It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The following are signatories to the Dec. 13th letter to the Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General of the United Nations on the UN Climate conference in Bali:
The UN climate conference in Bali has been planned to take the world along a path of severe CO2 restrictions, ignoring the lessons apparent from the failure of the Kyoto Protocol, the chaotic nature of the European CO2 trading market, and the ineffectiveness of other costly initiatives to curb greenhouse gas emissions. Balanced cost/benefit analyses provide no support for the introduction of global measures to cap and reduce energy consumption for the purpose of restricting CO2 emissions. Furthermore, it is irrational to apply the "precautionary principle" because many scientists recognize that both climatic coolings and warmings are realistic possibilities over the medium-term future.
Climate scientists reported in the December issue of the International Journal of Climatology, published by Britain's Royal Meteorological Society, that observed temperature changes measured over the last 30 years don't match well with temperatures predicted by the mathematical climate models relied on by the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
"Can the models accurately explain the climate from the recent past? It seems that the answer is no," said lead study author David H. Douglass, a physicist specializing in climate at the University of Rochester."We do not see accelerated warming in the tropical troposphere," said Christy. "Instead, the lower and middle atmosphere are warming the same or less than the surface."
clues to a new natural contribution to the melt arose when scientists discovered a thin spot in the Earth’s crust under the northeast corner of the Greenland Ice Sheet where heat from Earth’s insides could seep through, scientists will report here this week at a meeting of the American Geophysical Union.
Originally posted by 2believeor0
Joining the party a little late ....
The US is not destroying the world ... we all are! Good job everyone!
But certainly the US has the biggest responsibility in reducing energy consumption and CO2 emissions - afterall it is unfair to ask a country that barely feeds over a billion to do it before one that feeds 300 million quite comfortably.
The fight has to start at home. We all know the drill - walk when you can instead of driving, turn down the heat, stop using plastic bags and reuse, reuse, reuse, reuse, reuse before you recycle. etc. etc. etc.
Originally posted by 2believeor0
The US is not destroying the world ... we all are! Good job everyone!
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
Wow. People STILL believe in the fairy tale of man-made global warming? I figured with all the much better scientific evidence out there pointing to a natural cycle of global warming created by an active period of solar activity
episode of Bulls***.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
[edit on 063131p://bFriday2007 by Stormdancer777]
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
Good idea! Totally ignore China and India and blame the USA!
The next ice age will arrive about 1600 years. It cannot be
slowed down or stopped by anyone. It's a natural cycle of
the planet Earth. Why don't you just move to the moon?
There's no global warming on the moon.
We should have the technology and means to get there
and back soon. It should be a 2 hour flight in nonlinear time.
Originally posted by LiamStemrad
JIMBO-
Please, sir/madame....don't fall for this hoax. Mankind can't hurt God's creation. No, really, we can't.
Don't believe everything the mainstread media spews out in regards to mankind afftecting the climate in a negative way.
I'll make a prediction...in 5 years, all these soft-heads that are warning us about warming, will be singing a different tune. Back to an impending ICE AGE threat, I'm sure