It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
I am not entirely sure just who started the "black smoke means an oxygen starved fire" baloney, but it is just that, baloney. Ask ANY member of the US Armed Forces, especially those in aviation, just what color smoke comes from a jet fuel caused fire...heres a hint DARK BLACK. Hell ask any resident of Mayport, Florida or San Diego what color smoke came from the firefighting schools, back when we still actually used jet fuel, diesel and mogas to start the fires...they will tell you the same thing. Big, raging fires producing billowing black smoke. Good grief, does anyone actually look for information OTHER than what they read on conspiracy sites?
Originally posted by Boone 870
HothSnake1, why are steel buildings required to have fireproofing if "construction grade" steel doesn't lose strength when exposed to fire?
Originally posted by teebigins
Well if the decking sagged downwards wouldn't it pull the attached columns inward. Hence the horizontal force. I don't know if this happened exactly but it is very likely, and doesn't defy all laws of physics like some claim.
How do you know the columns just collapsed? the inside columns were inside so its hard to say what actually happened. What should the columns on the outside have done? just stand there while several tons of concrete and steel are falling on them. How does this defy logic?
There are just sooooo many holes in the controlled demo logic.
Originally posted by teebigins
This is a very dynamic problem and of course columns don't just fall straight onto other ones things are tumbling and moving and further weakening the structure.
The levels weren't found in neat piles because they had just fallen from such a large height, and the potential energy was so massive it pulverized everything in its path.
Electromagnetic resistance force? come on man your just trying to fool people with big words now.
Also I obviously don't mean that only level 82 falls into 81 I mean 82 and everything above it.
Also again gravity can act to pull a body in no other direction then straight down. How do you figure that gravity pulls this massive object to a side?
ive never fallen to the right I only fall down.
A tree is top heavy and connected at a point on the bottom so it topples to a side
call it what you will but its just a name to try and explain it to laymen.
But as the building is falling velocity is increasing,
Thanks for the physics lesson.(once again CTers teaching others the truth) If i need to prove that the velocity of an object increases in free fall
I don't need to prove that the 13 floors had enough energy to continue the collapse, I saw it.
Not to mention the 200+ engineers that were on the ground doing tests to prove it.
yet you know for certain that it was a controlled demo just from looking at a youtube video and reading some conspiracy theory websites.
Please don't bother telling me that all these engineers, who have a much better grasp on the necessary physics then you or me, were in on the plot too.
Exactamundo! Ay there's the rub, isn't it? All you have to do is use the two eyes that God gave you and your brain.. A so-called "pancake" collapse isn't going to look anything remotely like this. And please explain to the gallery how such catastophic failure could have occurred at nearly the exact same time, through the entire structure of a 110 story concrete reenforced steel skyscraper, built to withstand fires, hurricane force winds, and plane impacts, and has a huge steel core in the center of it, all made of construction-grade steel? Not just once, but three times on the same day in the same place for the first time in the history of skyscrapers? Can anyone answer this riddle for me? I mean, I could buy a partial collapse of maybe one of the Towers, but not three buildings on the same day. I'd love for the resident mathmetician and conspiracy dubunker to calculate the odds on that.
Originally posted by teebigins
The two hottest horizontal trusses failed first at the top and bottom pulling in the columns.
How could a plane flying into a building only heat 1 level when all the levels are connected and steel is a great conductor of heat.
Not to mention it is the opinion of engineers and scientists that actually got their hands on the tangible evidence.
How could a plane flying into a building only heat 1 level when all the levels are connected and steel is a great conductor of heat.
Rofl, then how would you be able to tell the difference? Why bother if it all just comes down to you blindly trusting some undefined group engineers anyway? If you don't know what you're talking about, that's your fault, not mine.
I still have time and precedent on my side. Your so quick to write everyone off as sheep while at the same time you ramble on about how evil the world is and how everyone is out to get you. ( ohh that's a new line) The world is not that simple, it's not good vs evil/black and white. Its shades of gray. It's compromise. Also, you quote FDR, yet condemn all politicians as evil. You pick and choose the evidence that supports your side and ignore all other evidence.
