It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Griff
Could it be that you started a thread suppossedly "debunking" his website? I really don't feel it is his responsibility to verify your document. Especially after the way you've been treating him here. For one, calling him a liar.
He's already stated that they are stonewalling his investigation. How would he get veryfication then? Since you are for the official story and AA is for the official story, I'd imagine they would talk to you over Rob.
And all the polititions and their cronies who are lying their nads off and making a killing are A-OK with you? Guilliani for one. Care to look into how much he gets paid for just speaking about 9/11?
Originally posted by johndoex
AMTMAN, why do you contradict John Hotard who states he contacted Tulsa and Tulsa told him that the Engineering Change Order for deactivation was issued prior to 9/11.
This was not a "decision made in the Ivory Tower" as you contend. Hotard clearly states the deactivation Engineering Change Order was issued prior to 9/11.
Why did you show up 2 days after our article was published with your claims, yet refused to have an interview with me to post on our front page disputing the documents posted?
Originally posted by johndoex
Why did Chris Christensen of AA Legal Dept not want to go on record nor able to provide the same document as you prior to publishing our article? AA Legal and American Airlines googled my name and clammed up after. It was fun to watch. AMTMAN shows up two days after with a document stating the deactivation not even referenced in the 757 AMM page as the deactivation order.
Originally posted by johndoex
AMTMAN, why will you not give James or Pat your name? Our source has given us his...
Why are you, an anonymous internet poster able to produce this document which contradicts Hotard, but AA Legal dept was not able to do the same in the months prior to publishing our article? Remember, AA Legal said they were willing to help.. its all recorded.
Wanna dance AMTMAN?
Originally posted by johndoex
Wow.. no reply AMTMAN? You follow me around the net constantly, reply within a few mins .. and no reply to the bottom of page 6?
[edit on 21-9-2007 by johndoex]
Originally posted by johndoex
Even if your paperwork shows up in the AA dBase... it is clear you are a shill.. might not be intentional.. but look in the mirror. Im sure you never heard of the statement "Pencil-Whippping"? C'mon.. tell us... shill.
[edit on 21-9-2007 by johndoex]
Originally posted by johndoex
shill.
I dont blame you for not wanting to be interviewed... as you have refused since 2 days after we published our article..
[edit on 21-9-2007 by johndoex]
Originally posted by johndoex
Let me know if you change your mind.. but i dont think you will... you're too much of a coward to put your name on your claims.
[edit on 21-9-2007 by johndoex]
Originally posted by Griff
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
Could I get the document verified? I will have to know who could do this. Thats why since Rob claims to have connections I asked him to verify it for me. He refuses to!
Could it be that you started a thread suppossedly "debunking" his website? I really don't feel it is his responsibility to verify your document. Especially after the way you've been treating him here. For one, calling him a liar.
Rob can do this with a couple clicks of his mouse and refuses!
He's already stated that they are stonewalling his investigation. How would he get veryfication then? Since you are for the official story and AA is for the official story, I'd imagine they would talk to you over Rob.
Question. Have you even tried to verify your document?
but he is dishonest and makes money off the tragedy on 9/11.
And all the polititions and their cronies who are lying their nads off and making a killing are A-OK with you? Guilliani for one. Care to look into how much he gets paid for just speaking about 9/11?
Originally posted by AMTMAN
Why don't you ask Rob for an explanation for the TR that pertains to 23-19-00 along with some documentation to refute the accomplishment dates for F0871? Since Rob has a source at AA he should be able to do this rather easily.
Originally posted by Griff
Originally posted by AMTMAN
Why don't you ask Rob for an explanation for the TR that pertains to 23-19-00 along with some documentation to refute the accomplishment dates for F0871? Since Rob has a source at AA he should be able to do this rather easily.
Why don't you? You seem to have plenty of contacts and info. yourself. Why don't you shut him up? So far, all I've seen is you and CO calling him a liar without backing up your claims. At least Rob is backing his claims up. At least it appears to me for I have no clue on what FO871 and the like is.
Originally posted by AMTMAN
Thank you for proving me right first of all. You really could care less about the truth.
The fact that you won't ask Rob any hard questions proves me right.
TR for 23-19-00 dated April 2007 proves that Rob is lying. Just as the accomplishment dates for ECO F0871.
So much for backing up his claims.
Originally posted by Griff
Originally posted by AMTMAN
Thank you for proving me right first of all. You really could care less about the truth.
You know me that well huh?
The fact that you won't ask Rob any hard questions proves me right.
What hard questions? You are the one trying to debunk him. The onus is on you my friend. Not me.
TR for 23-19-00 dated April 2007 proves that Rob is lying. Just as the accomplishment dates for ECO F0871.
All I have seen from you in this thread is numbers and call signs and nothing to back them up. Why? If you have these documents, let's see them. If not, you are calling someone a liar without any real proof yourself.
So much for backing up his claims.
I could say the same for you.