It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Current rules of both the FCC and the Federal Aviation Administration ban in-flight cellular calling. The primary FCC concern has been possible disruption of cell phone communication on the ground. The FAA's worry is how cell phones might interfere with a plane's navigation and electrical systems.
At Wednesday's meeting, FCC officials proposed allowing passengers to use "off the shelf" wireless handsets and other devices so long as they operate at their lowest power setting and do not broadcast unwanted radio frequency emissions that could interfere with cellular networks on the ground. The FCC will now seek public comment on these issues. It will also work with the FAA to ensure that FCC rules and policies complement the FAA's efforts.
Engineers at NASA noted at least three years ago that cell phones were being built so well that they emitted remarkably fewer interference-causing spurious radio signals. A NASA engineer said in a 2000 interview that the airplane cell phone ban would be lifted once earlier generations of cell phones wore down and were tossed out or recycled.
Originally posted by johndoex
CaptObvious,
Further, anytime you want to address the fact that John Hotard, PR Rep from American Airlines says the deactivation order was issued prior to 9/11/2001 (and puts his name on that statement), which contradicts your paperwork above obtained from an anonymous source through the internet... let us know. However, i think you already have made up your mind and will find anything to back up your preconceived notions, even if from an anonymous internet source which contradicts John Hotard himself. You will go further to mislead your readers that we have not commented on the blog entry at SLC when in fact anyone who reads the comment section will clearly see we have commented more than once.
You bias is extreme. Your deception is clear.
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
reply to post by johndoex
Rob ~
You are not making sence. Throw all these names around from SLC and JREF... I don't care. Post your replys to "Pat" and the others over there. Just answer me one question.....
HAVE YOU SENT A COPY OF THE WORK ORDER TO YOUR CONTACT AT THE AIRLINES?
Answer the question. If not... why?
If this comes up as a fraud, I will be the first to apologize to you and the others at your fantasy website.
Oh.. one more thing...do you agree with Dr. Griffin that the phones cals that were made were due to "voice morphing?" I doubt I will get a response to the question either.
Thanks,
CO
Originally posted by JimmyBlonde
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
As you see, these undoctored documents (besides personal information) show that the airphones were not deactivated until March of 2002.
[edit on 15-9-2007 by CaptainObvious]
Hi, Captain obvious.
I have no real interest in the documents or what they imply but I would like to point out that what you have posted is a scan of a document and not a real document. Scanning a document and posting it on the internets does not constitute proof or even a convincing argument.
Thanks.
Originally posted by shug7272
reply to post by johndoex
Seems to me you are wasting your time on CaptainO. If you can back up your claims with names of people in the industry and he cant why continue to argue with a wall? He believes the official story and thats fine. If the average person looks at the two forms of info, one signed and verified and the other "anonymous", it doesnt take a genius to figure out which is more credible. Not to mention you and your partners have real knowledge and experience in the field and your arguing with "some internet guy". I wouldnt validate him with a response. You can look at the star ratings of you and CaptainOs posts on the first page and understand that nobody is buying his garbage. Wouldnt even buy it if it were on sale.
[edit on 19-9-2007 by shug7272]
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
I will bet my house that he made the clone name of mine just to try to make me look bad.
Originally posted by johndoex
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
I will bet my house that he made the clone name of mine just to try to make me look bad.
I'll take that bet.
Mods, please look up IP's and inform CaptOvious to start packing his bags.
CO, send your deed to this address...along with a contract stating you will be paying the remainder of the mortgage...
click
Also, your frivilous claims at attempts to discredit in order to derail your own thread because you are relying on an anonymous source on the net are very unbecoming, text book disinfo and predictable...
I have been through numerous FAA background checks, criminal background checks, PRIA checks, and random drugs tests required by the FAA. They arent worried about some spat on the net and they wont be in the future. Give it a rest and stop your whining.
Im also not surprised you would attack our support structure. We are up against multi-billion dollar propaganda machines such as Fox News. But i suppose you feel Fox is truth and you dont mind if they raise funding to inform the public. Do you attack this forum as well for raising funds in order to operate?
shug, no worries my friend. CO is not really worth much of my time. He will take any information as gospel obtained from any source, no matter the accuracy, as long as it supports the govt story. A critical thinker he is not (i see he hasnt found our update as well, not surprised). However, i couldnt pass him up on his bet. Observe the backpeddling and excuses that will now pour from CaptObvious. He'll probably even try to spout some Conspiracy Theory that i had a friend do it..lol
Cap, you arent that important. You cannot debate facts. You derail your own thread and you have been proven to eat your foot many times in the past.
I'll be looking forward to your deed and contract in the mail Cap.
fixed link
[edit on 20-9-2007 by johndoex]