Bill Maher Throws Out 911 Protester!!

reply to post by Johnmike


I, for one, did not think they looked like clowns in the least bit. But, even if they did, it doesn't matter. The government's version of events is so implausible that a image campaign is unnecessary-the conspiracy theory is now mainstream with more and more big names coming forward everyday saying the official version of events doesn't make sense.

Just remember, Einstein looked like a complete buffoon and relativity is now taught in textbooks everywhere.

Sorry if I hijack the thread, lord knows Bill Mahyer is very important. But I can't stand all the people here wearing blinders.

I can't believe with all the video evidence people STILL can't come to grips that this was a False Flag Terror operation.a little LIHOP.Yes your Goverment LET THIS HAPPEN, to fuel it's war machine, for monetary gain, and power. Not to mention they're lieing in bed with the Bin'Ladens.

But it was more than just look the other way, they also Helped it along (the demolition of WTC1,2,7) with the weeks of unprecedented power downs before 9/11, giving workers with no company logo access to strategig building points to plant shape charges(I mean they couldn't really leave something so crucial in the hands of 19 guys with hangovers, this had to be complete and total demolition) Bomb sniffing dogs pulled off duty, by whom do you ask? oh a Memeber of the Busch Family was in charge of WTC security, now that is pretty coicidental wouldn't ya say?...hmmm I wonder why.

C'mon is the Average American this dense? Can you really believe no explosives were used?

-Thermite pouring out of the building exactly where it begins to collapse (I believe it was WTC2, i might be wrong).

-Shape charges. pictures takens before Gulliani and crew could clear the "crime scene" of huge support colums cute at a 45 degree angle close to ground level.

-Small charges (only recently were these videos leaked, good job who ever got out the real copies before they were doctored, like most of the "official" tapes we see now) you know the small flash bangs that sound like fire crackers and gunfire, and look like brife sparks all of the building as its coming down.

-Squibs (I won't even get into it, cause people who can't handle it ill go with the PM theory of AIR, lol Air escaping 20 floors below collapse), during the "pancaking". I love that "pancake collapse, AT FREE FALL SPEED. Yea, go on and believe it.

-Explosions in the basement, caught on film, smoke rising from the ground of the WTC complex 30 seconds before the towers fell. (This was backed up by multiple witnesses who were in the basement.)

-Buildings damage on on side mostly my a plane, should fall over to that side. TIMBEEER! anyone? Nope, straight down collapse, free fall speed in its own footprint.

-Smaller buildings closer to WTC1 and 2, still stand, while 7, a 40+ floor skyscraper comes down due to two small fires. A worlds first!!!!!

-The BBC(basically the Illuminati media) BBC,CNN,ABC,CBS,NBC,FOX,WB11 ALL IN on it. But back to my point the BBC reorts the collapse of 7 , 20 somewhat minutes before it actually collapses.

-Lies about 93. Lets Roll?, Sorry never happened. Plane was shot down. But Lets Roll is a better story, and gets more people angry and ready to shoot some brown people. Rumsfeild "Shot down 93", Yep he said it. Debunk that one.

-Pentagon , supposedly one of the most secure, if not THE MOST secure building in the Free World, and there is not any clear secerity video of a Boeing hitting the Building. I mean c'mon, how dumb do they think we ARE? I'm glad I ain't that dumb because I cannot look past this mountain of lies and evidence. But it seems some of you Mahyer Fanbois can? I just, can't grasp it.

-Wargames going on at this exact time, putting all of our air defense on the other side of the Country, in a sililiar circumstance to confuse things even further.

I could go on for an hour or two with points just as strong as these,but I'll stop with, one of the more damning...

-Larry Silverstein. MADE a HUGE amount of money off the death of Americans, as did MANY people who had prior knowledge, with their put options, and god knows how many other ways there were to make money if you knew this was gonna happen on 9/04.
Those infamous two words, you can spin em all you want, he said "PULL IT". Now it does not and never has refered to people. If he meant get the firemen out. Why didn't he say Pull "them" out.? I'm sorry but IT refers to an object/thing, like a Building for instance. Do not try to tell me with a straight face that you honestly belive when he said "Pull it", he meant anything OTHER than Pulling down Building 7.


