lost it, but the object was still iin view for a second or two.

Also, I could not hear it good enough, but it sounded like the woman was the only person saying that it was a flying saucer, the children were saying that it was an airplane or some other thing.

One of the boys says that it was a inclined airplane, but the woman and another boy say that it's not an airplane, they stated it was really a flying saucer. Then, after the morphing, a boy (likely the same skeptical one) says it's a balloon and the other boy retorted, stating that balloons don't change shape.

The audio is not very helpful in dismissing or confirming the UFO. The woman says that the object is very far away, which seems to be the case. At one time, one of the boys states that the object is going up. Then, near the end, the boy says it was coming towards them, which again seems to be the case.

However, one interesting statement by one of the boys, at 3:06: "Can you imagine it turning into a kite?"

Originally posted by LivEVi3E
reply to post by PureET

 

I thought you might like to check this out

Google This & Please watch the whole video


"The Disclosure Project 2001 Press Club Conference Video"

On Wednesday, May 9th 2001, over twenty military, intelligence, government, corporate and scientific witnesses came forward at the National Press Club in Washington, DC to establish the reality of UFOs or extraterrestrial vehicles, extraterrestrial life forms, and resulting advanced energy and propulsion technologies. The weight of this first-hand testimony, along with supporting government documentation and other evidence, will establish without any doubt the reality of these phenomena, according to Dr. Steven M. Greer, director of the Disclosure Project which hosted the event.

Hmmpph. That's old old news.

By the way Steven Greer is a pathological lying kook. A few years ago he claimed to have discovered scalar wave perpetual portable machine
and promised to show it to the world. Nothing. He said he went on board one of the ships with those aliens. No evidence whatsoever. He claimed that he can summon ufos. Bull. How about summonig them and let the whole members of the national press club take videos of it?

And one of the best, he claimed to have possesed an alien baby!!! Wow!!
And the list goes on and on. I don't know about you, but that's man is crazy!

Originally posted by 11one11
This must be a good video if omnicron is here.

Not sure what that thing is, but it's a good video none the less. I did some searches of balloons and came up with nothing that looked like the OP video.


However this did remind me of that Ecuador video from back in 1995..

I don't know what you are talking about.

And to the believers. Don't you think it is strange that the cameraman suddenly stopped recording? My hoax alarm bells are ringing.

It's a hoax! Fake! Being uploaded on YouTube for the gullible massess.

Fake! Fake! Fake!

reply to post by omnicron


your kidding right?

are you really going to post FAKE FAKE FAKE with no alternative to what it is.
sad brotha... i expected a little more.

I have no idea what it is, and I'll not pretend to know.

...though... I did find two cents in my pocket just now... and my momma always taught me to share...

It seems to me a balloon would move more, unless it was tied off and there wasn't much wind.

Could be a kite, though I would expect some more movement from that as well, at least some amount of 'flutter'.

However, as to the conclusion that because the film cut off before the end of the encounter as proof that it's a hoax... well, that's just ludicrous. No offense.

How many times has your battery died (on anything) in the middle of use?

How many times has your camera flashed you the 'memory card full' right at the epic climactic point of whatever.

How many times have you been taping something and then after a while, you decide you'd much rather just see if for yourself than fuss any longer with the camera. Then, a moment later, something grand happens and you say to yourself "Dag! I should've kept filming!".

I've had all three circumstances countless times. Is it what happened here? I don't know, but neither do you. My rather long winded point is that we cannot conclude hoax and shoot the messenger because you didn't see from start to end. This is not a scientific experiment with catalogs of data and precise, planned recording... this is some schmuck with a video camera that just happened to catch something out of the ordinary.

reply to post by memoir


Or maybe he was thinking, you tube only allows for 10 minute videos, unless your someone special, -and i'm not-, so I only gotta film this thing for 5 minutes or so to fool the masses?

I'm tired of people who "get off" on hoaxing the community. I am no skeptic, but I'm jaded, and it's getting tiresome. Really, In this day and age, we're gonna need something more than poor video, that cuts out as the object gets closer? *boggle*

C'mon batteries running out in 5 minutes? card full? his arm got tired?ect, ect.

I could see if maybe it was a 30+ minute video.

It's not change shape imo, it just pitching and lumbering in the soft winds slowly, like an un-manned balloon or kite would. That's what I see anyhow, but everyone is entiteled to thier own opinions of course, and I may change mine if better evidence if brought forth.

Like the sketch posted earlier. Very similiar.

But Chupacabra, claws?

Someone did a nice job of stabilizing the good footage of the craft near the end of the original video.

It makes it clear that the craft holds a steady orientation and is not rotating.

www.youtube.com...

reply to post by Odessy


I said "Fake! Fake! Fake!" Simply because the cameraman stopped recording when it comes to the important part. Same as the rest of the fakes.

So I repeat:

"Fake! Fake! Fake!"


[edit on 27-12-2007 by omnicron]

Nice followup OP . It almost seems like we can see the spikes as they begin to protrude from it. Interesting.

I'm no expert, but I've never seen anything like that before. I also haven't seen any conclusive evidence being presented here that tells me that this is a kite or a balloon or whatever else. We have a lot of empty words and opinions and some not so convincing photographic comparisons.

Here's what we have:

Snapshot from Original


Comparisons presented so far:










I'm still searching for explanations of what that could be but have come up empty. To me the above pictures don't explain away that object. And the new stabilized video makes this case a bit more interesting imo.

No one is saying alien here that I can see. And if you are then I think you're getting ahead of yourself. Point is, we'll never be able to say if it's alien or not with this particular video. The best we'll be able to do here is to determine whether we can identify it or not.

So to me this is still unidentified. Yes, a UFO. And that's all that can be said with regard to what we have so far: A grainy and blurry home video of a strange looking hovering spoked object during a cloudy day.

reply to post by IAttackPeople


Still blurry as hell. Still pixelated as hell. I don't see this as a definite proof.

For long as you know. It's CGI. And don't anyone dare telling me it's not possible to fake camera shakes. It's been done before countless of times.

If it's digital video. It can be faked. As Rick Baker always say:

"We can do it better"

If it's not ballon, it's CGI. If it's not a kite. It's CGI. There's no definite concrete proof that this is alien, black project or Santa Claus. It doesn't even resemble with any of the previous UFO sightings, be it fake or unexplained.

"It's a fake. We can do it better"

Originally posted by omnicron
Still blurry as hell. Still pixelated as hell. I don't see this as a definite proof.

Yes blurry and pixelated, but definite proof of what exactly? An alien spaceship? No one here has said that.

If it's not ballon, it's CGI. If it's not a kite. It's CGI.

Is that the best you can do? Show some examples.

...no definite concrete proof that this is alien, black project or Santa Claus.

I agree.

doesn't even resemble with any of the previous UFO sightings, be it fake or unexplained.

So what. Is there some kind of identification table for UFO's?

"It's a fake. We can do it better"

Empty words. And I think you're missing the point here. Unidentifiable or unexplained doesn't necessarily mean alien or that it's some kind of hoax.

Something can go unexplained and remain there without ever having been classified as alien.

edit typo.

[edit on 27-12-2007 by 11one11]

They are saying "It's really an UFO!" "It's so beautiful" "It's changing its shape!"
I'm brazilian but I can't understand a single word of what they are saying in the beginning.

It is too steady to be a ballon.