posted on Jun, 8 2008 @ 01:12 AM
Here's my question to you. If the Government were responsible for the attack, why would they need the E-4b in the area of operations on 9/11? They
can Presumibly operate anywhere in the world. so why not sit off the coast of alaska pretending to be controling operations there when you are really
running covert ops back home? Or for that matter have a guy sitting in a bus on the highway, with a laptop...
The questions of if the "E-4b were really being used for military training excercises in Alsaka/Canada, why was one over DC?" Is not really
relevent, as it can function as a C&C Presumibly anywhere in the world.
As to the issue of full disclosure? Why would they confirm it? So that China knows exactly where it took off from, how long it took to get airborne,
It's flight speed, area of operation during a giveing time frame... it just doesn't make any sense to confirm anything to your enemy even if they
do have you on sattelite. I know if my wife caught me cheating dead to rights, I would give her zero information about it. She'd just use it
against me later on. (Provided I wasn't dead already)
And as to the location of the 3rd E-4 it was probibly close by Bush in Florida as it is used as secondary transportaion incase AF! is taken out
unexpectidly.
*Edit* Bah sorry to bump such an old thread, It's what brought me to this site, and I didn't think it would bump, just flag... Oh well now I know
not to go digging back to far.
[edit on 8-6-2008 by coldain]