Why does it seem the evil elitist are all homosexuals ?

Oy veh.

The link provided by the OP references allegations made by a prostitute against the US President and the US American Ambassador to Poland. Add that to the Jeff Gannon White House sleepovers and you have, wait a minute, presto-chango "It's Monica Lewinsky!"

If this garbage gets any traction in the press, then "bomb Iran" it will be.

Originally posted by zysin5

Thanks for posting that Bigot quote, that you trust so much from the mouth of Nixon..

I was not agreeing with his bigotry, as in a judgement of people who are gay, that is part of his judgement. I was showing a person who said they exist at the elite location.

I understand your concern and replaced words that may be offencive.

Unfortunately he said two things in the quote, one that homosexuals are at the bohemian grove. (my point)

And that he considers them in bigotry terms(I do not agree)

What, Lord Bucket, happens in regard to masturbation?
More leaking, I assume??

Yes. Masturbation also leaks energy into the environment.

reply to post by Gemwolf


I shouldn't bother but I will.

No rumors are ever proved to be true?When doing research one must never think outside the box,much less even consider anything that is not already documented?

Also you just flat out say no without doing any research of your own.I saw another poster get a quote directly from Nixons mouth.But that doesn't matter right?Your still right huh.Nixons just lying about bohemian grove for fun.

The fact is you are being ignorant for refusing to look at both sides with a open mind.Yet so many of you on here have such a open mind when it comes to gay poeple that you say everything is slanderous to gays.

Get over it,we're not slandering anyone at all.Simply trying to discuss some facts and some rumors that are WIDELY known if you only did one ounce of research.

Also I never said gay and pedophilia are the same thing or go hand in hand lol,get over that.So I can cherry pick your sentence and say you think whatever is equal to whatever just because you used the two words in one sentence?thats foolish, good job denying ignorance.
[edit on 25-9-2007 by Project_Silo]

[edit on 25-9-2007 by Project_Silo]

Originally posted by St Udio

probably because the ineuendo of homosexuality & satanistic practices
is easy mud-slinging that sticks to the victim regardless if true or not.

But to my sensibilities, these supposed 'elites' (or is it the Idle Rich?)
being labled as Gay is a erroneous & twisted & simplistic stereotyping...

Unless you are in a public bathroom when a Senator taps against your foot

|^ | ^|
|||
_||./_|_____

Just a joke, I know one incident does not a theory prove. Foley anyone

And it is a joke about this discussion, not about how people live their lives. please take it in that context.

[edit on 25-9-2007 by Redge777]

reply to post by Project_Silo


Perhaps then if you are going to bother to respond you could respond to some of the issues and not focus on what you think I know or don't know, or what research you think I have done or not done?

BTW the word is people not poeple.

Originally posted by Redge777


I was not agreeing with his bigotry, as in a judgement of people who are gay, that is part of his judgement. I was showing a person who said they exist at the elite location.
And that he considers them in bigotry terms(I do not agree)

and the whole comment was bigotry.. either you do agree with the comment or you dont...
You did say this...

I personally will trust the words of our former President Richard M. Nixon

You personally trust in the words of our former president....

What does trust mean? well we know the answer to that..

Thus would you like to say you would like to go back on what you said?

So you say you dont trust and agree with that he said? Or you do?

Sorry I just tend to take posts at face value...
I am no mind reader.. tho I wish I could.. but Im not...

Its going to be said over and over agin.. This boils down to people saying its okay to murder, lie, and steal... But its not okay to be gay...

Once you are found to be gay, then its all over with...

Bush is guilty of murder, lies. and stealing.. Yet none of his party will do anything about it... But wait... He might be gay... OH lets burn him at the steak now!!!! total BULL#!!!

And it is a joke about this discussion, not about how people live their lives. please take it in that context.

Normally I would be like.. this is not place for jokes.. But honestly man.. Thaks for the laugh... Even tho I might not agree with what you say... this is some heavy stuff..I guess we need to laugh now and agin...
So I give you that one...


[edit on 25-9-2007 by zysin5]

reply to post by Gemwolf


Thank you very much for pointing out in two seperate posts that I spelled the word people wrong.That contributes tons to the conversation and shows your motives.

I have responded to every issue.Yet you feel it is important enough to pick out one word I spelled wrong .And you completely make up things.Such as i think pedophelia and gays go hand in hand because I said the two things in the same sentence.

You're the one who criticized my research from the get go,I mentioned you clearly have not done any research period after the fact.i say you have done zero research because these rumors and some facts are everywhere and you surely would have come accross them. I have addressed everything you have said.Hell you don't even take the time to read my posts so how would you know what I'm saying.

You're also wrong about the fact that I called them evil elitist.In fact I said many many times I don't know exactly what they are doing at bohemian grove so I wouldn't call it evil or anything else.

