Proof Positive: WTC-Controlled Demolition

reply to post by indierockalien


what do you make of the fact no demolition debris was found, as attested to by a demolition expert in the video I posted ?

surely you understand demolitions require equipment like blasting caps, wiring, detonators, etc

How do you explain that of all the volunteers who had demo experience, no one found any evidence of it ?

reply to post by syrinx high priest


Nice video Syrinx, I love the pancaking CGI that still Show's ALL OF THE CORE Standing!, lmao.

Come back with something better please.

Pancaking is BS imo, it caannot defy gravity and resistance WITHOuT Explosives.

And there ARE tons of videos out there of people hearing numerous blasts, and firecrackling "demo charge" noises. C'mon. You gotta dig for this stuff, Fox and CNN aren't gonna put it in your face like their paid witnesses on every video.

Here is Demo Debris At Ground Zero, Tell me, how Crumbling produces these perfect Shape charge Cuts at Ground zero?

www.youtube.com...

There's your proof of Demolition Debris at ground zero. At least they got some on video before Gulliani swooped in there, to clear all the Debris, oops, Shoulda been "evidence".

Originally posted by Nola213
Here is Demo Debris At Ground Zero, Tell me, how Crumbling produces these perfect Shape charge Cuts at Ground zero?

www.youtube.com...

There's your proof of Demolition Debris at ground zero. At least they got some on video before Gulliani swooped in there, to clear all the Debris, oops, Shoulda been "evidence".

that video just poses a question. That's not evidence. I'm asking for the type of evidence the demolitions expert mentions in the video I posted, wiring, etc. Where is that ?

reply to post by Nola213


I guess you didn't watch the video I posted. That's a shame, you're the OP, right ?

controlled demolition requires huge detonations, which would have been audible for miles. I was at madison square garden that day on a business call. I can tell you my own ears didn't hear anything.

the explosions would have been heard in NJ, and on LI

why haven't literally millions of people come forward with their testimony ?

reply to post by syrinx high priest


Well syrinx high priest, I strongly advise you to watch and listen to this film.
The distance to the towers is enormous but still you hear the detonations very clearly.

www.whatreallyhappened.com...

Originally posted by syrinx high priest
reply to post by Nola213

 

I guess you didn't watch the video I posted. That's a shame, you're the OP, right ?

controlled demolition requires huge detonations, which would have been audible for miles. I was at madison square garden that day on a business call. I can tell you my own ears didn't hear anything.

the explosions would have been heard in NJ, and on LI

why haven't literally millions of people come forward with their testimony ?

There havn't been millions because the concensious that day was the planes hit the towers and then they fell. Most people believe that and don't think into it. I must admit, if I were there and saw all the events, I would probably have a mental block that wouldn't allow me to think any further then that. But since I am thinking further, I do some research and find out more and more information that points to a conspiracy. The thing about conspiracies is they never get solved. JFK? Anyway, there are pleanty of firefighters who witnessed out of the ordinary things like explosions at the base, explosions that destroyed some of the lowest floors as they were there to see. Problem is they were ignored by the commision. That's were they had to be cut off and ignored in order for the conspiracy to be successfull. If their testimony was considered, then we wouldn't be debating this and the report wouldn't be what it is today, a conspiracy cover-up.

Originally posted by spacevisitor
reply to post by syrinx high priest

 

Well syrinx high priest, I strongly advise you to watch and listen to this film.
The distance to the towers is enormous but still you hear the detonations very clearly.

www.whatreallyhappened.com...

And you know they are detonations how?

Originally posted by Nola213
Here is Demo Debris At Ground Zero, Tell me, how Crumbling produces these perfect Shape charge Cuts at Ground zero?

www.youtube.com...

There's your proof of Demolition Debris at ground zero. At least they got some on video before Gulliani swooped in there, to clear all the Debris, oops, Shoulda been "evidence".

