It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by twitchy
Originally posted by snoopy
I DON'T NEED EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY.
Well, then that's all I ever need to know about your opinions of 9-11, I'm done with you. Thanks for playing.
Originally posted by spacevisitor
Hi Soloist,
There are only three reasons why you can’t here the explosions.
1. You don’t want to here them.
2. You have hearing problems of what I really not hope.
3. You don’t believe all those people, reporters, civilians, fire-fighters, policemen and on who speaks about explosions.
How many footage do you want with explosions?
Originally posted by Nola213
1)Electric shorts will not melt steel, they will short out and blow and that will be the end of it, they WILL NOT continue to melt steel for over 30 minutes
In large buildings, they do not put electrical mains on the outside corners or walls of the bulding.
My guess is that pod was filled with Thermite/thermate. I bet the first plane had a similiar pod,
I swear the whole hologramand Fake plane nonsense has really ruined the truth movement.
Mr. Lear his own forum, and he started talking about holograms.
Disinfo anyone?
Originally posted by snoopy
Originally posted by Nola213
Here is Demo Debris At Ground Zero, Tell me, how Crumbling produces these perfect Shape charge Cuts at Ground zero?
Those columns they show were cut by torches by cleanup/recovery crews.
Originally posted by snoopy
Another issue that disproves thermite is that there was absolutely no Barium Nitrate, the key ingredient and of which there would be an abundance of if it were used.
12. Did the NIST investigation look for evidence of the WTC towers being brought down by controlled demolition? Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues? The combination of thermite and sulfur (called thermate) "slices through steel like a hot knife through butter."
NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel.
More importantly is that these claims are simply pure conjecture and have no merit.
But in these cases it's simply putting the cart before the horse. Determining that there is a conspiracy theory, and then trying to find ways to validate that belief by imagining various ways in which it could have been done.
Originally posted by snoopy
And my opinion still stands that unless a claim has some proof behind it, it is not valid.
Why would they cut at such a perfect angle to cut debris free?
Why would they cut at such a straight line and almost perfectly horizontal...i.e. no amount of "human user freehand mistakes"?
Originally posted by Griff
Why would they cut at such a perfect angle to cut debris free?
Why would they cut at such a straight line and almost perfectly horizontal...i.e. no amount of "human user freehand mistakes"?
Why would they cut the debris so far above their head (remember they would have had to bring in a ladder or cherry picker to do that cut) when they could have just as easily cut at normal height?
by the way these pictures were taken at ground Zero only hours after the demolitions of Building one and two. Again explosions don't cut steel on perfect 45 degree angles.
Originally posted by ferretman2
You are blatantly spreading false facts... Those pictures are not from 1-2 hours after the collapse....try 1 to 2 weeks.
Originally posted by Griff
A few questions on cutting columns by cleanup/recovery crews.
Why would they cut at such a perfect angle to cut debris free?
Why would they cut at such a straight line and almost perfectly horizontal...i.e. no amount of "human user freehand mistakes"?
Why would they cut the debris so far above their head (remember they would have had to bring in a ladder or cherry picker to do that cut) when they could have just as easily cut at normal height?
Just a few things for the people who "know" that that column was cut by hand. That's a pretty perfect cut by hand for debris to be thrown away (err smelted down....err gotten rid of). Or to be hurridly cut to rescue someone IMO.
[edit on 11/2/2007 by Griff]
[edit on 11/2/2007 by Griff]
[edit on 11/2/2007 by Griff]
Originally posted by ferretman2
The pictures are of the clean up effort.
Originally posted by snoopy
I don't know the answers to all the questions so I will talk to a welder to find out for you.
Originally posted by twitchy
I'm not trying to be facetious, just asking what date were the pictures taken, do you know? You are saying they are as much as two weeks after the collapse, but you didn't source that information. Obviously, the source and dating of the pictures are important if they are to be entered as evidence to either side of the debate.
Originally posted by Griff
I wonder why cameras weren't allowed on site down there?