I'll stop now since I feel this conversation is going no where since you clearly are not interested on the topic at hand,but are interested in arguing.You haven't even taken the time to read my entire posts and are making false assumptions and accusations every other line.




[edit on 25-9-2007 by Project_Silo]

Let's recap. You challenged my post and were offended because I apparently "slandered" or "mocked" your post. When my post was actually directed at the OP's post. Responded to your challenge, yet I'm the one looking for an "argument"?

Originally posted by Project_Silo

Thank you very much for pointing out in two seperate posts that I spelled the word people wrong.That contributes tons to the conversation and shows your motives.

...
Yet you feel it is important enough to pick out one word I spelled wrong .

I just thought I'd point it out to you seeing that you keep on misspelling it. Thought I was being helpful. (You don't think it's ironic that you still misspelled it after I pointed it out the first time?)

Originally posted by Project_Silo
And you completely make up things.Such as i think pedophelia and gays go hand in hand because I said the two things in the same sentence.

As I said earlier: You gave the impression that you thought the two goes hand in hand. I just wanted to clear up and make sure we're on the same page.

Originally posted by Project_Silo
I have responded to every issue.

No you haven't. I'll put it in simple words - the issue you seem to be missing. What does sexuality have to do with anything? I.e. What is the point? Or perhaps I should ask what is your point? You seem to be supporting the theory that "All Evil Elitists are homosexual". No you didn't call then "evil elitists". I just raised the question what an "evil elitist" is. And you also missed the point that any such theory can be postulated by a "one-sided research". I'm sure I gave more than enough examples of this.

Originally posted by Project_Silo
You're the one who criticized my research from the get go,I mentioned you clearly have not done any research period after the fact.i say you have done zero research because these rumors and some facts are everywhere and you surely would have come accross them. I have addressed everything you have said.Hell you don't even take the time to read my posts so how would you know what I'm saying.

I have read every single word you wrote. There's no indication that I haven't. Stating that I have not "done research"... I never said that the rumours doesn't exist. I just said that all "evil elitists" aren't homosexual. Does that mean that I didn't do "reasearch"? Perhaps it just says that my "research" shows the opposite...?

Originally posted by Project_Silo
You're also wrong about the fact that I called them evil elitist.In fact I said many many times I don't know exactly what they are doing at bohemian grove so I wouldn't call it evil or anything else.

No one said you called anyone evil.

Originally posted by Project_Silo
I'll stop now since I feel this conversation is going no where since you clearly are not interested on the topic at hand,but are interested in arguing.You haven't even taken the time to read my entire posts and are making false assumptions and accusations every other line.
[edit on 25-9-2007 by Project_Silo]

Enough said.


[edit on 25-9-2007 by Gemwolf]

I don't hate some guy because he chooses to have sex with other men.

That being said I don't think it should be promoted in schools as equivalent to heterosexuals- I don't want my child being taught about it by some paid state employee.

Also, it is fair to say that being homosexual isnt normal, because the definition of normal is

"conforming to the standard or the common type"

as homosexuals would be less than 10% of the population (less than 5% Id say) then this does not conform to the common type

There are a lot of things you have to believe in BEFORE even believing the title of your thread. Before we even discuss that...

who says that elitists and people with money and power are automatically evil? (I know, I know, thats the premise of conspiracy THEORY).

who says elitists are satantists?

who says they are mostly homosexual?

I have to wonder about how some people build speculation upon speculation upon speculation until they are lost in fantasia.

Originally posted by zysin5

Originally posted by Redge777
I was not agreeing with his bigotry, as in a judgement of people who are gay, that is part of his judgement. I was showing a person who said they exist at the elite location.
And that he considers them in bigotry terms(I do not agree)

and the whole comment was bigotry.. either you do agree with the comment or you dont...

You personally trust in the words of our former president....
What does trust mean? well we know the answer to that..

first I should have said I trust that what was said was his true feelings, I would not trust anything Nixon said to me in person.

I will repeat what I said above, he said two things in his comment, people at the bohemian grove show actions that he interpreted as homosexual.

And by using tone, and slur, he said he did not approve of this.

I was making my point, and answering a question posed, with the first part of his statement. I do not believe it is right to judge another group.

Thus would you like to say you would like to go back on what you said?
So you say you dont trust and agree with that he said? Or you do?

He said two things at once, I agree with one of them and did not think the other would offend, why because that is what he thought, I was quoting him and if anything exposing him as a bigot.

Its going to be said over and over agin.. This boils down to people saying its okay to murder, lie, and steal... But its not okay to be gay...

Read my post I said that sin is sin and we all do it we no sin is worse or any better then any other. I will add it is not for me to decide what is sin for others, I do have thoughts, but I am not the judge. I am responsible to try and not do what I consider sin, oh, and I fail often at that.

Bush is guilty of murder, lies. and stealing.. Yet none of his party will do anything about it... But wait... He might be gay... OH lets burn him at the steak now!!!! total BS!