Those columns they show were cut by torches by cleanup/recovery crews. What that video shows is that people claiming to be presenting truth are often frauds. The fact that they are so bold as to present this as evidence is astonishing. The fact that people fall for these tricks is scary.

reply to post by Nola213


I have just read a interesting bit of information at tbrnews.orggo to archive and read Oct 22 post, It explains some of this. The article paraphrased states that the Israeli Mossad (infiltrated agent) had given the WTC Building plans to the terrorist and showed them where to hit for the maximum destruction. To assure to emphasis the incident, Mossad agents also placed thermite charges in the floor structures for ten floors around the expected impact site. The charges were set to go off when the heat from the fires got high enough. The charges were set at angles like any other demolition charges to insure the collapse of those floors. This was all done to win the support of the American people, and to help the Israeli's to get rid of a enemy in the middle east( Hussien) Read the post and decide for yourself. It is the only explanation that make any sense to me.

And the proof used by TBDRNews.org is? I mean ignoring that they clearly don't understand much about how thermite or even explosives work.

reply to post by syrinx high priest


Hey can I read that? I never heard that before... BUT... for one thing, the people who cleared away the rubble, which almost all was shipped away to some secret location never to be seen again, were probably not thinking about searching for blast caps or other demo debris. They were thinking about clearing away debris and getting to bodies and people who may still have been trapped under the rubble. I don't think anyone who was there at the scene was really thinking about conspiracies at that point, so maybe there were plenty of blast caps, but maybe the people who moved the debris away (most likely) weren't demo experts, so if they had seen blast caps and whatnot, prolly thought it was part of the building's wiring, and never even gave it a second thought.

And to be honest, your source will probably be biased, but I'm not really a big "9/11 truther", so I'll take a look at what you got and take it into account.

I just know what I saw, and my senses tell me that it was all very very fishy.

I didn't really ever pay attention to the specific "evidence" brought forth by the truthers and their movies (which I'm not bashing the Truthers because I'm on their same page)... but I more or less just re-watched all the footage from that day, saw the pictures of the pentagon from that day, remembered building 7's fall, saw all the things the government did before and after 9/11, and my common sense could no longer agree with the official version of the story.



[edit on 28-10-2007 by indierockalien]

Originally posted by snoopy
And the proof used by TBDRNews.org is? I mean ignoring that they clearly don't understand much about how thermite or even explosives work.

I don't mean to be rude, but I guess you must be a demolitions expert.

haha if you are then I'll shut up. But seriously, scientific data aside, just look at it all, man! The official story, or even various other interpretations of the official story, just doesn't explain the building's collapses correctly. It doesn't explain what a lotta people thought the buildings would do if they were to fall. They didn't topple over. They vaporized. How does a jet crash cause a building to vaporize????

haha if you are then I'll shut up. But seriously, scientific data aside, just look at it all, man! The official story, or even various other interpretations of the official story, just doesn't explain the building's collapses correctly. It doesn't explain what a lotta people thought the buildings would do if they were to fall. They didn't topple over. They vaporized. How does a jet crash cause a building to vaporize????

sorry
for the
double
post.

Originally posted by indierockalien

I don't mean to be rude, but I guess you must be a demolitions expert.

Do you think the people who wrote that article making such claims are?

Originally posted by indierockalien
haha if you are then I'll shut up. But seriously, scientific data aside, just look at it all, man! The official story, or even various other interpretations of the official story, just doesn't explain the building's collapses correctly. It doesn't explain what a lotta people thought the buildings would do if they were to fall. They didn't topple over. They vaporized. How does a jet crash cause a building to vaporize????

Well, ignoring the fact that the buildings in no way what so ever vaporized or did anything that could even be misunderstood as vaporize, perhaps you could explain it to us. Please point out these problems and the mistakes that were made, and how it really happened.

No, but I know that some of them have consulted with demo experts. I know that I myself met a structural engineer who's friend is a demo expert whilst I was down in florida over the summer, and he said that both him and his friend knew right away that something was very very wrong, and he went into great depth about how steel buildings behave, and how damaged buildings should behave, and his friend had taught him about the demo trade and he was explaining in depth about thermate and the likes, and I really wish I would've brought my tape recorder with, because what he said was golden... and this was a guy from England, and the dude was loaded because his hotel room was like a friggin mansion... so obviously, he's quite good at what he does, and I trusted his opinion.

They didn't literally vaporize... jeez. You know what I meant, smarty pants.

[edit on 28-10-2007 by indierockalien]