The Hologram Theory is dead

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Problem is hologram projects that big are mostly still classified. Their are only a few hologram projects on the market.

Like the following:
www.heliodisplay.eu...

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by snoopy
Perhaps someone can present an example of a hologram being used in a similar event. Not so much a plane hitting a building, but in a way where holograms have been used and can convince people they are real by presenting shadows, sounds, and moving physical objects etc.

Problem is hologram projects that big are mostly still classified. Their are only a few hologram projects on the market.

Like the following:
www.heliodisplay.eu...

Originally posted by snoopy
And how do you know they are classified? And if they are classified, then how would you know they even have the technology to perform something so elaborate? How is it anything more than a guess? We see the holograms in your link, which is pretty much what most of us expect in the realm of holograms. Interesting, but anything but convincing.

Originally posted by ULTIMA1


Well maybe becasue i have access to some more resources that you do, being that i am a government analyst.

Originally posted by snoopy
So simply claiming to have some resources is not evidence. And I don't imagine people with access to such supposed technology sit around talking on discussion forums all day either.

Originally posted by six I do and I am not sure what they would have to do with the hologram hypothosis.

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by snoopy
So simply claiming to have some resources is not evidence. And I don't imagine people with access to such supposed technology sit around talking on discussion forums all day either.

Well do you know what the Commando Solo and Compass Call planes are ?

Compass Call is the designation for a modified version of Lockheed corporation's C-130 Hercules aircraft configured to perform tactical command, control and communications countermeasures or C3CM. Targeting command and control systems provides commanders with an immense advantage before and during the air campaign. COMPASS CALL provides a non-lethal means of denying and disrupting enemy command and control, degrading his combat capability and reducing losses to friendly forces.

The EC-130H Compass Call is the only US wide-area offensive information warfare platform, Compass Call provides disruptive communications jamming and other unique capabilities to support the Joint Force Commander across the spectrum of conflict. Specifically, the modified aircraft uses noise jamming to prevent communication or degrade the transfer of information essential to command and control of weapon systems and other resources. It primarily supports tactical air operations but also can provide jamming support to ground force operations.

Please visit the link provided for the complete story.

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by snoopy
So simply claiming to have some resources is not evidence. And I don't imagine people with access to such supposed technology sit around talking on discussion forums all day either.

Well do you know what the Commando Solo and Compass Call planes are ?

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by snoopy
So simply claiming to have some resources is not evidence. And I don't imagine people with access to such supposed technology sit around talking on discussion forums all day either.

Well do you know what the Commando Solo and Compass Call planes are ?

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by six I do and I am not sure what they would have to do with the hologram hypothosis.

Becasue those are the types of aircraft that would have a hologram in them. They are for psy ops.

Originally posted by jfj123
Well then here's something that could have helped avoid the whole Iraq WMD garbage. Simply project stationary targets, call other countries and tell them where they are, have them take pictures, INSTANT PROOF

They could have projected easily discernible weapons installations to give absolute proof to other countries

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by jfj123
Well then here's something that could have helped avoid the whole Iraq WMD garbage. Simply project stationary targets, call other countries and tell them where they are, have them take pictures, INSTANT PROOF

They could have projected easily discernible weapons installations to give absolute proof to other countries

The Compass Call projects decoys and is used for jamming.

Well there are the buried MIGs we found with the baaned equipment. Also the reports from defectors that most of the WMD material was moved to Syria.

Originally posted by craig732

Originally posted by craig732

Originally posted by johnlear
all airline traffic usually goes north into San Francisco

Originally posted by johnlear
Originally posted by craig732

I have a house very close to Newark Airport.

On different days, or even different hours, the planes will approach or depart the airport from different directions depending on wind direction.

Why do they do things differently in California?

Well the guys were 25 miles south of San Francisco International. The airplane flew over at 500 feet headed southbound. SFO is 25 miles north. An average altitude for 25 miles out is between 6000 and 8000 feet. And when they are that low it is customary for the airplane to be headed towards the airport. Not away.

Thanks for the post.

Oh, by the way. In California when airplanes are too low, headed in the wrong direction, apparently they turn 'em out like a light.

Mr. Lear: You artfully evaded answering my question.

Why in California does all airline traffic usually go north into San Fransisco, when in other parts of the country the landing pattern is determined by wind direction?

Also, another poster mentioned another airport much closer than San Fransisco is to the location you specified. If you need, I can quote it, but I am sure you read it. Why did you or your freinds think the plane was heading for or departing from San Francisco if there was another airport very close to where they were?

I am certainly glad Mr. Lear is back on this thread.

I am hoping he can please address my questions above.

Thanks.

Originally posted by jfj123
They don't use HOLOGRAMS to fool and jam enemy radar.

The system disrupts enemy command and control communications and limits adversary coordination essential for enemy force management. The Compass Call system employs the offensive counterinformation and electronic attack or EA capabilities in support of U.S. and Coalition tactical air, surface, and special operations forces. Programmed upgrades will expand its mission by procuring a secondary EA capability against early warning and acquisition radars.

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by jfj123
They don't use HOLOGRAMS to fool and jam enemy radar.

Yes, i know how aircraft jammers work.

If any aircraft have it, it would be them.

www.af.mil...

The system disrupts enemy command and control communications and limits adversary coordination essential for enemy force management. The Compass Call system employs the offensive counterinformation and electronic attack or EA capabilities in support of U.S. and Coalition tactical air, surface, and special operations forces. Programmed upgrades will expand its mission by procuring a secondary EA capability against early warning and acquisition radars.