Your Government has Lied to you, and has killed your friends and familiy.More and more are dieing daily in Iraq. You have been manipulated, and played by the goverment you pledged allegiance to every day in school for 12 or 13 years, it's a hard pill to swallow I know, but please, Come to grips with it, and help us do something about it. For the love of all that is good and right in this country. Your freedoms are at stake here.

You can start by Voting for Ron Paul this coming election. Do the right thing. Get these criminals out of office and power.


*apologies for any and all spelling errors.



[edit on 22-10-2007 by Nola213]

reply to post by section8citizen


Section8,

I'm not sure what the actual legal term would be but it would have to do with breach of trust for the security of the complex. Also the Disrupting the filming of a live show is what made me assume Disturbing the peace would be the quickest charge. that said forgive my argumentativeness on this topic as I am quiting smoking today this particular topic pissed me off.

I guess a good way to see my logic of it would be that you have your own TV show. Some group keeps harassing you (lets say NAMBLA) because they want to come on your show. you have no interest in the topic and state that clearly. there response is to picket your show. so you make a joke about NAMBLA... Do they really have the right to come into YOUR SHOWS STUDIO and SCREW UP YOUR show?


So please forgive the tude... I just put myself in Bill's Shoes in this situation.

reply to post by coven


When ~3,000 people were slaughtered and the government's not interested in the truth getting out, I'd say what the protesters did was entirely appropriate.

reply to post by uberarcanist

That is your opinion and you are entitled to it.

I on the other hand have a different opinion.

Sorry if that bothers you.

reply to post by coven


I never said you weren't. Just bear in mind that the protesters believe that their actions are 100% justified. Expect further such acts in the future.

reply to post by uberarcanist


Then justify them against bill.
Now I’m all for the right to protest, and there have been 9/11 protests but this is not the way to go about it.

reply to post by uberarcanist


But of course. But I will not fall prey to criminals crying 'police brutality' when they bring it upon themselves.

There are ways to make a point without disrupting a private studio set and the LIVE show being filmed on it. Hell Have Jim Marrs Call and represent you guys!
Bill might just let him on.

all I'm saying is that there are THOUSANDS of options like this. To react to a person saying no to you like this is equivalent to a four year old throwing a tantrum. The parents will only put up with it SO long.

I would hate to see a great show like bills go recorded and edited. Hell at least you have(had now) a chance of speaking about it on his show and a few million Americans(and god knows how many internationals) getting your message. that chance is now GONE.

I hate to see this happen because it is a scar on the cheek of the truth movement.

reply to post by coven


Like I said before, a few goofballs does nothing to hurt the truth movement. Furthermore, I don't care that they got thrown out...that's Bill's right. I'm just applauding them for what they did.

reply to post by uberarcanist


I guess I could understand where your coming from based off of your name.
(not a dig or anything)

I consider myself more of a gandhi anarchist. silent but deadly.

reply to post by coven


Nononono...it's ARCANIST, not ANARCHIST. A cryptic D&D reference, not a political philosophy.

reply to post by uberarcanist


LOL... As an Alchemist in WOW I should have caught that.

Thats it... Thats just proof its time for me to tape out for the night and do something important.

=P

till tomorrow all!

I think it is awesome that someone as left as Maher has the balls to stand up to these morons. This is disruption. Nothing more. What new in the last 6 freakin years has the truth movement or anyone else bought forward with hard, PHYSICAL evidence.

My eight year old son this weekend said,

"Daddy, don't you think it is weird that there were 2 towers and it happened of 9/11, 11 like two towers?"

I said yes, that is a good comparison. I then asked him if he knew that terrorists had attacked before, and he said no.

I then asked him if he thought that terrorists or our government would have attacked the trade center, and he said

" Daddy, that stuff only happens in the movies, everyone knows that could never happen, Army men are really good and anyone can be bad, not just army men"

An eight year old sees the difference in fantasy and reality, so why is it so hard for so called college educated individuals to realize we need to prepare so it does not happen again. Protest for more protection.

