It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Omega99
He had other options, like calmly explaining what is going to happen to her if she doesn't cooperate.
Originally posted by apc
She probably doesn't have a father at home, and her mother is incompetent and on welfare, so she gets to stay out all night with no consequences for her actions. She thinks she's a queen and entitled to whatever she desires. She'll probably have at least one kid by the time she's old enough to drink, and the cycle continues.
Originally posted by esdad71
First, the last person you want to deal with is a woman. They bite, pull hair, knee in the balls....a guy just swings.
^^^^i think that is the most lame thing i have ever heard....tons of generalizations floating around here....a guy 'just swings'
Also, the 'leverage' arguement on the take down...try it. It is alot harder to apply tactics such as those in a real world situation as opposed to training for it.
^^^^oh, i've tried it...been on both ends of it tons of times....is it hard to apply these tactics in real world situations? sometimes.....does that mean that whould not know these techniques? i think you are mistaken my friend....if you are trained in the proper techniques, a takedown/toss/throw is not as hard as you are making it out to be.
Originally posted by apc
I just see a common pattern of behavior. Interpret it however you wish.
You can whine all you want about how he should have been able to bust out some mad crazy leet ninja tactics on her, but this is reality we're dealing with.
When someone has their arm tightly clutched against their chest, it's not exactly easy to peel it away. Someone is going to get hurt. You can't expect that someone to be the cop.
This is on CNN? Oh brother. I give it three hours before Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are spewing their verbal diarrhea over this.
Originally posted by Fiverz
One thing I never understood about the law system is how black and white it is.
Breaking curfew against the law? Yup. DUI? Yup. Cold-blooded murder? Yup.
Does that mean in an instance where a teen was resisting arrest for breaking the law via curfew, he or she should be subject to the same treatment if he or she was resisting arrest as a known DUI or suspected murderer?
The problem comes when you say "well the law says anyone resisting arrest is to be treated with escalating levels of force." What about people that are REALLY doing no wrong and are being wrongfully arrested? Or those who are unaware of the law and have no idea what is going on? Should they be subject to the same levels of force as a suspected felon?
I understand to protect themselves the cops have to treat all "unknowns" as "hostile". But doesn't that mentality just morph into a police state over time?
I'll be honest with you ... if a cop came up to me threatening arrest my first instinct would not be to put my hands up - rather I would question it. If I truly believed when I was 16 that there was no curfew in my town (there was) I would have resisted arrest. I would not have bit an officer, but I'm not going to go down and roll over for something just because someone else says I should.
I guess my main problem isn't this video (proper force was probably used, personally I think I could have taken her down with a sharp knee to the proper place as Intrepid mentioned earlier) and whether or not the law she was arrested for was proper (it is .... curfews are in place for a reason) ... it's where questioning/resisting those in "authority" leaves us. I mean will YOU put your hands behind your back if they attempt to arrest you for watering your lawn on an even-numbered day? Just because a person somewhere in another county wrote it in a book? And be ok with a seperated shoulder when you resist arrest because you think the law is frivolous?
Originally posted by JacKatMtn
I find it hypocritical that some who claim this as brutality are advocating physical submission techniques.
Originally posted by Boondock78
the only reason i don't think he did everything he could is cause he may not have BASIC self defense understanding or as you like to call it, 'leet ninja skills'.
Originally posted by Boondock78
'oh, it's hard to learn the proper way to hold/toss/lock, so lets just not try and learn.
who cares if the cops are out of shape and have no self defense training...
this crap is getting old, fast
Originally posted by shots
reply to post by dntwastetime
Hogwash just how many times is an officer supposed to tell her what to do? He gave her more them ample warnings and she refused too follow his directions so she deserved what she got. I also think it was exagerated about almost breaking her arm
[edit on 10/6/2007 by shots]