The Truth about UFOs and What we can do about it.

Originally posted by guyfrom2007
My dear friend, my inference that other highly intelligent technologically advanced, Human Like Beings would not use metallic spacecraft is based on the following:

I snipped the blah blah blah of words following the colon.

None of what you typed is proof. You know nothing about alien technology or how it might (or does) operate. Everything you typed was pure specualation and guess work, which doesn't come close to satisfying a 'logical proof'.

It looks like I'll have to cancel my order for your book, seeing it's full of pulp fiction.

It looks like I'll have to cancel my order for your book, seeing it's full of pulp fiction.

Well you need not worry too much about that because I am not coming out with a book on this subject. Too busy with more earthly projects.

Yes, there is no harm in speculating so long as it does not seem overtly insane.

Thanks for your comments anyway.

Guru

Originally posted by guyfrom2007
What are my interests here? Apart from putting across my views. Why does it require such a big deal to constructively read some balanced views. I am not a Advertising Guru to create clinching online headliners.

When I spoke of interests, I was talking about havin an open discussion with people. At least that's what my impression was of your interests from your 2nd (complaining) post.

If you don't want to create "clinching online headliners" maybe you shouldn't call your thread "the truth about UFOs".

It is not me my friend,but everyone from Stanton Friendman to Nike Pope and ofcourse the Disclosure Project. Ofcourse not to mention Tom Cruise and his scientology sect.

Tom Cruise and scientology have nothing to do with this, and shouldn't be brought up to a serious UFO discussion, in my opinion.

I'm aware what Stanton Friedman and many others claim. I understand their views, agree with many of them. That's not my problem here. The problem is that you claimed to know the truth about UFOs and then simply enumerated some UFO hypotheses.

I'm well aware of them, as I hope everyone here in ATS is as well. However, I find it pretentious of you to call them the truth about UFOs, since that information hasn't been (publicly) verified.

Report after Report (Blue Book, Condon, Cometa, The French UFO files, British UFO disclosure, etc) have come to the same conlcusion as I have. So this is not something new that I am stating. I am just emphasising the points because there is so much disinfo and chaff on ATS, we need to focus on Reality and not engage in fiction, if we are to seriously study this subject.

In that case you should know that The Condon Report states exactly the opposite, and is stated as one of the primary reasons for the UFO subject not being taken more seriously by the scientific community.

The Condon Report:

This final report (Formally titled Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects but commonly called the Condon Report) was published in 1968. It officially concluded that no UFO reports were anomalous, all UFO reports had conventional explanations, and further study of the subject would not be worthwhile. The Report’s conclusions were endorsed by the National Academy of Sciences, were generally welcomed by the scientific community, and have been cited as a decisive factor in the generally low levels of interest regarding UFOs among academics in subsequent years. Peter Sturrock writes that the report is "the most influential public document concerning the scientific status of this (UFO) problem. Hence, all current scientific work on the UFO problem must make reference to the Condon Report."

ed: spelling.

[edit on 12-10-2007 by danx]

I think your focus is not on the subject but me personally which is very sad. In face I find this quite rampant across this forum.

When I clearly mentioned that what I am saying also falls in the realm of speculation NOT FACT, then when you keep hammering that I am making a de-facto statement is quite indicative of the fact that you wish not to discuss the subject matter but instead attack the OP so that this thread does not gather the interest it deserves.

I am surprised why you are taking this way to seriously and hitting on my comments as if they are GOD send.

What are the moderators up to? If this is the way one is treated for putting forth their PERSONAL views then this is not the forum for me to do that.

I would say adieu and leave you all in your ignorance.

Originally posted by guyfrom2007
When I clearly mentioned that what I am saying also falls in the realm of speculation NOT FACT

Check what you previously wrote. You made the claim that you can prove as fact that aliens do not use metallic spaceships. All you have offered to support this is your personal opinions. You contradict yourself, as to what you state and what you can actually show to be true.

then when you keep hammering that I am making a de-facto statement is quite indicative of the fact that you wish not to discuss the subject matter but instead attack the OP so that this thread does not gather the interest it deserves.

This thread deserves little interest, as it is full of your (far-fetched) opinions - NOT FACTS.

You're responsible for tying yourself up in the contradiciton. No one else put you there, other than yourself.

Leaving us on ignore is not the best way for you to participate in a debate. Remember, you claimed that you could debate this for hours, if necessary. Yet, here we are on page two and you're already calling for Moderator intervention. That seems like another contradiction to me.