It is Bills show, and he says they hang out all the time. Pathetic.

reply to post by esdad71


As if the weird stock trades and the government's "nothing to see here" attitude about them isn't enough evidence? What more do you freakin' want?

[edit on 22-10-2007 by uberarcanist]

Originally posted by uberarcanist
I, for one, did not think they looked like clowns in the least bit. But, even if they did, it doesn't matter. The government's version of events is so implausible that a image campaign is unnecessary-the conspiracy theory is now mainstream with more and more big names coming forward everyday saying the official version of events doesn't make sense.

Because invading some guy's show and making him stop it because you can't shut up about something completely unrelated is mature. It's one thing to spread ideas and protest, it's another to be a rude jackass.

Originally posted by uberarcanist
Just remember, Einstein looked like a complete buffoon and relativity is now taught in textbooks everywhere.

Einstein didn't start screaming about his theories during other people's lectures like an ass.

Seems to me that if a group of people decided to "protest" on a live show they would premeditate their actions carefully and not just blurt out things in such a random fashion. It makes absolutely no sense to me.

I'm not going to point fingers or speculate because that rarely accomplishes anything. But, I will say that I would love to see the people who were "protesting" positively identified and better yet interviewed. Only to establish that they are indeed members of the so called movement. If anyone could point me towards information in this regard it would be appreciated.

It is unfortunate that in a country where free speech once reigned, people are forced because of fear and humiliation to remain silent. Sadly it appears in this case those who did have the courage to speak out lacked the mental prowess needed to convey an effective message.

Interestingly enough the end result paints all involved in a negative light. Maher comes off as a childish bully, his guests come off as cowards afraid to even acknowledge WTC 7 (watch Mathews, he almost bites but checks himself) and the "911 truthers" come across as unorganized, unintelligent, and all together useless.

As I read through the posts I have a lot of different thoughts come up, but just to stay strictly on thread, I believe that when the We Are Change people disrupted Mahar's show, the only people that didn't benefit were the guests Bill was trying to interview. Everyone else made out like bandits.

Mark my words, when ratings start to drop, Bill will create his own talk show terrorists to come in and wreck the show just to get viewers. The "change" guys should start contracting that service out, when they are not doing genuine disruptions. That way everybody wins.

Originally posted by theRiverGoddess
I saw the whole show.
Here the panel were discussing a topic and some crazy 'shouter' was yelling crap from the audience. You could not understand a thing they said just the garbled continued shouting. They could have been yelling about Mickey Mouse and Minnie breaking up for all you could understand

at one point you could hear them shout "building 7" but if your not INTO the subject you would not know what they meant by that anyway.......they came off looking like MORONS IMO.............after the guy gets tossed out on his ear a woman starts in with the ranting...........she was no easier to understand than they screaming guy was

DUH

Way to set back 'Truth Coming Out' on THAT subject, making the whole topic look like a giant joke.

I think Bill did the right thing getting the 'screamers' tossed ASAP.......its his show and he picks the topics not crazy seeming shouters in the audience.





[edit on 21-10-2007 by theRiverGoddess]

Thank God for HBO on Demand; I saw the whole show as well.

You guys who are arguing in favor of the CTs, watch the whole show! The panel was discussing something totally different from what the CTs are protesting! I'm not against the 9/11 theories, and it's okay to ask questions (I AM). However, when you HECKLE someone on a topic they aren't even addressing at this moment, you make all CTs look INSANE!

Not all of them are, and all that these "Truthers" as Glenn Beck called them do is give people like you and me a bad name. To protest 9/11 properly isn't to HECKLE a comedian on his show; it's to stage a peaceful protest like we have the right!

-oppdis

CNN ran a biased story on it... calling 9/11 truthers the new Timothy McVeighs here.

Golf clap for CNN. Morons.

reply to post by vat0r



I always hear about free speech, but I never hear about personal responsibility. With rights come responsibilities. There is no absolute freedom, as that is anarchy. In a civil society, there are appropriate times and places for voicing your views. When you are on private property, and on someone else's show, you don't have the absolute right to interrupt and say whatever you want. If you decide to excercise civil disobedience, than be a man/woman enough to face the consequences without whining and moaning about your rights.