posted on Oct, 3 2007 @ 06:32 PM
Ah, forgot to mention ... the part about the Dutch research in the SD article about false memories is a good explanation for the seeming differences
in induced and "naturally occurring" NDEs.
But I also think it is feasible that the difference is mental; i.e., the people having the "naturally occurring" NDEs had it sprung on them, with no
preparation, out of the blue, when they thought they were dying. This set up a paradigm in their head that they associate it with an actual afterlife
because of a lifetime's cultural conditioning.
The induced NDEs, therefore, are done on people who are expecting something to happen, and know they are not dying.
That alone -- the knowledge that someone is NOT dying -- could be enough of an explanation of the differences.