It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Disclosed
The plane impacts did not, but the plane impact also started the fires, which then started a chain of events that led to the collapse. This is what the official reports state.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Do you have FBI crime scene reports that state the impacts and fires caused the collapse?
Originally posted by Disclosed But, oddly enough, I DO have access to the NIST reports, the FEMA reports, and the 911 commission reports that all say the following:
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
NIST reports have stated the fires did not get hot enough or burn long enough to cause the collapse.
The only official reports are from the FBI and NTSB.
Originally posted by Disclosed
You have stated this exact thing many times. Please show us which report stated that very statement. You can search every NIST report, and not once find the term "did not get hot enough or burn long enough".
So the 911-commission report, created by congressional legislation, and signed by the president, is not an official report?
NIST developed a method to characterize maximum temperatures experienced by steel members using observations of paint cracking due to thermal expansion. The method can only probe the temperature reached; it cannot distinguish between pre- and post-collapse exposure. More than 170 areas were examined on the perimeter column panels ...
Only three locations had evidence that the steel reached temperatures above 250 °C.
These areas were:
• WTC 1, east face, floor 98, column 210, inner web,
• WTC 1, east face, floor 92, column 236, inner web,
• WTC 1, north face, floor 98, column 143, floor truss connector
Other forensic evidence indicates that the last example probably occurred in the debris pile after collapse. Annealing studies on recovered steels established the set of time and temperature conditions necessary to alter the steel microstructure. Based on the pre-collapse photographic evidence, the microstructures of steels known to have been exposed to fire were characterized. These microstructures show no evidence of exposure to temperatures above 600 °C for any significant time.
Similar results, i.e., limited exposure if any above 250 °C, were found for two core columns from the fire-affected floors of the towers.
Further digging yields that the structure would likely have been condemned in another few years because of the way that bolts rapidly degrade over time. The relative size of the structure shares a near exponential relationship to the rate at which the structure degrades (if it's bigger - it usually degrades MUCH faster).
We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranatural sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National auto-determination practiced in past centuries.
Originally posted by Aim64C
That works on the pieces of metal that have paint....
Also, I have some issues with the cracking of paint being an indicator of thermal expansion (or of temperatures).
Also - recall what I said about the brackets. Remember, you have several hundred tons of force distributed across a total surface area that is probably less than the table your monitor is sitting on. This is also across a round surface... so we have even more to consider in how much point-force is applied.
Originally posted by Aim64C
I never said I completely agreed with everything in ANY reports. I simply know what I saw - a very large plane slamming into a very large building, lots of fire and smoke, and eventually the building fell down. Which does not come as a surprise to me.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
You may have seen a plane hit the building but that does not mean the plane brought it down.
All the reports and evidence i have state the plane impacts and fires did not cause the collapse.
Originally posted by Aim64C
I don't know how old you are - but, I used to think pretty similarly when I was younger. I used to be "all or nothing" with approaches to personality, reports, and... well - everything. But as I've gotten older, and as I've been experiencing life.... I've learned that this isn't the case.
Regardless of whether or not someone was being debilitating to our intelligence community's capability to intercept this terrorist plot or not - there were a number of things that were going on that should not have been going on within our agencies. The FBI and CIA were not effectively communicating (this is still a problem within the military - many forms of communication are poorly implemented or not properly maintained/understood by the people operating them - as a person used to working with networked databases, this frustrates me to no end - because it's not that hard, and they make it look like rocket science). We are improving... slowly - but eventually, our agencies will miss another one. It may not be for another fifty years. It may be tomorrow.