I love the jump you make from wal-mart having more money/influence then me so that means one day I will be in a concentration camp. Also there are many economists that see walmart as a positive thing for the public/economy. What about civil liberites/environmental lobbying which have made amazing and positive change over the years? You ignore all things positive and concentrate only on the negative. YOU SEE only what you want.
there are many economists that see walmart as a positive thing for the public/economy.
www.newamericancentury.org...
June 3, 1997
American foreign and defense policy is adrift. Conservatives have criticized the incoherent policies of the Clinton Administration. They have also resisted isolationist impulses from within their own ranks. But conservatives have not confidently advanced a strategic vision of America's role in the world. They have not set forth guiding principles for American foreign policy. They have allowed differences over tactics to obscure potential agreement on strategic objectives. And they have not fought for a defense budget that would maintain American security and advance American interests in the new century.
We aim to change this. We aim to make the case and rally support for American global leadership.
As the 20th century draws to a close, the United States stands as the world's preeminent power. Having led the West to victory in the Cold War, America faces an opportunity and a challenge: Does the United States have the vision to build upon the achievements of past decades? Does the United States have the resolve to shape a new century favorable to American principles and interests?
Iraq, September 20,2001
We agree with Secretary of State Powell’s recent statement that Saddam Hussein “is one of the leading terrorists on the face of the Earth….” It may be that the Iraqi government provided assistance in some form to the recent attack on the United States. But even if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack, any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq. Failure to undertake such an effort will constitute an early and perhaps decisive surrender in the war on international terrorism. The United States must therefore provide full military and financial support to the Iraqi opposition. American military force should be used to provide a “safe zone” in Iraq from which the opposition can operate. And American forces must be prepared to back up our commitment to the Iraqi opposition by all necessary means
www.newamericancentury.org...
January 26, 1998
We are writing you because we are convinced that current American policy toward Iraq is not succeeding, and that we may soon face a threat in the Middle East more serious than any we have known since the end of the Cold War. In your upcoming State of the Union Address, you have an opportunity to chart a clear and determined course for meeting this threat. We urge you to seize that opportunity, and to enunciate a new strategy that would secure the interests of the U.S. and our friends and allies around the world. That strategy should aim, above all, at the removal of Saddam Hussein’s regime from power. We stand ready to offer our full support in this difficult but necessary endeavor. www.newamericancentury.org...
May 29, 1998
originally posted by HothSnake1
Also, explain to me how Jet airliners could produce this:
external image
and this:
external image
05/11/03: (Information Clearing House) Unless you were around and following events in the 1980s, especially Central American affairs and later, the Iran-contra scandal, you probably won’t know who Elliot Abrams is. More’s the pity too. As Reagan's Assistant Secretary of State for Human Rights and Humanitarian Affairs he used to oversee US foreign policy in Latin America, and was active in covering up some of the worst atrocities committed by the US-sponsored Contras. According to congressional records, under Abram's watch, the Contras "raped, tortured, and killed unarmed civilians, including children," and that "groups of civilians, including women and children, were burned, dismembered, blinded and beheaded." www.informationclearinghouse.info...
Originally posted by SOONER
I am going to write a brief description of the founders of a Project for a New American Centuary and the correlations between them and the Bush Administration...
[edit on 4-9-2007 by SOONER]
Do you have specific kinds of failures in mind? Either way, your assumption that an entire floor's worth of mass is going to come loose and fall straight down all at once is absurd.
rofl man, it's physics. There's no such thing as a "normal force" in reality. What do you think the normal force really is coming from?
No -- HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE? If the floors are pancaking, how does EVERYTHING above a certain floor fall straight down onto the floors below? Think! The floors falling would be a shear motion against the perimeter and core columns. Those columns wouldn't fall straight down into themselves too! They were solidly welded together, solid lengths of columns sticking up in the air with lateral bracing every floor.
This is a huge simplification of vectors in 3 or even 2 dimensions. Have you ever had vector math? It would really simplify this stuff if you have. Forces add as vectors. Gravity can be applied at -90 degrees...
No, it topples to a side because gravity isn't strong enough to rip it apart from the inside out. Only topple it. To do anything else would require extra energy.
Prove it. This is a dynamics problem, and the energy being spent on all the destruction must be less than the energy being added by each floor, for the collapse wave to accelerate.
Where are they? Where's their report?
I'm sorry to say that this isn't going to get me down coming from someone who can't understand how gravity can cause something to fall asymmetrically.