You have a valid point, we can't impeach him or even beat him in election(rigged) in 2004 but if he was found to be gay, he might actually be impeached. Just like Clinton was for social moral issues.

Normally I would be like.. this is not place for jokes.. But honestly man.. Thaks for the laugh... Even tho I might not agree with what you say... this is some heavy stuff..I guess we need to laugh now and agin...
So I give you that one...

Hey thanks I thought that emot turned out rather well

I see it as a very important issue to you, but because it does not to me I am probably not sensitive enough about others who are concerns over the issue. If it helps I have friends that our gay, even a relative, she waited years to tell me because I am Christian, I was surprised, I thought she already knew that I knew. She brought her GF for Christmas dinner 2 years before, it was no secret to anyone I know in the family.

You see it never mattered. I have been hit on, I don't get angry, I just say nope not like that, it don't matter Jesus still loves them, and all of us should to, for we should treat all people with love and respect.

I apologize if my comments caused any bad feelings for you.

Originally posted by blueorder
I don't hate some guy because he chooses to have sex with other men.

That being said I don't think it should be promoted in schools as equivalent to heterosexuals- I don't want my child being taught about it by some paid state employee.

I agree with you. I also understand why others do not. For this reason I think it should be left to the parents to teach on this issue. After all it is a moral issue. People should be taught not to judge, but not what is right and wrong. Sort of this type of teaching, you can chose for yourself if you think it is right or wrong, but we will treat all people with respect.

On a side note, teaching and promoting homosexuality in the media is one of NWO population reduction methods. I figured I would add that to the mix. 90% reduction is their stated goal, world wide fertility rates have been cut in half over the last 50 years.

after reading I need to clarify, I know many people think it is a genetic issue(actually for them they know it is a genetic issue) and is not a moral issue, but the people who disagree with genetic, do consider it a moral issue. So for them it is a moral issue


[edit on 25-9-2007 by Redge777]

What gets me isn't the fact that many of them are gay, but the fact that they are "self-hating". If you look at the way they vote and listen to their speeches, it sounds like they hate gay people. I don't know if hey are playing to their base, or if they really hate the urges they get, and therefore hate themselves. It's an intresting look into the mind of meglomaniacs.

Maybe the reason why some of the world's most powerful gays are 100% evil is due to the fact they cannot have children naturally and are aware of their own genetic malfunction. This is then vented via satanic abuse, war and crap music.

I have also heard that gays appear on enemy radar and attract sharks.






Seriously though I have known a few gays (some camper than a row of tents and some less obviously gay) and none of them really seen hell bent on global domination, more at staring Peter Andre's plump buttocks*

*Who is obviously gay and is just in denial.

Evil elitists being homosexuals?! What?!

What are you talking about? In my experience, they are the persecuted ones. Heck, they are everywhere. In the middle east and other places in the world.

Really, what are you smoking?

Originally posted by LordBucketOnly female energy is properly able to receive male energy. With homosexual sex, there is no feminine to receive the masculine, but rather two deliverers of masculine energy, which, lacking a recipient, leaks into the environment. Extra-dimensional entities may then feed off of this energy. Homosexual sex is an efficient means of delivering energy to extra-dimensional "demonic" creatures, so it's in their best interest to manipulate humans into engaging in homosexual sex. Humans who willingly cooperate with these creatures would be easiest for them to manipulate, and thus, tend to engage in homosexual sex.

There is also the issue of proper functioning of humanity as a species. Just like an unhealthy host is more easily conquered by disease, so too is an unhealthy species conquered by another. By corrupting proper masculine/feminine relations of humanity, we become collectively weaker, and easier to conquer.
[edit on 25-9-2007 by LordBucket]

...

Wow, you've jumped the shark. That is the most demented thing I ever read all day.

Where did you get that from? I'm sure thats not anywhere in the Bible. Yeah, I'm positive. You just pulled that out of thin air.

When you control a person in power, the more (perceived) deviant behavior that person has hidden in the closet, the more controllable it makes them and almost assures that they'll do anything for their masters out of fear of being found out.

It's probable that the same (perceived) deviant behavior was being urged on and fed by the master on his or her way up the ladder.

(Perceived) deviant behavior can be multitude of things such as drug use, homosexual sex, pedophilia, bestiality to mention a few.

Peace

Originally posted by Copernicus
Well yes, the satanic connection is well documented. Skull & Bones and all that. I think 11 of Bush's closest employees are former members of the Yale skull & bones society (but dont quote me on that, its something I read somewhere that may not be true).

How the hell is the Skull & Bones a Satanic cult or society? It is a COLLEGE SECRET SOCIETY. Go to most prominent and some state universities and you will find them.

Wasn't Copernicus supposed to think logically?

Well if you, the OP, are assuming that Bush and the hypothetical skull and bones society he belongs to are homosexual satanists, then why the heck is he a Christian neo-con who is against homosexual rights?

Let me guess; it's a cover?